JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 80: 2133-2150, 1998;
0022-3077/98 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eggermont, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Mossop, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eggermont, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Mossop, J. E.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 80 No. 4 October 1998, pp. 2133-2150
Copyright ©1998 The American Physiological Society

Azimuth Coding in Primary Auditory Cortex of the Cat. I. Spike Synchrony Versus Spike Count Representations

Jos J. Eggermont and Jennifer E. Mossop

Departments of Physiology and Biophysics, and Psychology, The University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada

Eggermont, Jos J. and Jennifer E. Mossop. Azimuth coding in primary auditory cortex of the cat. I. Spike synchrony versus spike count representations. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 2133-2150, 1998. The neural representation of sound azimuth in auditory cortex most often is considered to be average firing rate, and azimuth tuning curves based thereupon appear to be rather broad. Coincident firings of simultaneously recorded neurons could provide an improved representation of sound azimuth compared with that contained in the firing rate in either of the units. In the present study, a comparison was made between local field potentials and several measures based on unit firing rate and coincident firing with respect to their azimuth-tuning curve bandwidth. Noise bursts, covering a 60-dB intensity range, were presented from nine speakers arranged in a semicircular array with a radius of 55 cm in the animal's frontal half field. At threshold intensities, all local field potential (LFP) recordings showed preferences for contralateral azimuths. Multiunit recordings showed in 74% a threshold for contralateral azimuths, in 16% for frontal azimuths, and in only 5% showed an ipsilateral threshold. The remaining 5% were not spatially tuned. Representations for directionally sensitive units based on coincident firings provided significantly sharper tuning (50-60° bandwidth at 25 dB above the lowest threshold) than those based on firing rate (bandwidths of 80-90°). The ability to predict sound azimuth from the directional information contained in the neural population activity was simulated by combining the responses of the 102 single units. Peak firing rates and coincident firings with LFPs at the preferred azimuth for each unit were used to construct a population vector. At stimulus levels of >= 40 dB SPL, the prediction function was sigmoidal with the predicted frontal azimuth coinciding with the frontal speaker position. Sound azimuths >45° from the midline all resulted in predicted values of -90 or 90°, respectively. No differences were observed in the performance of the prediction based on firing rate or coincident firings for these intensities. This suggests that although coincident firings produce narrower azimuth tuning curves, the information contained in the overall neural population does not increase compared with that contained in a firing rate representation. The relatively poor performance of the population vector further suggests that primary auditory cortex does not code sound azimuth by a globally distributed measure of peak firing rate or coincident firing.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
U. Werner-Reiss and J. M. Groh
A Rate Code for Sound Azimuth in Monkey Auditory Cortex: Implications for Human Neuroimaging Studies
J. Neurosci., April 2, 2008; 28(14): 3747 - 3758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
I. Asher, E. Stark, M. Abeles, and Y. Prut
Comparison of Direction and Object Selectivity of Local Field Potentials and Single Units in Macaque Posterior Parietal Cortex During Prehension
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2007; 97(5): 3684 - 3695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
Y. Kajikawa, L. de La Mothe, S. Blumell, and T. A. Hackett
A Comparison of Neuron Response Properties in Areas A1 and CM of the Marmoset Monkey Auditory Cortex: Tones and Broadband Noise
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2005; 93(1): 22 - 34.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. A. Reale, R. L. Jenison, and J. F. Brugge
Directional Sensitivity of Neurons in the Primary Auditory (AI) Cortex: Effects of Sound-Source Intensity Level
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2003; 89(2): 1024 - 1038.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. A. Razak and Z. M. Fuzessery
Functional Organization of the Pallid Bat Auditory Cortex: Emphasis on Binaural Organization
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2002; 87(1): 72 - 86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
D.H. Reser, Y.I. Fishman, J.C. Arezzo, and M. Steinschneider
Binaural Interactions in Primary Auditory Cortex of the Awake Macaque
Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2000; 10(6): 574 - 584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. J. Eggermont
Azimuth Coding in Primary Auditory Cortex of the Cat. II. Relative Latency and Interspike Interval Representation
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 1998; 80(4): 2151 - 2161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online