JN Watch the video to see how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 80: 2446-2466, 1998;
0022-3077/98 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lamotte, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Srinivasan, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lamotte, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Srinivasan, M. A.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 80 No. 5 November 1998, pp. 2446-2466
Copyright ©1998 The American Physiological Society

Raised Object on a Planar Surface Stroked Across the Fingerpad: Responses of Cutaneous Mechanoreceptors to Shape and Orientation

R. H. Lamotte1, R. M. Friedman1, C. Lu1, P. S. Khalsa1, and M. A. Srinivasan2

1 Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510; and 2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139

LaMotte, R. H., R. M. Friedman, C. Lu, P. S. Khalsa, and M. A. Srinivasan. Raised object on a planar surface stroked across the fingerpad: responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors to shape and orientation. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 2446-2466, 1998. The representations of orientation and shape were studied in the responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors to an isolated, raised object on a planar surface stroked across the fingerpad. The objects were the top portions of a sphere with a 5-mm radius, and two toroids each with a radius of 5 mm along one axis and differing radii of 1 or 3 mm along the orthogonal axis. The velocity and direction of stroking were fixed while the orientation of the object in the horizontal plane was varied. Each object was stroked along a series of laterally shifted, parallel, linear trajectories over the receptive fields of slowly adapting, type I (SA), and rapidly adapting, type I (RA) mechanoreceptive afferents innervating the fingerpad of the monkey. "Spatial event plots" (SEPs) of the occurrence of action potentials, as a function of the location of each object on the receptive field, were interpreted as the responses of a spatially distributed population of fibers. That portion of the plot evoked by the curved object (the SEPc) provided a representation of the shape and orientation of the two-dimensional outline of the object in the horizontal plane in contact with the skin. For both SAs and RAs, the major vector of the SEPc, obtained by a principal components analysis, was linearly related to the physical orientation of the major axis of each toroid. The spatial distribution of discharge rates [spatial rate surface profiles (SRSs), after plotting mean instantaneous frequency versus spatial locus within the SEPc] represented object shape in a third dimension, normal to the skin surface. The shape of the SA SRSs, well fitted by Gaussian equations, better represented object shape than that of the RA SRSs. A cross-sectional profile along the minor axis [spatial rate profile (SRP)] was approximately triangular for SAs. After normalization for differences in peak height, the falling slopes of the SA SRPs increased, and the base widths decreased with curvature of the object's minor axis. These curvature-related differences in slopes and widths were invariant with changes in object orientation. It is hypothesized that circularity in object shape is coded by the constancy of slopes of SA SRPs between peak and base and that the constancy of differences in the widths and falling slopes evoked by different raised objects encodes, respectively, the differences in their sizes and shapes regardless of differences in their orientation on the skin.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. P. Gardner, K. S. Babu, S. Ghosh, A. Sherwood, and J. Chen
Neurophysiology of Prehension. III. Representation of Object Features in Posterior Parietal Cortex of the Macaque Monkey
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3708 - 3730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. C. Leiser and K. A. Moxon
Relationship Between Physiological Response Type (RA and SA) and Vibrissal Receptive Field of Neurons Within the Rat Trigeminal Ganglion
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2006; 95(5): 3129 - 3145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
R. M. Friedman, P. S. Khalsa, K. W. Greenquist, and R. H. LaMotte
Neural Coding of the Location and Direction of a Moving Object by a Spatially Distributed Population of Mechanoreceptors
J. Neurosci., November 1, 2002; 22(21): 9556 - 9566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
P A McNulty and V G Macefield
Modulation of ongoing EMG by different classes of low-threshold mechanoreceptors in the human hand
J. Physiol., December 15, 2001; 537(3): 1021 - 1032.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
H. E. Wheat and A. W. Goodwin
Tactile Discrimination of Edge Shape: Limits on Spatial Resolution Imposed by Parameters of the Peripheral Neural Population
J. Neurosci., October 1, 2001; 21(19): 7751 - 7763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. Jenmalm, S. Dahlstedt, and R. S. Johansson
Visual and Tactile Information About Object-Curvature Control Fingertip Forces and Grasp Kinematics in Human Dexterous Manipulation
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2000; 84(6): 2984 - 2997.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. W. Bisley, A. W. Goodwin, and H. E. Wheat
Slowly Adapting Type I Afferents From the Sides and End of the Finger Respond to Stimuli on the Center of the Fingerpad
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2000; 84(1): 57 - 64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online