The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 80 No. 4 October 1998, pp. 1787-1799
Copyright ©1998 The American Physiological Society

Intermittency in Preplanned Elbow Movements Persists in the Absence of Visual Feedback

Joseph A. Doeringer¹ and Neville Hogan^{1, 2}

Departments of ¹ Mechanical Engineering and ² Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139

Doeringer, Joseph A. and Neville Hogan. Intermittency in preplanned elbow movements persists in the absence of visual feedback. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 1787-1799, 1998. It has been observed for nearly 100 years that visually guided human movements appear to be composed of submovements, intermittently executed overlapping segments. This paper presents experiments to investigate the pervasiveness of movement intermittency and, in particular, whether it is exclusively due to visual feedback. With and without visual feedback, human subjects were asked to 1) move with constant velocity and 2) draw elliptical figures on a phase-plane display (showing velocity vs. position) that required cyclic movements at different frequencies. In both tasks, we found that removal of visual feedback did not significantly change movement intermittency. Subjects were unable to generate movements at constant speed. In addition, subjects moved less smoothly when drawing slower phase-plane ellipses. Furthermore, elliptical phase-plane figures were not always drawn at the frequency suggested by the center of the display. Instead, subjects moved more slowly than the tall (fast) ellipse displays suggested, and faster than the wide (slow) displays suggested. These results show that 1) movement intermittency is not exclusively due to visual feedback and 2) may in fact be a fundamental feature of movement behavior.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. J. Kargo and S. F. Giszter Individual Premotor Drive Pulses, Not Time-Varying Synergies, Are the Units of Adjustment for Limb Trajectories Constructed in Spinal Cord J. Neurosci., March 5, 2008; 28(10): 2409 - 2425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Lakie and I. D. Loram Manually controlled human balancing using visual, vestibular and proprioceptive senses involves a common, low frequency neural process J. Physiol., November 15, 2006; 577(1): 403 - 416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. D. Loram, P. J. Gawthrop, and M. Lakie The frequency of human, manual adjustments in balancing an inverted pendulum is constrained by intrinsic physiological factors J. Physiol., November 15, 2006; 577(1): 417 - 432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Kistemaker, A. J. Van Soest, and M. F. Bobbert Is Equilibrium Point Control Feasible for Fast Goal-Directed Single-Joint Movements? J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2006; 95(5): 2898 - 2912. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. J. Lang, I. Sugihara, and R. Llinas Olivocerebellar modulation of motor cortex ability to generate vibrissal movements in rat J. Physiol., February 15, 2006; 571(1): 101 - 120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. B. Hart and S. F. Giszter Modular Premotor Drives and Unit Bursts as Primitives for Frog Motor Behaviors J. Neurosci., June 2, 2004; 24(22): 5269 - 5282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. B. Slifkin, D. E. Vaillancourt, and K. M. Newell Intermittency in the Control of Continuous Force Production J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2000; 84(4): 1708 - 1718. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. J. Kargo and S. F. Giszter Rapid Correction of Aimed Movements by Summation of Force-Field Primitives J. Neurosci., January 1, 2000; 20(1): 409 - 426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]