The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 78 No. 2 August 1997, pp. 1108-1119
Copyright ©1997 The American Physiological Society

Effect of Remote Distractors on Saccade Programming: Evidence for an Extended Fixation Zone

Robin Walker¹, Heiner Deubel², Werner X. Schneider², and John M. Findlay¹

¹ Department of Psychology, University of Durham, Durham, DH1 3LE United Kingdom; and ² Institut für Psychologie, Allgemeine und Experimentelle Psychologie, D-80802 Munich, Germany

Walker, Robin, Heiner Deubel, Werner X. Schneider, and John M. Findlay. Effect of remote distractors on saccade programming: evidence for an extended fixation zone. J. Neurophysiol. 78: 1108-1119, 1997. In a series of experiments, we examined the increase in saccade latency that is observed consistently when distractor stimuli are presented simultaneously with the saccade target at various nontarget locations. In the first experiment, targets and distractors were presented on the horizontal axis. We found that saccade latency was increased when distractors appeared at fixation and in the contralateral nontarget hemifield (at eccentricities 10°). In contrast, latency was unaffected by distractors presented along the ipsilateral target axis, but amplitude was increased as saccades tended to land at intermediate locations between the two stimuli (global effect). The effect of presenting distractors at various two-dimensional locations in both the target and nontarget hemifields then was examined, and the maximum latency increase again was observed when distractors appeared at fixation. Distractors presented on any of the eight principal axes in either hemifield, other than on the horizontal target axis, also increased latency. The relationship between the effects of distractors on latency and amplitude was reciprocal. Within ~20° of the target axis itself, distractors affected saccade amplitude but not latency. In contrast, distractors presented outside this "window" increased saccade latency without affecting amplitude. A systematic quantitative relationship was revealed between the increase in latency and the ratio between target and distractor eccentricities. The latency increase was largest with small values of the ratio and reached a peak with distractors at the fixation location. The finding that the increase observed for more eccentric distractor locations fitted the same function as that at fixation shows that inhibitory effects operate over large areas of the visual field. The increase in latency under distractor conditions is interpreted in light of recent neurophysiological findings of inhibitory processes operating in the rostral region of the superior colliculus. Our results suggest that these inhibitory processes are not restricted to the central foveal region alone but operate over wider regions of the visual field.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S.-n. Yang, S. J. Heinen, and M. Missal The Effects of Microstimulation of the Dorsomedial Frontal Cortex on Saccade Latency J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2008; 99(4): 1857 - 1870. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Ptak, A. Schnider, L. Golay, and R. Muri A non-spatial bias favouring fixated stimuli revealed in patients with spatial neglect Brain, December 1, 2007; 130(12): 3211 - 3222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. C. Dorris, E. Olivier, and D. P. Munoz Competitive Integration of Visual and Preparatory Signals in the Superior Colliculus during Saccadic Programming J. Neurosci., May 9, 2007; 27(19): 5053 - 5062. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. M. Milstein and M. C. Dorris The Influence of Expected Value on Saccadic Preparation J. Neurosci., May 2, 2007; 27(18): 4810 - 4818. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. R. Gottlob, M. T. Fillmore, and B. D. Abroms Age-Group Differences in Saccadic Interference J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., March 1, 2007; 62(2): P85 - P89. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. McSorley, P. Haggard, and R. Walker Time Course of Oculomotor Inhibition Revealed by Saccade Trajectory Modulation J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2006; 96(3): 1420 - 1424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X. Li and M. A. Basso Competitive Stimulus Interactions within Single Response Fields of Superior Colliculus Neurons J. Neurosci., December 7, 2005; 25(49): 11357 - 11373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. J. White, K. R. Gegenfurtner, and D. Kerzel Effects of Structured Nontarget Stimuli on Saccadic Latency J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2005; 93(6): 3214 - 3223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Watanabe, Y. Kobayashi, Y. Inoue, and T. Isa Effects of Local Nicotinic Activation of the Superior Colliculus on Saccades in Monkeys J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2005; 93(1): 519 - 534. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Colonius and A. Diederich Multisensory Interaction in Saccadic Reaction Time: A Time-Window-of-Integration Model J. Cogn. Neurosci., July 1, 2004; 16(6): 1000 - 1009. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Tanimoto, M. Takagi, T. Bando, H. Abe, S. Hasegawa, T. Usui, A. Miki, and D. S. Zee Central and Peripheral Visual Interactions in Disparity-Induced Vergence Eye Movements: I. Spatial Interaction Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2004; 45(4): 1132 - 1138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. J. Krauzlis Recasting the Smooth Pursuit Eye Movement System J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2004; 91(2): 591 - 603. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Arai, R. M. McPeek, and E. L. Keller Properties of Saccadic Responses in Monkey When Multiple Competing Visual Stimuli Are Present J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2004; 91(2): 890 - 900. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Liston and R. J. Krauzlis Shared Response Preparation for Pursuit and Saccadic Eye Movements J. Neurosci., December 10, 2003; 23(36): 11305 - 11314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. M. Reingold and D. M. Stampe Saccadic Inhibition in Voluntary and Reflexive Saccades J. Cogn. Neurosci., April 1, 2002; 14(3): 371 - 388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.F.W. Neggers and H. Bekkering Gaze Anchoring to a Pointing Target Is Present During the Entire Pointing Movement and Is Driven by a Non-Visual Signal J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2001; 86(2): 961 - 970. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. P. Trappenberg, M. C. Dorris, D. P. Munoz, and R. M. Klein A Model of Saccade Initiation Based on the Competitive Integration of Exogenous and Endogenous Signals in the Superior Colliculus J. Cogn. Neurosci., March 1, 2001; 13(2): 256 - 271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.F.W. Neggers and H. Bekkering Ocular Gaze is Anchored to the Target of an Ongoing Pointing Movement J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2000; 83(2): 639 - 651. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. J. Gandhi and E. L. Keller Comparison of Saccades Perturbed by Stimulation of the Rostral Superior Colliculus, the Caudal Superior Colliculus, and the Omnipause Neuron Region J Neurophysiol, December 1, 1999; 82(6): 3236 - 3253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. D. Corneil, C. A. Hing, D. V. Bautista, and D. P. Munoz Human Eye-Head Gaze Shifts in a Distractor Task. I. Truncated Gaze Shifts J Neurophysiol, September 1, 1999; 82(3): 1390 - 1405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. D. Corneil and D. P. Munoz Human Eye-Head Gaze Shifts in a Distractor Task. II. Reduced Threshold for Initiation of Early Head Movements J Neurophysiol, September 1, 1999; 82(3): 1406 - 1421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]