JN Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 78: 2904-2915, 1997;
0022-3077/97 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Recanzone, G. H.
Right arrow Articles by Schwarz, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Recanzone, G. H.
Right arrow Articles by Schwarz, U.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 78 No. 6 December 1997, pp. 2904-2915
Copyright ©1997 The American Physiological Society

Responses of MT and MST Neurons to One and Two Moving Objects in the Receptive Field

G. H. Recanzone1, R. H. Wurtz2, and U. Schwarz2

1 Center for Neuroscience, Section of Neurobiology, Physiology, and Behavior, University of California, Davis, California 95616; and 2 Laboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892

Recanzone, G. H., R. H. Wurtz, and U. Schwarz. Responses of MT and MST neurons to one and two moving objects in the receptive field. J. Neurophysiol. 78: 2904-2915, 1997. To test the effects of complex visual motion stimuli on the responses of single neurons in the middle temporal visual area (MT) and the medial superior temporal area (MST) of the macaque monkey, we compared the response elicited by one object in motion through the receptive field with the response of two simultaneously presented objects moving in different directions through the receptive field. There was an increased response to a stimulus moving in a direction other than the best direction when it was paired with a stimulus moving in the best direction. This increase was significant for all directions of motion of the non-best stimulus and the magnitude of the difference increased as the difference in the directions of the two stimuli increased. Similarly, there was a decreased response to a stimulus moving in a non-null direction when it was paired with a stimulus moving in the null direction. This decreased response in MT did not reach significance unless the second stimulus added to the null direction moved in the best direction, whereas in MST the decrease was significant when the second stimulus direction differed from the null by 90° or more. Further analysis showed that the two-object responses were better predicted by taking the averaged response of the neuron to the two single-object stimuli than by summation, multiplication, or vector addition of the responses to each of the two single-object stimuli. Neurons in MST showed larger modulations than did neurons in MT with stimuli moving in both the best direction and in the null direction and the average better predicted the two-object response in area MST than in area MT. This indicates that areas MT and MST probably use a similar integrative mechanisms to create their responses to complex moving visual stimuli, but that this mechanism is further refined in MST. These experiments show that neurons in both MT and MST integrate the motion of all directions in their responses to complex moving stimuli. These results with the motion of objects were in sound agreement with those previously reported with the use of random dot patterns for the study of transparent motion in MT and suggest that these neurons use similar computational mechanisms in the processing of object and global motion stimuli.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
X. Huang, T. D. Albright, and G. R. Stoner
Stimulus Dependency and Mechanisms of Surround Modulation in Cortical Area MT
J. Neurosci., December 17, 2008; 28(51): 13889 - 13906.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
K. Moutoussis and S. Zeki
Motion processing, directional selectivity, and conscious visual perception in the human brain
PNAS, October 21, 2008; 105(42): 16362 - 16367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. Zoccolan, M. Kouh, T. Poggio, and J. J. DiCarlo
Trade-Off between Object Selectivity and Tolerance in Monkey Inferotemporal Cortex
J. Neurosci., November 7, 2007; 27(45): 12292 - 12307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. C. Alvarado, J. W. Vaughan, T. R. Stanford, and B. E. Stein
Multisensory Versus Unisensory Integration: Contrasting Modes in the Superior Colliculus
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2007; 97(5): 3193 - 3205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
C. Jacques and B. Rossion
Electrophysiological Evidence for Temporal Dissociation between Spatial Attention and Sensory Competition during Human Face Processing
Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2007; 17(5): 1055 - 1065.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Fallah, G. R. Stoner, and J. H. Reynolds
Stimulus-specific competitive selection in macaque extrastriate visual area V4
PNAS, March 6, 2007; 104(10): 4165 - 4169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
N. W. Roach and J. H. Hogben
Impaired filtering of behaviourally irrelevant visual information in dyslexia
Brain, March 1, 2007; 130(3): 771 - 785.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
N. J. Majaj, M. Carandini, and J. A. Movshon
Motion Integration by Neurons in Macaque MT Is Local, Not Global
J. Neurosci., January 10, 2007; 27(2): 366 - 370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
D. J. Logan and C. J. Duffy
Cortical Area MSTd Combines Visual Cues to Represent 3-D Self-Movement
Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2006; 16(10): 1494 - 1507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
X. Li and M. A. Basso
Competitive Stimulus Interactions within Single Response Fields of Superior Colliculus Neurons
J. Neurosci., December 7, 2005; 25(49): 11357 - 11373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. Zoccolan, D. D. Cox, and J. J. DiCarlo
Multiple Object Response Normalization in Monkey Inferotemporal Cortex
J. Neurosci., September 7, 2005; 25(36): 8150 - 8164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. A. Perge, B. G. Borghuis, R. J. E. Bours, M. J. M. Lankheet, and R. J. A. van Wezel
Temporal Dynamics of Direction Tuning in Motion-Sensitive Macaque Area MT
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2005; 93(4): 2104 - 2116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. C. Pack, A. J. Gartland, and R. T. Born
Integration of Contour and Terminator Signals in Visual Area MT of Alert Macaque
J. Neurosci., March 31, 2004; 24(13): 3268 - 3280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. W. Bisley, D. Zaksas, J. A. Droll, and T. Pasternak
Activity of Neurons in Cortical Area MT During a Memory for Motion Task
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2004; 91(1): 286 - 300.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
L. Pessoa, S. Kastner, and L. G. Ungerleider
Neuroimaging Studies of Attention: From Modulation of Sensory Processing to Top-Down Control
J. Neurosci., May 15, 2003; 23(10): 3990 - 3998.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
H. W. Heuer and K. H. Britten
Contrast Dependence of Response Normalization in Area MT of the Rhesus Macaque
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2002; 88(6): 3398 - 3408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. Kastner, P. De Weerd, M. A. Pinsk, M. I. Elizondo, R. Desimone, and L. G. Ungerleider
Modulation of Sensory Suppression: Implications for Receptive Field Sizes in the Human Visual Cortex
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2001; 86(3): 1398 - 1411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
V. P. Ferrera
Task-Dependent Modulation of the Sensorimotor Transformation for Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2000; 84(6): 2725 - 2738.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. H. Recanzone, D. C. Guard, M. L. Phan, and T.-I K. Su
Correlation Between the Activity of Single Auditory Cortical Neurons and Sound-Localization Behavior in the Macaque Monkey
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2000; 83(5): 2723 - 2739.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. H. Recanzone and R. H. Wurtz
Effects of Attention on MT and MST Neuronal Activity During Pursuit Initiation
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2000; 83(2): 777 - 790.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. Kahlon and S. G. Lisberger
Vector Averaging Occurs Downstream from Learning in Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements of Monkeys
J. Neurosci., October 15, 1999; 19(20): 9039 - 9053.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. H. Recanzone and R. H. Wurtz
Shift in Smooth Pursuit Initiation and MT and MST Neuronal Activity Under Different Stimulus Conditions
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 1999; 82(4): 1710 - 1727.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
K. H. Britten and H. W. Heuer
Spatial Summation in the Receptive Fields of MT Neurons
J. Neurosci., June 15, 1999; 19(12): 5074 - 5084.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
K. Zhang and T. J. Sejnowski
A Theory of Geometric Constraints on Neural Activity for Natural Three-Dimensional Movement
J. Neurosci., April 15, 1999; 19(8): 3122 - 3145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. H. Reynolds, L. Chelazzi, and R. Desimone
Competitive Mechanisms Subserve Attention in Macaque Areas V2 and V4
J. Neurosci., March 1, 1999; 19(5): 1736 - 1753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online