|
|
||||||||
The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 81 No. 5 May 1999, pp. 2215-2225
Copyright ©1999 by the American Physiological Society
1Division of Neuroscience,
Collins, D. F.,
B. Knight, and
A. Prochazka.
Contact-Evoked Changes in EMG Activity During Human Grasp. J. Neurophysiol. 81: 2215-2225, 1999.
Contact-evoked changes in EMG activity during human grasp.
2215 Cutaneous receptors in the digits discharge bursts of activity on
contact with an object during human grasp. In this study, we investigated the contribution of this sensory activity to the responses
of muscles involved in the task. Twelve subjects performed a
standardized precision grasp task without the aid of vision. Electromyographic (EMG) responses in trials when the object was present
were compared with those in which the object, and hence the associated
afferent responses, were unexpectedly absent. Significant differences
in EMG amplitude occurred in the interval 50-100 ms after contact in
all subjects and in 33/46 of the muscles sampled. The differences
emerged as early as 34 ms after contact and comprised as much as a
fourfold change in EMG from 50 to 100 ms after contact with the object.
Typically, EMG responses were larger when the object was present (OP),
though there were cases, particularly in the thenar muscles, in which
the responses increased when the object was absent (OA). Local
anesthesia of the thumb and index finger attenuated contact-evoked EMG
activity in at least one muscle in all four subjects tested. In one
subject, contact-evoked responses were abolished completely during the
anesthesia in all four muscles sampled. The results indicate that the
sensory activity signaling contact plays a key role in regulating EMG
activity during human grasp. Much of this feedback action is
attributable to cutaneous receptors in the digits and probably involves
both spinal and supraspinal pathways.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Brochier, R. L. Spinks, M. A. Umilta, and R. N. Lemon Patterns of Muscle Activity Underlying Object-Specific Grasp by the Macaque Monkey J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2004; 92(3): 1770 - 1782. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.-S. Augurelle, A. M. Smith, T. Lejeune, and J.-L. Thonnard Importance of Cutaneous Feedback in Maintaining a Secure Grip During Manipulation of Hand-Held Objects J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2003; 89(2): 665 - 671. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Monzee, Y. Lamarre, and A. M. Smith The Effects of Digital Anesthesia on Force Control Using a Precision Grip J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2003; 89(2): 672 - 683. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Jenmalm, S. Dahlstedt, and R. S. Johansson Visual and Tactile Information About Object-Curvature Control Fingertip Forces and Grasp Kinematics in Human Dexterous Manipulation J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2000; 84(6): 2984 - 2997. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. S. Bradley and C. Sebelski Ankle Restraint Modifies Motility at E12 in Chick Embryos J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2000; 83(1): 431 - 440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |