JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Neurophysiol 79: 371-378, 1998;
0022-3077/98 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mateika, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Fregosi, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mateika, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Fregosi, R. F.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 79 No. 1 January 1998, pp. 371-378
Copyright ©1998 The American Physiological Society

Contractile Properties of Human Nasal Dilator Motor Units

J. H. Mateika, E. G. Essif, C. Dellorusso, and R. F. Fregosi

Department of Physiology, The University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0093

Mateika, J. H., E. G. Essif, C. DelloRusso, and R. F. Fregosi. Contractile properties of human nasal dilator motor units. J. Neurophysiol. 79: 371-378, 1998. The technique of intramuscular microstimulation was used to activate facial nerve fibers while acquiring simultaneous twitch force measurements to measure the contractile properties and force-frequency responses of human nasal dilator (ND) motor units. Twitch force amplitude (TF), contraction time (CT), half-relaxation time (HRT), and the maximal rate of rise of force normalized to the peak force (maximum contraction rate, MCR) were recorded from 98 ND motor units in 37 subjects. The average CT, HRT, MCR, and TF were 47.9 ± 1.8 ms, 42.6 ± 2.1 ms, 28.6 ± 1.8 s-1, and 1.06 ± 0.1 mN, respectively. Neither CT nor HRT were significantly correlated with TF. The average CT and HRT were similar to values recorded for small muscles of the hand but were faster than the values recorded from human toe extensor motor units. However the lack of an association between twitch force and CT or HRT was similar to the findings obtained for both human hand and foot muscles. Force-frequency curves were recorded from eight ND motor units. The force produced by the eight motor units was recorded in response to stimuli delivered at 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, and 40 Hz to assess force-frequency relationships. The mean twitch force of the eight motor units was 0.91 ± 0.3 mN and the average tetanic force was 8.1 ± 1.8 mN. Therefore the average twitch force was equal to 12.7% of the tetanic force. Fifty percent of the unit tetanic force was achieved at an average frequency of 16.4 ± 1.7 Hz, which is greater than the value recorded for human toe extensor motor units (9.6 Hz). Thus the force produced by the ND motor units was more sensitive to changes in discharge frequency over the range of ~10-30 Hz and less sensitive to changes in the range of 0-10 Hz because of their fast contractile properties. The mean slope of the regression lines that were fit to the steep portion of each force-frequency curve was 5.15 ± 0.5% change in force/Hz. This value was greater than the slope measured for human toe extensor muscles (4.2% change in force/Hz). These observations suggest that force gradation by ND motor units is more sensitive to changes in stimulation frequency than human toe extensor motor units. We conclude that most ND motor units have fast contractile properties and that rate coding may play a significant role in the gradation of force produced by the ND muscle. Furthermore, the findings of this investigation have demonstrated that contractile speed and TF in a human facial muscle are not correlated. This supports previous findings obtained from human hand and foot muscles and suggests that there may be a fundamental difference in the contractile speed-twitch force relationship between many human muscles and most muscles of other mammals.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. Schmitt, C. DelloRusso, and R. F. Fregosi
Force-EMG Changes During Sustained Contractions of a Human Upper Airway Muscle
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2009; 101(2): 558 - 568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. G. Lapatki, R. Oostenveld, J. P. Van Dijk, I. E. Jonas, M. J. Zwarts, and D. F. Stegeman
Topographical Characteristics of Motor Units of the Lower Facial Musculature Revealed by Means of High-Density Surface EMG
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2006; 95(1): 342 - 354.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. J. Sokoloff
Localization and Contractile Properties of Intrinsic Longitudinal Motor Units of the Rat Tongue
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2000; 84(2): 827 - 835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. J. Fuglevand, V. G. Macefield, and B. Bigland-Ritchie
Force-Frequency and Fatigue Properties of Motor Units in Muscles That Control Digits of the Human Hand
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 1999; 81(4): 1718 - 1729.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online