The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 80 No. 5 November 1998, pp. 2645-2656
Copyright ©1998 The American Physiological Society

Modeling of Auditory Spatial Receptive Fields With Spherical Approximation Functions

Rick L. Jenison^{1, 2}, Richard A. Reale^{2, 3}, Joseph E. Hind^{2, 3}, and John F. Brugge^{2, 3}

¹ Department of Psychology, ² Department of Physiology, and the ³ Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706

Jenison, Rick L., Richard A. Reale, Joseph E. Hind, and John F. Brugge. Modeling of auditory spatial receptive fields with spherical approximation functions. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 2645-2656, 1998. A spherical approximation technique is presented that affords a mathematical characterization of a virtual space receptive field (VSRF) based on first-spike latency in the auditory cortex of cat. Parameterizing directional sensitivity in this fashion is much akin to the use of difference-of-Gaussian (DOG) functions for modeling neural responses in visual cortex. Artificial neural networks and approximation techniques typically have been applied to problems conforming to a multidimensional Cartesian input space. The problem with using classical planar Gaussians is that radial symmetry and consistency on the plane actually translate into directionally dependent distortion on spherical surfaces. An alternative set of spherical basis functions, the von Mises basis function (VMBF), is used to eliminate spherical approximation distortion. Unlike the Fourier transform or spherical harmonic expansions, the VMBFs are nonorthogonal, and hence require some form of gradient-descent search for optimal estimation of parameters in the modeling of the VSRF. The optimization equations required to solve this problem are presented. Three descriptive classes of VSRF (contralateral, frontal, and ipsilateral) approximations are investigated, together with an examination of the residual error after parameter optimization. The use of the analytic receptive field model in computational models of population coding of sound direction is discussed, together with the importance of quantifying receptive field gradients. Because spatial hearing is by its very nature three dimensional or, more precisely, two dimensional (directional) on the sphere, we find that spatial receptive field models are best developed on the sphere.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. M. Woods, S. E. Lopez, J. H. Long, J. E. Rahman, and G. H. Recanzone Effects of Stimulus Azimuth and Intensity on the Single-Neuron Activity in the Auditory Cortex of the Alert Macaque Monkey J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 3323 - 3337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. L. Jenison and R. A. Reale The Shape of Neural Dependence Neural Comput., April 1, 2004; 16(4): 665 - 672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. J. Akerman, M. S. Grubb, and I. D. Thompson Spatial and Temporal Properties of Visual Responses in the Thalamus of the Developing Ferret J. Neurosci., January 7, 2004; 24(1): 170 - 182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Reale, R. L. Jenison, and J. F. Brugge Directional Sensitivity of Neurons in the Primary Auditory (AI) Cortex: Effects of Sound-Source Intensity Level J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2003; 89(2): 1024 - 1038. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. L. Jenison, J. W. H. Schnupp, R. A. Reale, and J. F. Brugge Auditory Space-Time Receptive Field Dynamics Revealed by Spherical White-Noise Analysis J. Neurosci., June 15, 2001; 21(12): 4408 - 4415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Reale and J. F. Brugge Directional Sensitivity of Neurons in the Primary Auditory (AI) Cortex of the Cat to Successive Sounds Ordered in Time and Space J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2000; 84(1): 435 - 450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]