The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 79 No. 2 February 1998, pp. 947-963
Copyright ©1998 The American Physiological Society

Time Course and Magnitude of Movement-Related Gating of Tactile Detection in Humans. I. Importance of Stimulus Location

Stephan R. Williams^{1, 2}, Jafar Shenasa^{1, 2}, and C. Elaine Chapman^{1, 2, 3}

¹ Centre de Recherche en Sciences Neurologiques, ² Département de Physiologie, and ³ École de Réadaptation, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3J7, Canada

Williams, Stephan R., Jafar Shenasa, and C. Elaine Chapman. Time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection in humans. I. Importance of stimulus location. J. Neurophysiol. 79: 947-963, 1998. The time course and spatial extent of movement-related suppression of the detection of weak electrical stimuli (intensity, 90% detected at rest) was determined in 118 experiments carried out in 47 human subjects. Subjects were trained to perform a rapid abduction of the right index finger (D2) in response to a visual cue. Stimulus timing was calculated relative to the onset of movement and the onset of electromyographic (EMG) activity. Electrical stimulation was delivered to 10 different sites on the body, including sites on the limb performing the movement (D2, D5, hand, forearm and arm) as well as several distant sites (contralateral arm, ipsilateral leg). Detection of stimuli applied to the moving digit diminished significantly and in a time-dependent manner, with the first significant decrease occurring 120 ms before movement onset and 70 ms before the onset of EMG activity. Movement-related and time-dependent effects were obtained at all stimulation sites on the homolateral arm as well as the adjacent trunk. A pronounced spatiotemporal gradient was observed: the magnitude of the movement-related decrease in detectability was greatest and earliest at sites closest to the moving finger and progressively weaker and later at more proximal sites. When stimuli were applied to the distant sites, only a small (~10%), non-time-dependent decrease was observed during movement trials. A simple model of perceptual performance adequately described the results, providing insight into the distribution of movement-related inhibitory controls within the CNS.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. E. Chapman and E. Beauchamp Differential Controls Over Tactile Detection in Humans by Motor Commands and Peripheral Reafference J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2006; 96(3): 1664 - 1675. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. E. Chapman and E.-M. Meftah Independent Controls of Attentional Influences in Primary and Secondary Somatosensory Cortex J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2005; 94(6): 4094 - 4107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E.-M. Meftah, J. Shenasa, and C. E. Chapman Effects of a Cross-Modal Manipulation of Attention on Somatosensory Cortical Neuronal Responses to Tactile Stimuli in the Monkey J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2002; 88(6): 3133 - 3149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. R. Williams and C. E. Chapman Time Course and Magnitude of Movement-Related Gating of Tactile Detection in Humans. III. Effect of Motor Tasks J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2002; 88(4): 1968 - 1979. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. R. Williams and C. E. Chapman Time Course and Magnitude of Movement-Related Gating of Tactile Detection in Humans. II. Effects of Stimulus Intensity J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2000; 84(2): 863 - 875. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Salimi, T. Brochier, and A. M. Smith Neuronal Activity in Somatosensory Cortex of Monkeys Using a Precision Grip. I. Receptive Fields and Discharge Patterns J Neurophysiol, February 1, 1999; 81(2): 825 - 834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]