JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Neurophysiol 79: 879-890, 1998;
0022-3077/98 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, Y. E.
Right arrow Articles by Knudsen, E. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, Y. E.
Right arrow Articles by Knudsen, E. I.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 79 No. 2 February 1998, pp. 879-890
Copyright ©1998 The American Physiological Society

Representation of Binaural Spatial Cues in Field L of the Barn Owl Forebrain

Yale E. Cohen and Eric I. Knudsen

Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-5401

Cohen, Yale E. and Eric I. Knudsen. Representation of binaural spatial cues in Field L of the barn owl forebrain. J. Neurophysiol. 79: 879-890, 1998. This study examined the representation of spatial information in the barn owl Field L, the first telencephalic processing stage of the classical auditory pathway. Field L units were recorded extracellularly, and their responses to dichotically presented interaural time differences (ITD) and interaural level differences (ILD) were tested. We observed a variety of tuning profiles in Field L. Some sites were not sensitive to ITD or ILD. Other sites, especially those in the high-frequency region, were highly selective for values of ITD and ILD. These sites had multipeaked (commonly called "phase ambiguous") ITD tuning profiles and were tuned for a single value of ILD. The tuning properties of these sites are similar to those seen in the lateral shell of the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus. Although the tuning properties of Field L sites were similar to those observed in the inferior colliculus, the functional organization of this spatial information was fundamentally different. Whereas in the inferior colliculus spatial information is organized into global topographics maps, in Field L spatial information is organized into local clusters, with sites having similar binaural tuning properties grouped together. The representation of binaural cues in Field L suggests that it is involved in auditory space processing but at a lower level of information processing than the auditory archistriatum, a forebrain area that is specialized for processing spatial information, and that the levels of information processing in the forebrain space processing pathway are remarkably similar to those in the well-known midbrain space processing pathway.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. L. Perez and J. L. Pena
Comparison of Midbrain and Thalamic Space-Specific Neurons in Barn Owls
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2006; 95(2): 783 - 790.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. L. Miller and E. I. Knudsen
Early Auditory Experience Induces Frequency-Specific, Adaptive Plasticity in the Forebrain Gaze Fields of the Barn Owl
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2001; 85(5): 2184 - 2194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
Y. E. Cohen, G. L. Miller, and E. I. Knudsen
Forebrain Pathway for Auditory Space Processing in the Barn Owl
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 1998; 79(2): 891 - 902.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online