JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 78: 3047-3060, 1997;
0022-3077/97 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ashley-Ross, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lauder, G. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ashley-Ross, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lauder, G. V.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 78 No. 6 December 1997, pp. 3047-3060
Copyright ©1997 The American Physiological Society

Motor Patterns and Kinematics During Backward Walking in the Pacific Giant Salamander: Evidence for Novel Motor Output

Miriam A. Ashley-Ross and George V. Lauder

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, California 92697

Ashley-Ross, Miriam A. and George V. Lauder. Motor patterns and kinematics during backward walking in the Pacific Giant Salamander: evidence for novel motor output. J. Neurophysiol. 78: 3047-3060, 1997. Kinematic and motor patterns during forward and backward walking in the salamander Dicamptodon tenebrosus were compared to determine whether the differences seen in mammals also apply to a lower vertebrate with sprawling posture and to measure the flexibility of motor output by tetrapod central pattern generators. During treadmill locomotion, electromyograms (EMGs) were recorded from hindlimb muscles of Dicamptodon while simultaneous high-speed video records documented movement of the body, thigh, and crus and allowed EMGs to be synchronized to limb movements. In forward locomotion, the trunk was lifted above the treadmill surface. The pelvic girdle and trunk underwent smooth side-to-side oscillations throughout the stride. At the beginning of the stance phase, the femur was protracted and the knee joint extended. The knee joint initially flexed in early stance and then extended as the foot pushed off in late stance, reaching maximum extension just before foot lift-off. The femur retracted steadily throughout the stance. In the swing phase, the femur rapidly protracted, and the leg was brought forward in an "overhand crawl" motion. In backward walking, the body frequently remained in contact with the treadmill surface. The pelvic girdle, trunk, and femur remained relatively still during stance phase, and most motion occurred at the knee joint. The knee joint extended throughout most of stance, as the body moved back, away from the stationary foot. The knee flexed during swing. Four of five angles showed significantly smaller ranges in backward than in forward walking. EMGs of forward walking showed that ventral muscles were coactive, beginning activity just before foot touchdown and ceasing during the middle of stance phase. Dorsal muscles were active primarily during swing. Backward locomotion showed a different pattern; all muscles except one showed primary activity during the swing phase. This pattern of muscle synergy in backward walking never was seen in forward locomotion. Also, several muscles demonstrated lower burst rectified integrated areas (RIA) or durations during backward locomotion. Multivariate statistical analysis of EMG onset and RIA completely separated forward and backward walking along the first principal component, based on higher RIAs, longer durations of muscle activity, and greater synergy between ventral muscles during early stance in forward walking. Backward walking in Dicamptodon uses a novel motor pattern not seen during forward walking in salamanders or during any other locomotor activity in previously studied tetrapods. The central neuronal mechanisms mediating locomotion in this primitive tetrapod are thus capable of considerable plasticity.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
D. M. Neustadter, R. L. Herman, R. F. Drushel, D. W. Chestek, and H. J. Chiel
The kinematics of multifunctionality: comparisons of biting and swallowing in Aplysia californica
J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2007; 210(2): 238 - 260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
H. Ye, D. W. Morton, and H. J. Chiel
Neuromechanics of Multifunctionality during Rejection in Aplysia californica.
J. Neurosci., October 18, 2006; 26(42): 10743 - 10755.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. S.G. Stein and S. Daniels-McQueen
Timing of Knee-Related Spinal Neurons During Fictive Rostral Scratching in the Turtle
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2003; 90(6): 3585 - 3593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
W. O. Bennett, R. S. Simons, and E. L. Brainerd
Twisting and Bending: The Functional Role of Salamander Lateral Hypaxial Musculature During Locomotion
J. Exp. Biol., January 6, 2001; 204(11): 1979 - 1989.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. M. Earhart and P. S. G. Stein
Step, Swim, and Scratch Motor Patterns in the Turtle
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2000; 84(5): 2181 - 2190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. H. Ting, S. A. Kautz, D. A. Brown, and F. E. Zajac
Phase Reversal of Biomechanical Functions and Muscle Activity in Backward Pedaling
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 1999; 81(2): 544 - 551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online