JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 81: 1506-1512, 1999;
0022-3077/99 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karkanias, N. B.
Right arrow Articles by Papke, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Karkanias, N. B.
Right arrow Articles by Papke, R. L.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 81 No. 4 April 1999, pp. 1506-1512
Copyright ©1999 by the American Physiological Society

Subtype-Specific Effects of Lithium on Glutamate Receptor Function

Nikolas B. Karkanias1 and Roger L. Papke1,2

 1Department of Neuroscience and  2Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Florida Medical College, J. H. Miller Health Center, Gainesville, Florida 32610-0267

Karkanias, Nikolas B. and Roger L. Papke. Subtype-specific effects of lithium on glutamate receptor function. We report that substitution of sodium with lithium (Li+) in the extracellular solution causes subtype-specific changes in the inward and outward currents of glutamate receptors (GluRs), without a shift in reversal potential. Li+ produces an increase of inward and outward currents of alpha -amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionate receptors and decreases in the currents of kainate (KA) and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. The greatest effect of Li+ was observed with GluR3. A concentration-response curve for GluR3 reveals that the potentiation caused by Li+ is greatest at saturating agonist concentrations. GluR1, which shows no potentiation by Li+ at 100 µM KA, shows a small but significant potentiation at saturating KA and glutamate concentrations. The effects of Li+ on outward current, where Li+ is not the primary charge carrier, and the lack of reversal potential shift argue for a mechanism of potentiation not associated with Li+ permeation. This potentiation of current is specific for Li+ because rubidium, although causing an increase of inward current, shifted the reversal potential and did not increase outward current. The effects of Li+ are different for KA, a weak desensitizing agonist, and glutamate, a strong desensitizing agonist, suggesting that Li+ might interact with a mechanism of desensitization. By using cyclothiazide (CTZ) to reduce desensitization of GluR3, we find that for low concentrations of KA and glutamate potentiation of the response by a combination of CTZ and Li+ is no greater than by CTZ or Li+ alone. However, at high concentrations of agonist, the potentiation of the response by a combination of CTZ and Li+ is significantly greater than by CTZ or Li+ alone. This potentiation was additive for glutamate but not for KA. At high agonist concentration in the presence of CTZ, the intrinsically lower desensitization produced with KA-evoked responses may preclude Li+ from potentiating the current to the same degree as it can potentiate glutamate-evoked responses. The additive effects of CTZ and Li+ were unique to the flop variant of GluR3.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. Shalbuyeva, T. Brustovetsky, and N. Brustovetsky
Lithium Desensitizes Brain Mitochondria to Calcium, Antagonizes Permeability Transition, and Diminishes Cytochrome c Release
J. Biol. Chem., June 22, 2007; 282(25): 18057 - 18068.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
N. Chuhma and H. Ohmori
Role of Ca2+ in the Synchronization of Transmitter Release at Calyceal Synapses in the Auditory System of Rat
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2002; 87(1): 222 - 228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online