| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 81 No. 1 January 1999,
pp. 267-276
Copyright ©1999 The American Physiological Society
1 Department of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E9; and 2 Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada
Wylie, Douglas R. W. and Barrie J. Frost. Responses of Neurons in the nucleus of the basal optic root to translational and rotational flowfields. J. Neurophysiol. 81: 267-276, 1999. The nucleus of the basal optic root (nBOR) receives direct input from the contralateral retina and is the first step in a pathway dedicated to the analysis of optic flowfields resulting from self-motion. Previous studies have shown that most nBOR neurons exhibit direction selectivity in response to large-field stimuli moving in the contralateral hemifield, but a subpopulation of nBOR neurons has binocular receptive fields. In this study, the activity of binocular nBOR neurons was recorded in anesthetized pigeons in response to panoramic translational and rotational optic flow. Translational optic flow was produced by the "translator" projector described in the companion paper, and rotational optic flow was produced by a "planetarium projector" described by Wylie and Frost. The axis of rotation or translation could be positioned to any orientation in three-dimensional space. We recorded from 37 cells, most of which exhibited a strong contralateral dominance. Most of these cells were located in the caudal and dorsal aspects of the nBOR complex and many were localized to the subnucleus nBOR dorsalis. Other units were located outside the boundaries of the nBOR complex in the adjacent area ventralis of Tsai or mesencephalic reticular formation. Six cells responded best to rotational flowfields, whereas 31 responded best to translational flowfields. Of the rotation cells, three preferred rotation about the vertical axis and three preferred horizontal axes. Of the translation cells, 3 responded best to a flowfield simulating downward translation of the bird along a vertical axis, whereas the remaining 28 responded best to flowfields resulting from translation along axes in the horizontal plane. Seventeen of these cells preferred a flowfield resulting from the animal translating backward along an axis oriented ~45° to the midline, but the best axes of the remaining eleven cells were distributed throughout the horizontal plane with no definitive clustering. These data are compared with the responses of vestibulocerebellar Purkinje cells.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  P. Liang, R. Kern, and M. Egelhaaf Motion Adaptation Enhances Object-Induced Neural Activity in Three-Dimensional Virtual Environment J. Neurosci., October 29, 2008; 28(44): 11328 - 11332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 O. A. Masseck and K.-P. Hoffmann Responses to Moving Visual Stimuli in Pretectal Neurons of the Small-Spotted Dogfish (Scyliorhinus canicula) J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2008; 99(1): 200 - 207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Maurice, H. Gioanni, and A. Abourachid Influence of the behavioural context on the optocollic reflex (OCR) in pigeons (Columba livia) J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2006; 209(2): 292 - 301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Karmeier, H. G. Krapp, and M. Egelhaaf Population Coding of Self-Motion: Applying Bayesian Analysis to a Population of Visual Interneurons in the Fly J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2005; 94(3): 2182 - 2194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. R. Winship, P. L. Hurd, and D. R. W. Wylie Spatiotemporal Tuning of Optic Flow Inputs to the Vestibulocerebellum in Pigeons: Differences Between Mossy and Climbing Fiber Pathways J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2005; 93(3): 1266 - 1277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Karmeier, H. G. Krapp, and M. Egelhaaf Robustness of the Tuning of Fly Visual Interneurons to Rotatory Optic Flow J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2003; 90(3): 1626 - 1634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. A. Crowder, M. R.W. Dawson, and D. R.W. Wylie Temporal Frequency and Velocity-Like Tuning in the Pigeon Accessory Optic System J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2003; 90(3): 1829 - 1841. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Ariel and N. Kogo Direction Tuning of Inhibitory Inputs to the Turtle Accessory Optic System J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2001; 86(6): 2919 - 2930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Haag and A. Borst Recurrent Network Interactions Underlying Flow-Field Selectivity of Visual Interneurons J. Neurosci., August 1, 2001; 21(15): 5685 - 5692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. G. Krapp, R. Hengstenberg, and M. Egelhaaf Binocular Contributions to Optic Flow Processing in the Fly Visual System J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2001; 85(2): 724 - 734. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. R. W. Wylie, R. G. Glover, and J. D. Aitchison Optic Flow Input to the Hippocampal Formation from the Accessory Optic System J. Neurosci., July 1, 1999; 19(13): 5514 - 5527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. R. W. Wylie and B. J. Frost Complex Spike Activity of Purkinje Cells in the Ventral Uvula and Nodulus of Pigeons in Response to Translational Optic Flow J Neurophysiol, January 1, 1999; 81(1): 256 - 266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |
