The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 79 No. 1 January 1998, pp. 64-72
Copyright ©1998 The American Physiological Society

Interaction of the Two Frontal Eye Fields Before Saccade Onset

J. Schlag, P. Dassonville, and M. Schlag-Rey

Department of Neurobiology and Brain Research Institute, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90095-1763

Schlag, J., P. Dassonville, and M. Schlag-Rey. Interaction of the two frontal eye fields before saccade onset. J. Neurophysiol. 79: 64-72, 1998. A normal environment often contains many objects of interest that compete to attract our gaze. Nevertheless, instead of initiating a flurry of conflicting signals, central populations of oculomotor neurons always seem to agree on the destination of the next saccade. How is such a consensus achieved? In a unit recording and microstimulation study on trained monkeys, we sought to elucidate the mechanism through which saccade-related cells in the frontal eye fields (FEF) avoid issuing competing commands. Presaccadic neuronal activity was recorded in one FEF while stimulating the contralateral FEF with low-intensity currents that evoked saccades. When an eye-movement cell was isolated, we determined: the movement field of the cell, the cell's response to contralateral FEF microstimulation, the cell's response when the evoked saccade was in the preferred direction of the cell (using the collision technique to deviate appropriately the evoked saccade vector), and the cell's response to a stimulation applied during a saccade in the cell's preferred direction, to reveal a possible inhibitory effect. Complete results were obtained for 71 stimulation-recording pairs of FEF sites. The unit responses observed were distributed as follows: 35% of the cells were unaffected, 37% were inhibited, and 20% excited by contralateral stimulation. These response types depended on the site of contralateral stimulation and did not vary when saccades were redirected by collision. This invariant excitation or inhibition of cells, seemingly due to hardwired connections, depended on the angular difference between their preferred vector and the vector represented by the cells stimulated. By contrast, 8% of the cells were either activated or inhibited depending on the vector of the saccade actually evoked by collision. These results suggest that the consensus between cells of oculomotor structures at the time of saccade initiation is implemented by functional connections such that the cells that command similar movements mutually excite each other while silencing those that would produce conflicting movements. Such a rule would be an effective implementation of a winner-take-all mechanism well suited to prevent conflicts.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. E. Curtis and J. D. Connolly Saccade Preparation Signals in the Human Frontal and Parietal Cortices J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2008; 99(1): 133 - 145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.F.W. Neggers, W. Huijbers, C. M. Vrijlandt, B.N.S. Vlaskamp, D.J.L.G. Schutter, and J. L. Kenemans TMS Pulses on the Frontal Eye Fields Break Coupling Between Visuospatial Attention and Eye Movements J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2007; 98(5): 2765 - 2778. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. L. Kimmel and T. Moore Temporal Patterning of Saccadic Eye Movement Signals J. Neurosci., July 18, 2007; 27(29): 7619 - 7630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Izawa, H. Suzuki, and Y. Shinoda Suppression of Visually and Memory-Guided Saccades Induced by Electrical Stimulation of the Monkey Frontal Eye Field. I. Suppression of Ipsilateral Saccades J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2004; 92(4): 2248 - 2260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Amador, M. Schlag-Rey, and J. Schlag Primate Antisaccade. II. Supplementary Eye Field Neuronal Activity Predicts Correct Performance J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2004; 91(4): 1672 - 1689. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Moore and M. Fallah Microstimulation of the Frontal Eye Field and Its Effects on Covert Spatial Attention J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2004; 91(1): 152 - 162. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. Sharma, V. Dragoi, J. B. Tenenbaum, E. K. Miller, and M. Sur V1 Neurons Signal Acquisition of an Internal Representation of Stimulus Location Science, June 13, 2003; 300(5626): 1758 - 1763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Seidemann, A. Arieli, A. Grinvald, and H. Slovin Dynamics of Depolarization and Hyperpolarization in the Frontal Cortex and Saccade Goal Science, February 1, 2002; 295(5556): 862 - 865. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Xing and R. A. Andersen Memory Activity of LIP Neurons for Sequential Eye Movements Simulated With Neural Networks J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2000; 84(2): 651 - 665. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. J. Ploner, S. Rivaud-Pechoux, B. M. Gaymard, Y. Agid, and C. Pierrot-Deseilligny Errors of Memory-Guided Saccades in Humans With Lesions of the Frontal Eye Field and the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 1086 - 1090. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. C. Dias and M. A. Segraves Muscimol-Induced Inactivation of Monkey Frontal Eye Field: Effects on Visually and Memory-Guided Saccades J Neurophysiol, May 1, 1999; 81(5): 2191 - 2214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Makeig, M. Westerfield, T.-P. Jung, J. Covington, J. Townsend, T. J. Sejnowski, and E. Courchesne Functionally Independent Components of the Late Positive Event-Related Potential during Visual Spatial Attention J. Neurosci., April 1, 1999; 19(7): 2665 - 2680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Amador, M. Schlag-Rey, and J. Schlag Primate Antisaccades. I. Behavioral Characteristics J Neurophysiol, October 1, 1998; 80(4): 1775 - 1786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]