JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Neurophysiol 80: 529-545, 1998;
0022-3077/98 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maalouf, M.
Right arrow Articles by Dykes, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maalouf, M.
Right arrow Articles by Dykes, R. W.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 80 No. 2 August 1998, pp. 529-545
Copyright ©1998 The American Physiological Society

Blockade of Cholinergic Receptors in Rat Barrel Cortex Prevents Long-Term Changes in the Evoked Potential During Sensory Preconditioning

M. Maalouf, A. A. Miasnikov, and R. W. Dykes

Département de Physiologie, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3J7, Canada

Maalouf, M., A. A. Miasnikov, and R. W. Dykes. Blockade of cholinergic receptors in rat barrel cortex prevents long-term changes in the evoked potential during sensory preconditioning. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 529-545, 1998. We offer evidence that acetylcholine (ACh) is involved in the emergence of functional neuronal plasticity induced by whisker pairing. Evoked potentials were recorded within the barrel cortex of awake, adult rats before, during, and after one of five paradigms. In the pairing procedure, each of 50 deflections of a whisker (S1) was followed 150 ms later by the deflection of a second whisker (S2). The explicitly unpaired control procedure differed by the lack of contiguity and contingency between the stimulation of S1 and S2. In the three remaining groups, pairing was performed 30 min after an intraperitoneal injection of either 0.5 ml of saline (150 mM NaCl), 100 mg/kg of atropine methyl nitrate (0.5 ml of AMN in saline), or 100 mg/kg of atropine sulfate (0.5 ml of ATS in saline). Changes in responsiveness to S1 were compared with, and adjusted by, changes in responsiveness to stimulation of S2. Changes in potentials evoked by S1 were interpreted as a change in neuronal excitability occurring when the first innocuous stimulus systematically predicted the appearance of the second innocuous stimulus. When whisker pairing was performed alone or in the presence of either saline or AMN (a blocker of muscarinic cholinoreceptors that does not cross the blood-brain barrier, BBB), responses to S1 increased, whereas, in the presence of ATS (blocker of muscarinic cholinoreceptors that does cross the BBB) or following the explicitly unpaired control, they decreased. The effects of saline, AMN, and ATS on the evoked potential without vibrissae pairing were opposite to those observed when these substances were injected and pairing occurred. Analysis of the behavioral state of the animal showed that the changes observed in the evoked potential could not be attributed to changes in behavioral state. The changes in responsiveness to S1 induced by whisker pairing were independent of neuronal excitability, did not occur in the absence of contingency and contiguity between S1 and S2, were blocked by the muscarinic receptor antagonist ATS, but not by blockade of muscarinic modulation of normal synaptic transmission. Thus activation of muscarinic cholinoreceptors within the CNS were a necessary condition for this form of neuronal plasticity.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
D. Fernandez de Sevilla, M. Rodrigo-Angulo, A. Nunez, and W. Buno
Cholinergic Modulation of Synaptic Transmission and Postsynaptic Excitability in the Rat Gracilis Dorsal Column Nucleus
J. Neurosci., April 12, 2006; 26(15): 4015 - 4025.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. W. Berg, B. Friedman, L. F. Schroeder, and D. Kleinfeld
Activation of Nucleus Basalis Facilitates Cortical Control of a Brain Stem Motor Program
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2005; 94(1): 699 - 711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
S. Bao, E. F. Chang, J. D. Davis, K. T. Gobeske, and M. M. Merzenich
Progressive Degradation and Subsequent Refinement of Acoustic Representations in the Adult Auditory Cortex
J. Neurosci., November 26, 2003; 23(34): 10765 - 10775.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. Sawaki, B. Boroojerdi, A. Kaelin-Lang, A. H. Burstein, C. M. Butefisch, L. Kopylev, B. Davis, and L. G. Cohen
Cholinergic Influences on Use-Dependent Plasticity
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2002; 87(1): 166 - 171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
O. Rahimi and S. L. Juliano
Transplants of NGF-Secreting Fibroblasts Restore Stimulus-Evoked Activity in Barrel Cortex of Basal-Forebrain-Lesioned Rats
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2001; 86(4): 2081 - 2096.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
V. Ego-Stengel, D. E. Shulz, S. Haidarliu, R. Sosnik, and E. Ahissar
Acetylcholine-Dependent Induction and Expression of Functional Plasticity in the Barrel Cortex of the Adult Rat
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2001; 86(1): 422 - 437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online