The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 78 No. 2 August 1997, pp. 939-959
Copyright ©1997 The American Physiological Society

Effects of Inactivating Individual Cerebellar Nuclei on the Performance and Retention of an Operantly Conditioned Forelimb Movement

M. S. Milak, Y. Shimansky, V. Bracha, and J. R. Bloedel

Division of Neurobiology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona 85013

Milak, M. S., Y. Shimansky, V. Bracha, and J. R. Bloedel. Effects of inactivating individual cerebellar nuclei on the performance and retention of an operantly conditioned forelimb movement. J. Neurophysiol. 78: 939-959, 1997. These experiments were designed to examine the effects of inactivating separately each of the major cerebellar nuclear regions in cats on the execution and retention of a previously learned, operantly conditioned volitional forelimb movement. The experiments test the postulates that the cerebellar nuclei, and particularly the interposed nuclei, contribute substantially to the spatial and temporal features of the interjoint coordination required to execute the task and that the engram necessary for the retention of this task is not located in any one of the cerebellar nuclei. All cats were trained to perform a task in which they were required to reach for and grasp a vertical bar at the sound of a tone and move the bar to a reward zone through a template consisting of two straight grooves in the shape of an inverted "L." After the task was learned, the effects of inactivating separately each nuclear region (the fastigial, interposed, and dentate nuclei) using muscimol microinjections were determined. Data were analyzed by quantifying several features of the movement's kinematics and by determining changes in the organization of the reaching component of the movement using an application of dimensionality analysis, an analysis that examines the correlation among the changes in joint angles and limb segment positions during the task. The retention of the previously learned task also was assessed after each injection. Injections of each nuclear region affected temporal and spatial features of the learned movement. However, the largest effects resulted from inactivating the interposed nuclei. These effects included an increased length of the reach trajectory, an accentuated deviation of the wrist trajectory from a straight line, cyclic movement of the distal extremity as the target was approached, a difficulty in grasping the bar, altered temporal features of the movement, and a highly characteristic change in the dimensionality measurements. The changes in dimensionality reflected a decreased correlation (linear interdependence) of the joint angular velocities coupled with an increased correlation among the linear velocities of markers located on the joints themselves. Related but less consistent changes in dimensionality resulted from fastigial injections. The motor sequence required to negotiate the template could be executed after the nuclear microinjections, indicating that retention of the motor sequence was not affected by the inactivation of any of the cerebellar nuclei. However, in two of the five animals, some decreases in performance were observed after dentate injection that were not characteristic of changes related to an effect on retention. These data suggest that the cerebellum plays an important role in regulating the consistent, stereotypic organization of complex goal-directed movements, including the temporal correlation among joint angle velocities. The data also indicate that the retention of the task is not dependent on any of the individual cerebellar nuclear regions. Consequently, these structures are unlikely to be critical storage sites for the engram established during the learning of this task.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. Ilg, M. A. Giese, E. R. Gizewski, B. Schoch, and D. Timmann The influence of focal cerebellar lesions on the control and adaptation of gait Brain, October 3, 2008; (2008) awn246v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. F. Del Olmo, B. Cheeran, G. Koch, and J. C. Rothwell Role of the Cerebellum in Externally Paced Rhythmic Finger Movements J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2007; 98(1): 145 - 152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Ilg, H. Golla, P. Thier, and M. A. Giese Specific influences of cerebellar dysfunctions on gait Brain, March 1, 2007; 130(3): 786 - 798. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. M. Horn, M. Pong, S. R. Batni, S. M. Levy, and A. R. Gibson Functional Specialization Within the Cat Red Nucleus J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2002; 87(1): 469 - 477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. M. Earhart and A. J. Bastian Selection and Coordination of Human Locomotor Forms Following Cerebellar Damage J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2001; 85(2): 759 - 769. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. E. Cooper, J. H. Martin, and C. Ghez Effects of Inactivation of the Anterior Interpositus Nucleus on the Kinematic and Dynamic Control of Multijoint Movement J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2000; 84(4): 1988 - 2000. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. H. Martin, S. E. Cooper, A. Hacking, and C. Ghez Differential Effects of Deep Cerebellar Nuclei Inactivation on Reaching and Adaptive Control J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2000; 83(4): 1886 - 1899. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-J. Wang, Y. Shimansky, V. Bracha, and J. R. Bloedel Effects of Cerebellar Nuclear Inactivation on the Learning of a Complex Forelimb Movement in Cats J Neurophysiol, May 1, 1998; 79(5): 2447 - 2459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]