|
|
||||||||
The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 80 No. 3 September 1998,
pp. 1211-1221
Copyright ©1998 The American Physiological Society
1 Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1; and 2 Centre de Recherche en Gérontologie et Gériatrie, University de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec J1C 4C4, Canada
Winter, David A., Aftab E. Patla, Francois Prince, Milad Ishac, and Krystyna Gielo-Perczak. Stiffness control of balance in quiet standing. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 1211-1221, 1998. Our goal was to provide some insights into how the CNS controls and maintains an upright standing posture, which is an integral part of activities of daily living. Although researchers have used simple performance measures of maintenance of this posture quite effectively in clinical decision making, the mechanisms and control principles involved have not been clear. We propose a relatively simple control scheme for regulation of upright posture that provides almost instantaneous corrective response and reduces the operating demands on the CNS. The analytic model is derived and experimentally validated. A stiffness model was developed for quiet standing. The model assumes that muscles act as springs to cause the center-of-pressure (COP) to move in phase with the center-of-mass (COM) as the body sways about some desired position. In the sagittal plane this stiffness control exists at the ankle plantarflexors, in the frontal plane by the hip abductors/adductors. On the basis of observations that the COP-COM error signal continuously oscillates, it is evident that the inverted pendulum model is severely underdamped, approaching the undamped condition. The spectrum of this error signal is seen to match that of a tuned mass, spring, damper system, and a curve fit of this "tuned circuit" yields
n the undamped natural frequency of the system. The effective stiffness of the system, Ke, is then estimated from Ke = I
2n, and the damping B is estimated from B = BW × I, where BW is the bandwidth of the tuned response (in rad/s), and I is the moment of inertia of the body about the ankle joint. Ten adult subjects were assessed while standing quietly at three stance widths: 50% hip-to-hip distance, 100 and 150%. Subjects stood for 2 min in each position with eyes open; the 100% stance width was repeated with eyes closed. In all trials and in both planes, the COP oscillated virtually in phase (within 6 ms) with COM, which was predicted by a simple 0th order spring model. Sway amplitude decreased as stance width increased, and Ke increased with stance width. A stiffness model would predict sway to vary as K
0.5e. The experimental results were close to this prediction: sway was proportional to K
0.55e. Reactive control of balance was not evident for several reasons. The visual system does not appear to contribute because no significant difference between eyes open and eyes closed results was found at 100% stance width. Vestibular (otolith) and joint proprioceptive reactive control were discounted because the necessary head accelerations, joint displacements, and velocities were well below reported thresholds. Besides, any reactive control would predict that COP would considerably lag (150-250 ms) behind the COM. Because the average COP was only 4 ms delayed behind the COM, reactive control was not evident; this small delay was accounted for by the damping in the tuned mechanical system.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. B. Oude Nijhuis, B. R. Bloem, M. G. Carpenter, and J. H. J. Allum Incorporating Voluntary Knee Flexion Into Nonanticipatory Balance Corrections J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2007; 98(5): 3047 - 3059. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. D. Loram, C. N. Maganaris, and M. Lakie The passive, human calf muscles in relation to standing: the non-linear decrease from short range to long range stiffness J. Physiol., October 15, 2007; 584(2): 661 - 675. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Lee, T. Lee, D. Dexter, R. Klein, and A. Park Methodological Infrastructure in Surgical Ergonomics: A Review of Tasks, Models, and Measurement Systems Surgical Innovation, September 1, 2007; 14(3): 153 - 167. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Belavy, C. A. Richardson, S. J. Wilson, D. Felsenberg, and J. Rittweger Tonic-to-phasic shift of lumbo-pelvic muscle activity during 8 weeks of bed rest and 6-months follow up J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2007; 103(1): 48 - 54. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Johannsen, A. M. Wing, and V. Hatzitaki Effects of Maintaining Touch Contact on Predictive and Reactive Balance J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 2686 - 2695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.-L. Hsu, J. P. Scholz, G. Schoner, J. J. Jeka, and T. Kiemel Control and Estimation of Posture During Quiet Stance Depends on Multijoint Coordination J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 3024 - 3035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. D. Loram, P. J. Gawthrop, and M. Lakie The frequency of human, manual adjustments in balancing an inverted pendulum is constrained by intrinsic physiological factors J. Physiol., November 15, 2006; 577(1): 417 - 432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. V. Sullivan, J. Rose, and A. Pfefferbaum Effect of Vision, Touch and Stance on Cerebellar Vermian-related Sway and Tremor: A Quantitative Physiological and MRI Study Cereb Cortex, August 1, 2006; 16(8): 1077 - 1086. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Cenciarini and R. J. Peterka Stimulus-Dependent Changes in the Vestibular Contribution to Human Postural Control J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2006; 95(5): 2733 - 2750. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Mochizuki, T. D. Ivanova, and S. J. Garland Synchronization of Motor Units in Human Soleus Muscle During Standing Postural Tasks J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2005; 94(1): 62 - 69. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Krishnamoorthy and M. L. Latash Reversals of anticipatory postural adjustments during voluntary sway in humans J. Physiol., June 1, 2005; 565(2): 675 - 684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L Whitney, R. G Jacob, P. J Sparto, E. F Olshansky, G. Detweiler-Shostak, E. L Brown, and J. M Furman Acrophobia and Pathological Height Vertigo: Indications for Vestibular Physical Therapy? Physical Therapy, May 1, 2005; 85(5): 443 - 458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. D Loram, C. N Maganaris, and M. Lakie Human postural sway results from frequent, ballistic bias impulses by soleus and gastrocnemius J. Physiol., April 1, 2005; 564(1): 295 - 311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. D Loram, C. N Maganaris, and M. Lakie Active, non-spring-like muscle movements in human postural sway: how might paradoxical changes in muscle length be produced? J. Physiol., April 1, 2005; 564(1): 281 - 293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Pavol Detecting and Understanding Differences in Postural Sway. Focus on "A New Interpretation of Spontaneous Sway Measures Based on a Simple Model of Human Postural Control" J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2005; 93(1): 20 - 21. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Carpenter, J. S. Frank, A. L. Adkin, A. Paton, and J.H.J. Allum Influence of Postural Anxiety on Postural Reactions to Multi-Directional Surface Rotations J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2004; 92(6): 3255 - 3265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Jeka, T. Kiemel, R. Creath, F. Horak, and R. Peterka Controlling Human Upright Posture: Velocity Information Is More Accurate Than Position or Acceleration J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2004; 92(4): 2368 - 2379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. T. Moritz and C. T. Farley Passive dynamics change leg mechanics for an unexpected surface during human hopping J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2004; 97(4): 1313 - 1322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. D. Loram, C. N. Maganaris, and M. Lakie Paradoxical muscle movement in human standing J. Physiol., May 1, 2004; 556(3): 683 - 689. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Masani, M. R. Popovic, K. Nakazawa, M. Kouzaki, and D. Nozaki Importance of Body Sway Velocity Information in Controlling Ankle Extensor Activities During Quiet Stance J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2003; 90(6): 3774 - 3782. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. G. Morasso and V. Sanguineti Ankle Muscle Stiffness Alone Cannot Stabilize Balance During Quiet Standing J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2002; 88(4): 2157 - 2162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Peterka Sensorimotor Integration in Human Postural Control J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2002; 88(3): 1097 - 1118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Gill, J. H. J. Allum, M. G. Carpenter, M. Held-Ziolkowska, A. L. Adkin, F. Honegger, and K. Pierchala Trunk Sway Measures of Postural Stability During Clinical Balance Tests: Effects of Age J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., July 1, 2001; 56(7): M438 - 447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Winter, A. E. Patla, S. Rietdyk, and M. G. Ishac Ankle Muscle Stiffness in the Control of Balance During Quiet Standing J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2001; 85(6): 2630 - 2633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Henry, J. Fung, and F. B. Horak Effect of Stance Width on Multidirectional Postural Responses J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2001; 85(2): 559 - 570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. G. Morasso and M. Schieppati Can Muscle Stiffness Alone Stabilize Upright Standing? J Neurophysiol, September 1, 1999; 82(3): 1622 - 1626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. D. Loram and M. Lakie Human balancing of an inverted pendulum: position control by small, ballistic-like, throw and catch movements J. Physiol., May 1, 2002; 540(3): 1111 - 1124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |