The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 79 No. 5 May 1998, pp. 2416-2431
Copyright ©1998 The American Physiological Society

IID Sensitivity Differs Between Two Principal Centers in the Interaural Intensity Difference Pathway: the LSO and the IC

Thomas J. Park

Department of Biological Sciences, Neurobiology Group, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60607

Park, Thomas J. IID sensitivity differs between two principal centers in the interaural intensity difference pathway: the LOS and the IC. J. Neurophysiol. 79: 2416-2431, 1998. Interaural intensity differences (IIDs) are the chief cues that animals use to localize high-frequency sounds. Neurons that are sensitive to IIDs are excited by sound at one ear and inhibited by sound at the other. Thus a given IID generates a combination of excitation and inhibition that is reflected in a cell's spike count. In mammals, the so-called "IID pathway" begins in the lateral superior olive (LSO), which is dominated by the type of IID-sensitive neurons just described. The LSO then sends a prominent projection to the inferior colliculus (IC), which also contains a substantial population of IID-sensitive cells. Recent pharmacological studies have suggested that the response properties of IID-sensitive neurons in the IC undergo considerable processing and thus should not simply reflect the output of the LSO. However, we have no direct evidence as to whether IID sensitivity, the defining response feature of these cells, differs at these two levels. The present study makes this direct comparison in the Mexican free-tailed bat, a species that relies greatly on high-frequency hearing and thus on IIDs for localizing sounds in space. Extracellular recording techniques were used to obtain IID functions from 50 IC neurons. Comparable data from 50 LSO cells were available from a previous study. The main result was that IID sensitivity significantly differed between cells in the LSO and the IC. Among LSO cells, sensitivity was centered ~0 dB (no intensity difference between the ears) whereas, in the IC, sensitivity was biased toward the inhibitory ear: on average, IC cells required a more intense signal at the inhibitory ear to reach the same degree of suppression as observed in LSO cells. Further analysis showed that the vast majority of IC cells (88%) exhibited a mismatch in the latencies of their inputs: inhibition arrived later when an equally strong excitation and inhibition were elicited; this reduced the effectiveness of the inhibition. Because latency shortens with increasing stimulus intensity, an IID with a more intense signal at the inhibitory ear could equate the latencies of excitation and inhibition, increasing the effectiveness of the inhibition. This result suggests that latency mismatches account, to a great extent, for the difference in sensitivity between the LSO and the IC; and when mismatches were negated by electronically time shifting the signals to the ears, sensitivity was no longer significantly different between the two nuclei.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. Siveke, M. Pecka, A. H. Seidl, S. Baudoux, and B. Grothe Binaural Response Properties of Low-Frequency Neurons in the Gerbil Dorsal Nucleus of the Lateral Lemniscus J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2006; 96(3): 1425 - 1440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. M. Hurley and G. D. Pollak Serotonin Shifts First-Spike Latencies of Inferior Colliculus Neurons J. Neurosci., August 24, 2005; 25(34): 7876 - 7886. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Marsat and G. S. Pollack Effect of the Temporal Pattern of Contralateral Inhibition on Sound Localization Cues J. Neurosci., June 29, 2005; 25(26): 6137 - 6144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. J. Park, A. Klug, M. Holinstat, and B. Grothe Interaural Level Difference Processing in the Lateral Superior Olive and the Inferior Colliculus J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2004; 92(1): 289 - 301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. J. Tollin and T. C. T. Yin The Coding of Spatial Location by Single Units in the Lateral Superior Olive of the Cat. I. Spatial Receptive Fields in Azimuth J. Neurosci., February 15, 2002; 22(4): 1454 - 1467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. J. Tollin and T. C. T. Yin The Coding of Spatial Location by Single Units in the Lateral Superior Olive of the Cat. II. The Determinants of Spatial Receptive Fields in Azimuth J. Neurosci., February 15, 2002; 22(4): 1468 - 1479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D.R.F. Irvine, V. N. Park, and L. McCormick Mechanisms Underlying the Sensitivity of Neurons in the Lateral Superior Olive to Interaural Intensity Differences J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2001; 86(6): 2647 - 2666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. Burger and G. D. Pollak Reversible Inactivation of the Dorsal Nucleus of the Lateral Lemniscus Reveals Its Role in the Processing of Multiple Sound Sources in the Inferior Colliculus of Bats J. Neurosci., July 1, 2001; 21(13): 4830 - 4843. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. B. Kelly and S. A. Kidd NMDA and AMPA Receptors in the Dorsal Nucleus of the Lateral Lemniscus Shape Binaural Responses in Rat Inferior Colliculus J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2000; 83(3): 1403 - 1414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Klug, E. E. Bauer, and G. D. Pollak Multiple Components of Ipsilaterally Evoked Inhibition in the Inferior Colliculus J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 593 - 610. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. A. Davis, R. Ramachandran, and B. J. May Single-Unit Responses in the Inferior Colliculus of Decerebrate Cats II. Sensitivity to Interaural Level Differences J Neurophysiol, July 1, 1999; 82(1): 164 - 175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. P. Oswald, A. Klug, and T. J. Park Interaural Intensity Difference Processing in Auditory Midbrain Neurons: Effects of a Transient Early Inhibitory Input J. Neurosci., February 1, 1999; 19(3): 1149 - 1163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]