The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 78 No. 6 December 1997, pp. 3107-3116
Copyright ©1997 The American Physiological Society

Mechanisms of Electrical Coupling Between Pyramidal Cells

Edward J. Vigmond¹, Jose L. Perez Velazquez², Taufik A. Valiante², BERJ L. Bardakjian¹, and Peter L. Carlen²

¹  Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto M5S 3G9; and ²  Playfair Neuroscience Unit and Bloorview Epilepsy Program, Toronto HospitalWestern Division, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5T 2S8, Canada

Vigmond, Edward J., Jose L. Perez Velazquez, Taufik A. Valiante, Berj L. Bardakjian, and Peter L. Carlen. Mechanisms of electrical coupling between pyramidal cells. J. Neurophysiol. 78: 3107-3116, 1997. Direct electrical coupling between neurons can be the result of both electrotonic current transfer through gap junctions and extracellular fields. Intracellular recordings from CA1 pyramidal neurons of rat hippocampal slices showed two different types of small-amplitude coupling potentials: short-duration (5 ms) biphasic spikelets, which resembled differentiated action potentials and long-duration (>20 ms) monophasic potentials. A three-dimensional morphological model of a pyramidal cell was employed to determine the extracellular field produced by a neuron and its effect on a nearby neuron resulting from both gap junctional and electric field coupling. Computations were performed with a novel formulation of the boundary element method that employs triangular elements to discretize the soma and cylindrical elements to discretize the dendrites. An analytic formula was derived to aid in computations involving cylindrical elements. Simulation results were compared with biological recordings of intracellular potentials and spikelets. Field effects produced waveforms resembling spikelets although of smaller magnitude than those recorded in vitro. Gap junctional electrotonic connections produced waveforms resembling small-amplitude excitatory postsynaptic potentials. Intracellular electrode measurements were found inadequate for ascertaining membrane events because of externally applied electric fields. The transmembrane voltage induced by the electric field was highly spatially dependent in polarity and wave shape, as well as being an order of magnitude larger than activity measured at the electrode. Membrane voltages because of electrotonic current injection across gap junctions were essentially constant over the cell and were accurately depicted by the electrode. The effects of several parameters were investigated: 1) decreasing the ratio of intra to extracellular conductivity reduced the field effects; 2) the tree structure had a major impact on the intracellular potential; 3) placing the gap junction in the dendrites introduced a time delay in the gap junctional mediated electrotonic potential, as well as deceasing the potential recorded by the somatic electrode; and 4) field effects decayed to one-half of their maximum strength at a cell separation of ~20 µm. Results indicate that the in vitro measured spikelets are unlikely to be mediated by gap junctions and that a spikelet produced by the electric field of a single source cell has the same waveshape as the measured spikelet but with a much smaller amplitude. It is hypothesized that spikelets are a manifestation of the simultaneous electric field effects from several local cells whose action potential firing is synchronized.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				X.-L. Zhang, L. Zhang, and P. L. Carlen Electrotonic coupling between stratum oriens interneurones in the intact in vitro mouse juvenile hippocampus J. Physiol., August 1, 2004; 558(3): 825 - 839. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. Fox, M. Bikson, and J. G. R. Jefferys Tissue Resistance Changes and the Profile of Synchronized Neuronal Activity During Ictal Events in the Low-Calcium Model of Epilepsy J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2004; 92(1): 181 - 188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. T. Francis, B. J. Gluckman, and S. J. Schiff Sensitivity of Neurons to Weak Electric Fields J. Neurosci., August 13, 2003; 23(19): 7255 - 7261. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. C. Stacey and D. M. Durand Noise and Coupling Affect Signal Detection and Bursting in a Simulated Physiological Neural Network J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2002; 88(5): 2598 - 2611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Kohling, M. Vreugdenhil, E. Bracci, and J. G. R. Jefferys Ictal Epileptiform Activity Is Facilitated by Hippocampal GABAA Receptor-Mediated Oscillations J. Neurosci., September 15, 2000; 20(18): 6820 - 6829. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Zhang, J. L. Perez Velazquez, G. F. Tian, C.-P. Wu, F. K. Skinner, P. L. Carlen, and L. Zhang Slow Oscillations (less than equal to 1 Hz) Mediated by GABAergic Interneuronal Networks in Rat Hippocampus J. Neurosci., November 15, 1998; 18(22): 9256 - 9268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]