JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 81: 1355-1364, 1999;
0022-3077/99 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Beers, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Gon, J. J. D. v. d.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Beers, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Gon, J. J. D. v. d.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 81 No. 3 March 1999, pp. 1355-1364
Copyright ©1999 by the American Physiological Society

Integration of Proprioceptive and Visual Position-Information: An Experimentally Supported Model

Robert J. van Beers, Anne C. Sittig, and Jan J. Denier van der Gon

Faculty of Design, Engineering and Production, Delft University of Technology, NL-2628 BX Delft, The Netherlands

van Beers, Robert J., Anne C. Sittig, and Jan J. Denier van der Gon. Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information: an experimentally supported model. To localize one's hand, i.e., to find out its position with respect to the body, humans may use proprioceptive information or visual information or both. It is still not known how the CNS combines simultaneous proprioceptive and visual information. In this study, we investigate in what position in a horizontal plane a hand is localized on the basis of simultaneous proprioceptive and visual information and compare this to the positions in which it is localized on the basis of proprioception only and vision only. Seated at a table, subjects matched target positions on the table top with their unseen left hand under the table. The experiment consisted of three series. In each of these series, the target positions were presented in three conditions: by vision only, by proprioception only, or by both vision and proprioception. In one of the three series, the visual information was veridical. In the other two, it was modified by prisms that displaced the visual field to the left and to the right, respectively. The results show that the mean of the positions indicated in the condition with both vision and proprioception generally lies off the straight line through the means of the other two conditions. In most cases the mean lies on the side predicted by a model describing the integration of multisensory information. According to this model, the visual information and the proprioceptive information are weighted with direction-dependent weights, the weights being related to the direction-dependent precision of the information in such a way that the available information is used very efficiently. Because the proposed model also can explain the unexpectedly small sizes of the variable errors in the localization of a seen hand that were reported earlier, there is strong evidence to support this model. The results imply that the CNS has knowledge about the direction-dependent precision of the proprioceptive and visual information.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
N. Gosselin-Kessiby, J. Messier, and J. F. Kalaska
Evidence for Automatic On-Line Adjustments of Hand Orientation During Natural Reaching Movements to Stationary Targets
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2008; 99(4): 1653 - 1671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. Liu and E. Todorov
Evidence for the Flexible Sensorimotor Strategies Predicted by Optimal Feedback Control
J. Neurosci., August 29, 2007; 27(35): 9354 - 9368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. J. Schlicht and P. R. Schrater
Impact of Coordinate Transformation Uncertainty on Human Sensorimotor Control
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2007; 97(6): 4203 - 4214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. A. Scheidt and T. Stoeckmann
Reach Adaptation and Final Position Control Amid Environmental Uncertainty After Stroke
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 2824 - 2836.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
P. M. Bays and D. M. Wolpert
Computational principles of sensorimotor control that minimize uncertainty and variability
J. Physiol., January 15, 2007; 578(2): 387 - 396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
S. Deneve
Bayesian Spiking Neurons I: Inference
Neural Comput., January 1, 2007; 20(1): 91 - 117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. B. J. Smeets, J. J. van den Dobbelsteen, D. D. J. de Grave, R. J. van Beers, and E. Brenner
Sensory integration does not lead to sensory calibration
PNAS, December 5, 2006; 103(49): 18781 - 18786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. Ren, A. Z. Khan, G. Blohm, D.Y.P. Henriques, L. E. Sergio, and J. D. Crawford
Proprioceptive Guidance of Saccades in Eye-Hand Coordination
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2006; 96(3): 1464 - 1477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Cenciarini and R. J. Peterka
Stimulus-Dependent Changes in the Vestibular Contribution to Human Postural Control
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2006; 95(5): 2733 - 2750.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. Vaziri, J. Diedrichsen, and R. Shadmehr
Why does the brain predict sensory consequences of oculomotor commands? Optimal integration of the predicted and the actual sensory feedback.
J. Neurosci., April 19, 2006; 26(16): 4188 - 4197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. A. Scheidt, M. A. Conditt, E. L. Secco, and F. A. Mussa-Ivaldi
Interaction of Visual and Proprioceptive Feedback During Adaptation of Human Reaching Movements
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2005; 93(6): 3200 - 3213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Learn. Mem.Home page
D. Safstrom and B. B. Edin
Task Requirements Influence Sensory Integration During Grasping in Humans
Learn. Mem., May 1, 2004; 11(3): 356 - 363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. J. van Beers, P. Haggard, and D. M. Wolpert
The Role of Execution Noise in Movement Variability
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2004; 91(2): 1050 - 1063.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. E. Brown, D. A. Rosenbaum, and R. L. Sainburg
Limb Position Drift: Implications for Control of Posture and Movement
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2003; 90(5): 3105 - 3118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. J. Sober and P. N. Sabes
Multisensory Integration during Motor Planning
J. Neurosci., August 6, 2003; 23(18): 6982 - 6992.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
R. J. Baddeley, H. A. Ingram, and R. C. Miall
System Identification Applied to a Visuomotor Task: Near-Optimal Human Performance in a Noisy Changing Task
J. Neurosci., April 1, 2003; 23(7): 3066 - 3075.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online