The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 79 No. 2 February 1998, pp. 891-902
Copyright ©1998 The American Physiological Society

Forebrain Pathway for Auditory Space Processing in the Barn Owl

Yale E. Cohen, Greg L. Miller, and Eric I. Knudsen

Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-5401

Cohen, Yale E., Greg L. Miller, and Eric I. Knudsen. Forebrain pathway for auditory space processing in the barn owl. J. Neurophysiol. 79: 891-902, 1998. The forebrain plays an important role in many aspects of sound localization behavior. Yet, the forebrain pathway that processes auditory spatial information is not known for any species. Using standard anatomic labeling techniques, we used a "top-down" approach to trace the flow of auditory spatial information from an output area of the forebrain sound localization pathway (the auditory archistriatum, AAr), back through the forebrain, and into the auditory midbrain. Previous work has demonstrated that AAr units are specialized for auditory space processing. The results presented here show that the AAr receives afferent input from Field L both directly and indirectly via the caudolateral neostriatum. Afferent input to Field L originates mainly in the auditory thalamus, nucleus ovoidalis, which, in turn, receives input from the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus. In addition, we confirmed previously reported projections of the AAr to the basal ganglia, the external nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICX), the deep layers of the optic tectum, and various brain stem nuclei. A series of inactivation experiments demonstrated that the sharp tuning of AAr sites for binaural spatial cues depends on Field L input but not on input from the auditory space map in the midbrain ICX: pharmacological inactivation of Field L eliminated completelyauditory responses in the AAr, whereas bilateral ablation of the midbrain ICX had no appreciable effect on AAr responses. We conclude, therefore, that the forebrain sound localization pathway can process auditory spatial information independently of the midbrain localization pathway.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Reches and Y. Gutfreund Stimulus-Specific Adaptations in the Gaze Control System of the Barn Owl J. Neurosci., February 6, 2008; 28(6): 1523 - 1533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. B. Christianson and J. L. Pena Noise reduction of coincidence detector output by the inferior colliculus of the barn owl. J. Neurosci., May 31, 2006; 26(22): 5948 - 5954. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. L. Perez and J. L. Pena Comparison of Midbrain and Thalamic Space-Specific Neurons in Barn Owls J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2006; 95(2): 783 - 790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. L. Miller and E. I. Knudsen Adaptive Plasticity in the Auditory Thalamus of Juvenile Barn Owls J. Neurosci., February 1, 2003; 23(3): 1059 - 1065. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. S. Hyde and E. I. Knudsen A Topographic Instructive Signal Guides the Adjustment of the Auditory Space Map in the Optic Tectum J. Neurosci., November 1, 2001; 21(21): 8586 - 8593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. L. Miller and E. I. Knudsen Early Auditory Experience Induces Frequency-Specific, Adaptive Plasticity in the Forebrain Gaze Fields of the Barn Owl J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2001; 85(5): 2184 - 2194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. L. Miller and E. I. Knudsen Early Visual Experience Shapes the Representation of Auditory Space in the Forebrain Gaze Fields of the Barn Owl J. Neurosci., March 15, 1999; 19(6): 2326 - 2336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. E. Cohen and E. I. Knudsen Representation of Binaural Spatial Cues in Field L of the Barn Owl Forebrain J Neurophysiol, February 1, 1998; 79(2): 879 - 890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]