The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 78 No. 5 November 1997, pp. 2503-2517
Copyright ©1997 The American Physiological Society

Monkey Cutaneous SAI and RA Responses to Raised and Depressed Scanned Patterns: Effects of Width, Height, Orientation, and a Raised Surround

David T. Blake, Kenneth O. Johnson, and Steven S. Hsiao

Krieger Mind/Brain Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218

Blake, David T., Kenneth O. Johnson, and Steven S. Hsiao. Monkey cutaneous SAI and RA responses to raised and depressed scanned patterns: effects of width, height, orientation, and a raised surround. J. Neurophysiol. 78: 2503-2517, 1997. The aim of this study was to examine the slowly adapting type I (SAI) and rapidly adapting (RA) primary afferent representation of raised and depressed surface features. Isolated, raised, and depressed squares and small raised squares with a circular surround were scanned across the receptive fields of SAI and RA mechanoreceptive afferents innervating the distal fingerpads of the rhesus monkey. Pattern height ranged from 620 to +620 µm and width ranged from 0.2 to 7.0 mm. The surround radii ranged from 3.0 to 7.0 mm. Previous combined psychophysical and neurophysiological studies have provided evidence that SAI afferent responses are responsible for the perception of spatial form and texture and that RA afferents are responsible for the detection of stimuli that produce minute skin motion (flutter, slip, microgeometric surface features). Our results strengthen these hypotheses. Response properties shared by both SAI and RA afferent types were that both responded only to the edges of the larger raised and depressed patterns, both responded to falling edges half as vigorously as to rising edges, both responded to rising and falling edges with impulse rates that were proportional to the sine of the angle between the edge and the scanning direction, and both had suppressed responses to a small raised surface feature when a raised surround was closer than 6 mm. Response differences consistent with the hypothesis that SAI afferents are specialized for the representation of form were that SAI responses were confined to areas around the features that evoked them in areas that were 40-50% smaller than the comparable RA response areas, SAI responses were more than four times more sensitive to stimulus height than were RA afferents over the range from 280 to 620 µm, and SAI (but not RA) afferents responded 20-50% more vigorously to corners than to edges. Response differences consistent with the hypothesis that RA afferents are specialized for the detection of minute surfaces features were that only RA afferents responded to very small surface depressions, depressed squares 0.8 mm wide, that were detectable by palpation. Mechanisms underlying the many differences in SAI and RA response properties are discussed.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. J. Berryman, J. M. Yau, and S. S. Hsiao Representation of Object Size in the Somatosensory System J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2006; 96(1): 27 - 39. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. C. Leiser and K. A. Moxon Relationship Between Physiological Response Type (RA and SA) and Vibrissal Receptive Field of Neurons Within the Rat Trigeminal Ganglion J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2006; 95(5): 3129 - 3145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. T. Blake and M. M. Merzenich Changes of AI Receptive Fields With Sound Density J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2002; 88(6): 3409 - 3420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. Friedman, P. S. Khalsa, K. W. Greenquist, and R. H. LaMotte Neural Coding of the Location and Direction of a Moving Object by a Spatially Distributed Population of Mechanoreceptors J. Neurosci., November 1, 2002; 22(21): 9556 - 9566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. E. Wheat and A. W. Goodwin Tactile Discrimination of Edge Shape: Limits on Spatial Resolution Imposed by Parameters of the Peripheral Neural Population J. Neurosci., October 1, 2001; 21(19): 7751 - 7763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Pare, R. Elde, J. E. Mazurkiewicz, A. M. Smith, and F. L. Rice The Meissner Corpuscle Revised: A Multiafferented Mechanoreceptor with Nociceptor Immunochemical Properties J. Neurosci., September 15, 2001; 21(18): 7236 - 7246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Bisley, A. W. Goodwin, and H. E. Wheat Slowly Adapting Type I Afferents From the Sides and End of the Finger Respond to Stimuli on the Center of the Fingerpad J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2000; 84(1): 57 - 64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Vega-Bermudez and K. O. Johnson SA1 and RA Receptive Fields, Response Variability, and Population Responses Mapped with a Probe Array J Neurophysiol, June 1, 1999; 81(6): 2701 - 2710. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Vega-Bermudez and K. O. Johnson Surround Suppression in the Responses of Primate SA1 and RA Mechanoreceptive Afferents Mapped with a Probe Array J Neurophysiol, June 1, 1999; 81(6): 2711 - 2719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. DiCarlo and K. O. Johnson Velocity Invariance of Receptive Field Structure in Somatosensory Cortical Area 3b of the Alert Monkey J. Neurosci., January 1, 1999; 19(1): 401 - 419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. H. Lamotte, R. M. Friedman, C. Lu, P. S. Khalsa, and M. A. Srinivasan Raised Object on a Planar Surface Stroked Across the Fingerpad: Responses of Cutaneous Mechanoreceptors to Shape and Orientation J Neurophysiol, November 1, 1998; 80(5): 2446 - 2466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. DiCarlo, K. O. Johnson, and S. S. Hsiao Structure of Receptive Fields in Area 3b of Primary Somatosensory Cortex in the Alert Monkey J. Neurosci., April 1, 1998; 18(7): 2626 - 2645. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]