JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 78: 2881-2888, 1997;
0022-3077/97 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (39)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goodwin, A. W.
Right arrow Articles by Bisley, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goodwin, A. W.
Right arrow Articles by Bisley, J. W.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 78 No. 6 December 1997, pp. 2881-2888
Copyright ©1997 The American Physiological Society

Encoding of Object Curvature by Tactile Afferents From Human Fingers

A. W. Goodwin1, V. G. Macefield2, and J. W. Bisley1

1 Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052; and 2 Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute, Randwick, New South Wales 2031, Australia

Goodwin, A. W., V. G. Macefield, and J. W. Bisley. Encoding of object curvature by tactile afferents from human fingers. J. Neurophysiol. 78: 2881-2888, 1997. Isolated responses were recorded from fibers in the median nerves of human subjects by using microneurography. Mechanoreceptive afferent fibers with receptive fields on the fingerpads were selected. The fingers were immobilized and spherical stimuli were applied passively to the receptive field with a contact force of 40-, 60-, or 80-g weight. The radii of the spheres were 1.92, 2.94, 5.81, or 12.4 mm or infinity  (flat); the corresponding curvatures, given by the reciprocal of the radii, were 694, 340, 172, 80.6, or 0 m-1, respectively. When the spheres were applied to the receptive field center of slowly adapting type I afferents (SAIs), the response increased as the curvature of the sphere increased and also increased as the contact force increased. All SAIs behaved in the same way except for a scaling factor proportional to the sensitivity of the afferent. When a sphere was located at different positions in the receptive field, the shape of the resulting response profile reflected the shape of the sphere; for more curved spheres the profile was higher and narrower (increased peak and decreased width). Slowly adapting type II afferents (SAIIs) showed different response characteristics from the SAIs when spheres were applied to their receptive field centers. As the curvature of the stimulus increased from 80.6 to 172 m-1, the response increased. However, further increases in curvature did not result in further increases in response. An increase in contact force resulted in an increase in the response of SAIIs; this increase was proportionately greater than it was for SAIs. For SAIIs, the shape of the receptive field profile did not change when the curvature of the stimulus changed. For fast-adapting type I afferents (FAIs), the responses were small and did not change systematically with changes in curvature or contact force. Fast-adapting type II afferents (FAIIs) did not respond to our stimuli. Human SAIs, FAIs, and FAIIs behaved like monkey SAIs, FAIs, and FAIIs, respectively. The response of the SAI population contains accurate information about the shape of the sphere and its position of contact on the finger and also indicates contact force. Conversely, whereas SAIIs possess a greater capacity to encode changes in contact force, they provide only coarse information on local shape.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Atten Percept PsychophysHome page
S. J. Lederman and R. L. Klatzky
Haptic perception: A tutorial
Atten Percept Psychophys, October 1, 2009; 71(7): 1439 - 1459.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
H. P. Saal, S. Vijayakumar, and R. S. Johansson
Information about Complex Fingertip Parameters in Individual Human Tactile Afferent Neurons
J. Neurosci., June 24, 2009; 29(25): 8022 - 8031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. P. Gardner, K. S. Babu, S. Ghosh, A. Sherwood, and J. Chen
Neurophysiology of Prehension. III. Representation of Object Features in Posterior Parietal Cortex of the Macaque Monkey
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3708 - 3730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
O. Schuhfried, C. Mittermaier, T. Jovanovic, K. Pieber, and T. Paternostro-Sluga
Effects of whole-body vibration in patients with multiple sclerosis: a pilot study
Clinical Rehabilitation, August 1, 2005; 19(8): 834 - 842.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. Y. P. Henriques and J. F. Soechting
Approaches to the Study of Haptic Sensing
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2005; 93(6): 3036 - 3043.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
H. E. Wheat, L. M. Salo, and A. W. Goodwin
Human Ability to Scale and Discriminate Forces Typical of Those Occurring during Grasp and Manipulation
J. Neurosci., March 31, 2004; 24(13): 3394 - 3401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
P A McNulty and V G Macefield
Modulation of ongoing EMG by different classes of low-threshold mechanoreceptors in the human hand
J. Physiol., December 15, 2001; 537(3): 1021 - 1032.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
I. Birznieks, P. Jenmalm, A. W. Goodwin, and R. S. Johansson
Encoding of Direction of Fingertip Forces by Human Tactile Afferents
J. Neurosci., October 15, 2001; 21(20): 8222 - 8237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
H. E. Wheat and A. W. Goodwin
Tactile Discrimination of Edge Shape: Limits on Spatial Resolution Imposed by Parameters of the Peripheral Neural Population
J. Neurosci., October 1, 2001; 21(19): 7751 - 7763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. Jenmalm, S. Dahlstedt, and R. S. Johansson
Visual and Tactile Information About Object-Curvature Control Fingertip Forces and Grasp Kinematics in Human Dexterous Manipulation
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2000; 84(6): 2984 - 2997.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
H. E. Wheat and A. W. Goodwin
Tactile Discrimination of Gaps by Slowly Adapting Afferents: Effects of Population Parameters and Anisotropy in the Fingerpad
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2000; 84(3): 1430 - 1444.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. W. Bisley, A. W. Goodwin, and H. E. Wheat
Slowly Adapting Type I Afferents From the Sides and End of the Finger Respond to Stimuli on the Center of the Fingerpad
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2000; 84(1): 57 - 64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. S. Khalsa, C. Zhang, and Y.-X. Qin
Encoding of Location and Intensity of Noxious Indentation Into Rat Skin by Spatial Populations of Cutaneous Mechano-Nociceptors
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2000; 83(5): 3049 - 3061.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. W. Goodwin and H. E. Wheat
Effects of Nonuniform Fiber Sensitivity, Innervation Geometry, and Noise on Information Relayed by a Population of Slowly Adapting Type I Primary Afferents from the Fingerpad
J. Neurosci., September 15, 1999; 19(18): 8057 - 8070.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. Jenmalm, A. W. Goodwin, and R. S. Johansson
Control of Grasp Stability When Humans Lift Objects With Different Surface Curvatures
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 1998; 79(4): 1643 - 1652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online