JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 78: 2985-2998, 1997;
0022-3077/97 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gottlieb, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Corcos, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gottlieb, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Corcos, D.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 78 No. 6 December 1997, pp. 2985-2998
Copyright ©1997 The American Physiological Society

Directional Control of Planar Human Arm Movement

Gerald L. Gottlieb1, Qilai Song1, Gil L. Almeida2, Di-An Hong3, and Daniel Corcos4, 5

1 NeuroMuscular Research Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachussetts 02215;2 Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, 13100 Brazil; 3 Corporate Manufacturing Research Center, Motorola, Schaumburg, Illinois 60196; 4 School of Kinesiology (M/C 194), University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60680; and5 Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush Medical College, Chicago, Illinois 60612

Gottlieb, Gerald L., Qilai Song, Gil L. Almeida, Di-an Hong, and Daniel Corcos. Directional control of planar human arm movement. J. Neurophysiol. 78: 2985-2998, 1997. We examined the patterns of joint kinematics and torques in two kinds of sagittal plane reaching movements. One consisted of movements from a fixed initial position with the arm partially outstretched, to different targets, equidistant from the initial position and located according to the hours of a clock. The other series added movements from different initial positions and directions and >40-80 cm distances. Dynamic muscle torque was calculated by inverse dynamic equations with the gravitational components removed. In making movements in almost every direction, the dynamic components of the muscle torques at both the elbow and shoulder were related almost linearly to each other. Both were similarly shaped, biphasic, almost synchronous and symmetrical pulses. These findings are consistent with our previously reported observations, which we termed a linear synergy. The relative scaling of the two joint torques changes continuously and regularly with movement direction. This was confirmed by calculating a vector defined by the dynamic components of the shoulder and elbow torques. The vector rotates smoothly about an ellipse in intrinsic, joint torque space as the direction of hand motion rotates about a circle in extrinsic Cartesian space. This confirms a second implication of linear synergy that the scaling constant between the linearly related joint torques is directionally dependent. Multiple linear regression showed that the torque at each joint scales as a simple linear function of the angular displacement at both joints, in spite of the complex nonlinear dynamics of multijoint movement. The coefficients of this function are independent of the initial arm position and movement distance and are the same for all subjects. This is an unanticipated finding. We discuss these observations in terms of the hypothesis that voluntary, multiple degrees of freedom, rapid reaching movements may use rule-based, feed-forward control of dynamic joint torque. Rule-based control of joint torque with separate dynamic and static controllers is an alternative to models such as those based on the equilibrium point hypotheses that rely on a positionally based controller to produce both dynamic and static torque components. It is also an alternative to feed-forward models that directly solve the problems of inverse dynamics. Our experimental findings are not necessarily incompatible with any of the alternative models, but they describe new, additional findings for which we need to account. The rules are chosen by the nervous system according to features of the kinematic task to couple muscle contraction at the shoulder and elbow in a linear synergy. Speed and load control preserves the relative magnitudes of the dynamic torques while directional control is accomplished by modulating them in a differential manner. This control system operates in parallel with a positional control system that solves the problems of postural stability.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. A. Scheidt and C. Ghez
Separate Adaptive Mechanisms for Controlling Trajectory and Final Position in Reaching
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3600 - 3613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. Guigon, P. Baraduc, and M. Desmurget
Computational Motor Control: Redundancy and Invariance
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 331 - 347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. d'Avella, A. Portone, L. Fernandez, and F. Lacquaniti
Control of fast-reaching movements by muscle synergy combinations.
J. Neurosci., July 26, 2006; 26(30): 7791 - 7810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. S. Thomas, D. M. Corcos, and Z. Hasan
Kinematic and Kinetic Constraints on Arm, Trunk, and Leg Segments in Target-Reaching Movements
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2005; 93(1): 352 - 364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. B. Debicki and P. L. Gribble
Inter-Joint Coupling Strategy During Adaptation to Novel Viscous Loads in Human Arm Movement
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2004; 92(2): 754 - 765.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. Pigeon, S. B. Bortolami, P. DiZio, and J. R. Lackner
Coordinated Turn-and-Reach Movements. I. Anticipatory Compensation for Self-Generated Coriolis and Interaction Torques
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2003; 89(1): 276 - 289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. W. Krakauer, Z. M. Pine, M.-F. Ghilardi, and C. Ghez
Learning of Visuomotor Transformations for Vectorial Planning of Reaching Trajectories
J. Neurosci., December 1, 2000; 20(23): 8916 - 8924.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. L. Almeida, D. M. Corcos, and Z. Hasan
Horizontal-Plane Arm Movements With Direction Reversals Performed by Normal Individuals and Individuals With Down Syndrome
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2000; 84(4): 1949 - 1960.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. F. Koshland, J. C. Galloway, and C. J. Nevoret-Bell
Control of the Wrist in Three-Joint Arm Movements to Multiple Directions in the Horizontal Plane
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2000; 83(5): 3188 - 3195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
F. T.J.M. Zaal, K. Daigle, G. L. Gottlieb, and E. Thelen
An Unlearned Principle for Controlling Natural Movements
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 1999; 82(1): 255 - 259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online