The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 80 No. 6 December 1998, pp. 2811-2823
Copyright ©1998 The American Physiological Society

Temporal and Spatial Response to Second-Order Stimuli in Cat Area 18 

Isabelle Mareschal and Curtis L. Baker Jr.

McGill Vision Research Unit, Department of Ophthalmology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1A1, Canada

Mareschal, Isabelle and Curtis L. Baker, Jr. Temporal and spatial response to second-order stimuli in cat area 18. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 2811-2823, 1998. Approximately one-half of the neurons in cat area 18 respond to contrast envelope stimuli, consisting of a sinewave carrier whose contrast is modulated by a drifting sinewave envelope of lower spatial frequency. These stimuli should fail to elicit a response from a conventional linear neuron because they are designed to contain no spatial frequency components within the cell's luminance-defined frequency passband. We measured neurons' responses to envelope stimuli by varying both the drift rate and spatial frequency of the contrast modulation. These data were then compared with the same neurons' spatial and temporal properties obtained with luminance-defined sinewave gratings. Most neurons' responses to the envelope stimuli were spatially and temporally bandpass, with bandwidths comparable with those measured with luminance gratings. The temporal responses of these neurons (temporal frequency tuning and latency) were systematically slower when tested with envelope stimuli than with luminance gratings. The simplest kind of model that can accommodate these results is one having separate, parallel streams of bandpass processing for luminance and envelope stimuli.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Hayashi, K. Miura, H. Tabata, and K. Kawano Eye Movements in Response to Dichoptic Motion: Evidence for a Parallel-Hierarchical Structure of Visual Motion Processing in Primates J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2329 - 2346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A. Zhan and C. L. Baker Jr Critical Spatial Frequencies for Illusory Contour Processing in Early Visual Cortex Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2008; 18(5): 1029 - 1041. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Ashida, A. Lingnau, M. B. Wall, and A. T. Smith fMRI Adaptation Reveals Separate Mechanisms for First-Order and Second-Order Motion J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 1319 - 1325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Tanaka and I. Ohzawa Neural basis for stereopsis from second-order contrast cues. J. Neurosci., April 19, 2006; 26(16): 4370 - 4382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Larsson, M. S. Landy, and D. J. Heeger Orientation-Selective Adaptation to First- and Second-Order Patterns in Human Visual Cortex J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2006; 95(2): 862 - 881. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.'y. Nishida, Y. Sasaki, I. Murakami, T. Watanabe, and R. B. H. Tootell Neuroimaging of Direction-Selective Mechanisms for Second-Order Motion J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2003; 90(5): 3242 - 3254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Bourne, R. Tweedale, and M. G.P. Rosa Physiological Responses of New World Monkey V1 Neurons to Stimuli Defined by Coherent Motion Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2002; 12(11): 1132 - 1145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. S. Masson and E. Castet Parallel Motion Processing for the Initiation of Short-Latency Ocular Following in Humans J. Neurosci., June 15, 2002; 22(12): 5149 - 5163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]