JN AJP: Cell Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 81: 2103-2118, 1999;
0022-3077/99 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Patil, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hasselmo, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Patil, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hasselmo, M. E.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 81 No. 5 May 1999, pp. 2103-2118
Copyright ©1999 by the American Physiological Society

Modulation of Inhibitory Synaptic Potentials in the Piriform Cortex

Madhvi M. Patil and Michael E. Hasselmo

Department of Psychology, Boston University, Boston 02215; and Department of Psychology and Program in Neuroscience, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138

Patil, Madhvi M. and Michael E. Hasselmo. Modulation of Inhibitory Synaptic Potentials in the Piriform Cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 81: 2103-2118, 1999.Modulation of inhibitory synaptic potentials in the piriform cortex. Intracellular recordings from pyramidal neurons in brain slice preparations of the piriform cortex were used to test results from a computational model about the effects of cholinergic agonists on inhibitory synaptic potentials induced by stimulation of afferent fibers in layer Ia and association/intrinsic fibers in layer Ib. A simple model of piriform cortex as an associative memory was used to analyze how suppression of inhibitory synaptic transmission influenced performance of the network. Levels of suppression of excitatory synaptic transmission were set at levels determined in previous experimental work. Levels of suppression of inhibitory synaptic transmission were then systematically varied within the model. This modeling work demonstrated that suppression of inhibitory synaptic transmission in layer Ib should be stronger than suppression of inhibitory synaptic transmission in layer Ia to keep activity levels high enough for effective storage. Experimental data showed that perfusion of the cholinergic agonist carbachol caused a significant suppression of inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs) in the pyramidal neurons that were induced by stimulation of layer Ib, with a weaker effect on IPSPs induced by stimulation of layer Ia. As previously described, carbachol also selectively suppressed excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) elicited by intrinsic but not afferent fiber stimulation. The decrease in amplitude of IPSPs induced by layer Ib stimulation did not appear to be directly related to the decrease in EPSP amplitude induced by layer Ib stimulation. The stimulation necessary to induce neuronal firing with layer Ia stimulation was reduced in the presence of carbachol, whereas that necessary to induce neuronal firing with layer Ib stimulation was increased, despite the depolarization of resting membrane potential. Thus physiological data on cholinergic modulation of inhibitory synaptic potentials in the piriform cortex is compatible with the functional requirements determined from computational models of piriform cortex associative memory function.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
E. Lucas-Meunier, C. Monier, M. Amar, G. Baux, Y. Fregnac, and P. Fossier
Involvement of Nicotinic and Muscarinic Receptors in the Endogenous Cholinergic Modulation of the Balance between Excitation and Inhibition in the Young Rat Visual Cortex
Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2009; 19(10): 2411 - 2427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. Soto, N. Kopell, and K. Sen
Network Architecture, Receptive Fields, and Neuromodulation: Computational and Functional Implications of Cholinergic Modulation in Primary Auditory Cortex
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 2972 - 2983.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
T. A. Cleland and C. Linster
Computation in the Olfactory System
Chem Senses, November 1, 2005; 30(9): 801 - 813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
N. A. Otmakhova and J. E. Lisman
Contribution of Ih and GABAB to Synaptically Induced Afterhyperpolarizations in CA1: A Brake on the NMDA Response
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2004; 92(4): 2027 - 2039.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
C. Linster and M. E. Hasselmo
Neuromodulation and the Functional Dynamics of Piriform Cortex
Chem Senses, June 1, 2001; 26(5): 585 - 594.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online