JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Neurophysiol 80: 2206-2209, 1998;
0022-3077/98 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tate, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Malpeli, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tate, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Malpeli, J. G.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 80 No. 4 October 1998, pp. 2206-2209
Copyright ©1998 The American Physiological Society

RAPID COMMUNICATION


Effects of Focal Inactivation of Dorsal or Ventral Layers of the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus on Cats' Ability to See and Fixate Small Targets

Andrew K. Tate1, 2 and Joseph G. Malpeli2

1 Neuroscience Program and 2 Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, Champaign, Illinois 61820

Tate, Andrew K. and Joseph G. Malpeli. Effects of focal inactivation of dorsal or ventral layers of the lateral geniculate nucleus on cats' ability to see and fixate small targets. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 2206-2209, 1998. To reveal contributions of different subdivisions of the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) to visuomotor behavior, segments of either layer A or the C layers were inactivated with microinjections of gamma -aminobutyric acid while cats made saccades to retinally stabilized spots of light placed either in affected regions of visual space or mirror-symmetric locations in the opposite hemifield. Inactivating layer A reduced the success rate for saccades to targets presented in affected locations from 82.4 to 26.8% while having no effect on saccades to the control hemifield. Saccades to affected sites had reduced accuracy and longer initiation latency and tended to be hypometric. In contrast, inactivating C layers did not affect performance. Data from all conditions fell along the same saccade velocity/amplitude function ("main sequence"), suggesting that LGN inactivations cause localization deficits, but do not interfere with saccade dynamics. Cerebral cortex is the only target of the A layers, so behavioral decrements caused by inactivating layer A must be related to changes in cortical activity. Inactivating layer A substantially reduces the activity of large subsets of corticotectal cells in areas 17 and 18, whereas few corticotectal cells depend on C layers for visually driven activity. The parallels between these behavioral and electrophysiological data along with the central role of the superior colliculus in saccadic eye movements suggests that the corticotectal pathway is involved in both deficits and remaining capacities resulting from blockade of layer A.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online