The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 80 No. 3 September 1998, pp. 1070-1081
Copyright ©1998 The American Physiological Society

Contrast Enhancement and Distributed Encoding by Bipolar Cells in the Retina

Dwight A. Burkhardt and Patrick K. Fahey

Departments of Psychology and Physiology and Graduate Program of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455

Burkhardt, Dwight A. and Patrick K. Fahey. Contrast enhancement and distributed encoding by bipolar cells in the retina. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 1070-1081, 1998. Responses of bipolar cells, cone photoreceptors, and horizontal cells were recorded intracellularly in superfused eyecup preparations of the tiger salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum). Contrast flashes of positive and negative polarity were applied at the center of the receptive field while the entire retina was light adapted to a background field of 20 cd/m². For small contrasts, many bipolar cells showed remarkably high contrast gain: up to 15-20% of the bipolar response was evoked by a contrast step of 1%. There was considerable variation from cell to cell but, on average, no striking differences in contrast gain were found between the depolarizing (Bd) and hyperpolarizing (Bh) bipolar cells. Quantitative comparisons of contrast/response measurements for cone photoreceptors and cone-driven bipolars suggest that the high contrast gain of bipolars is the consequence of a 5-10 × amplification of small signals across the cone  bipolar synapse. Bipolar cells had a very restricted linear range of response and tended to saturate at stimulus levels that were within the linear range of the cone response. The contrast/response of horizontal cells was similar to that of cones and differed markedly from that of Bh cells. For steps of equal contrast, the latency of the Bh cells was ~20 ms shorter than that of the Bd cells regardless of the contrast magnitude. For both bipolar cells and cones, the effect of contrast polarity on latency seems largely due to the absolute value of the light step, L. In the large signal domain, properties of the contrast responses of bipolar cells varied appreciably, both within and between the Bd and Bh classes. Cells of either class could be positive- or negative-contrast dominant. These and additional results show that in the light-adapted retina, the bipolar population is functionally diverse and has the potential to provide a rich substrate for distributed encoding of visual images.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. D. Victor, E. M. Blessing, J. D. Forte, P. Buzas, and P. R. Martin Response variability of marmoset parvocellular neurons J. Physiol., February 15, 2007; 579(1): 29 - 51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Segev, J. Puchalla, and M. J. Berry II Functional Organization of Ganglion Cells in the Salamander Retina J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2006; 95(4): 2277 - 2292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Rieke Temporal Contrast Adaptation in Salamander Bipolar Cells J. Neurosci., December 1, 2001; 21(23): 9445 - 9454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. B. Demb, K. Zaghloul, L. Haarsma, and P. Sterling Bipolar Cells Contribute to Nonlinear Spatial Summation in the Brisk-Transient (Y) Ganglion Cell in Mammalian Retina J. Neurosci., October 1, 2001; 21(19): 7447 - 7454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. R. Alexander, G. A. Fishman, C. S. Barnes, and S. Grover ON-Response Deficit in the Electroretinogram of the Cone System in X-Linked Retinoschisis Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2001; 42(2): 453 - 459. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				D. A. Burkhardt and P. K. Fahey Contrast Rectification and Distributed Encoding By ON-OFF Amacrine Cells in the Retina J Neurophysiol, October 1, 1999; 82(4): 1676 - 1688. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]