JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 81: 2215-2225, 1999;
0022-3077/99 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Collins, D. F.
Right arrow Articles by Prochazka, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Collins, D. F.
Right arrow Articles by Prochazka, A.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 81 No. 5 May 1999, pp. 2215-2225
Copyright ©1999 by the American Physiological Society

Contact-Evoked Changes in EMG Activity During Human Grasp

D. F. Collins,1 B. Knight,2 and A. Prochazka1

 1Division of Neuroscience, University of Alberta, Edmonton T6G 2S2; and  2Department of Anesthesiology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2B7, Canada

Collins, D. F., B. Knight, and A. Prochazka. Contact-Evoked Changes in EMG Activity During Human Grasp. J. Neurophysiol. 81: 2215-2225, 1999.Contact-evoked changes in EMG activity during human grasp. 2215 Cutaneous receptors in the digits discharge bursts of activity on contact with an object during human grasp. In this study, we investigated the contribution of this sensory activity to the responses of muscles involved in the task. Twelve subjects performed a standardized precision grasp task without the aid of vision. Electromyographic (EMG) responses in trials when the object was present were compared with those in which the object, and hence the associated afferent responses, were unexpectedly absent. Significant differences in EMG amplitude occurred in the interval 50-100 ms after contact in all subjects and in 33/46 of the muscles sampled. The differences emerged as early as 34 ms after contact and comprised as much as a fourfold change in EMG from 50 to 100 ms after contact with the object. Typically, EMG responses were larger when the object was present (OP), though there were cases, particularly in the thenar muscles, in which the responses increased when the object was absent (OA). Local anesthesia of the thumb and index finger attenuated contact-evoked EMG activity in at least one muscle in all four subjects tested. In one subject, contact-evoked responses were abolished completely during the anesthesia in all four muscles sampled. The results indicate that the sensory activity signaling contact plays a key role in regulating EMG activity during human grasp. Much of this feedback action is attributable to cutaneous receptors in the digits and probably involves both spinal and supraspinal pathways.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. Brochier, R. L. Spinks, M. A. Umilta, and R. N. Lemon
Patterns of Muscle Activity Underlying Object-Specific Grasp by the Macaque Monkey
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2004; 92(3): 1770 - 1782.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A.-S. Augurelle, A. M. Smith, T. Lejeune, and J.-L. Thonnard
Importance of Cutaneous Feedback in Maintaining a Secure Grip During Manipulation of Hand-Held Objects
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2003; 89(2): 665 - 671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. Monzee, Y. Lamarre, and A. M. Smith
The Effects of Digital Anesthesia on Force Control Using a Precision Grip
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2003; 89(2): 672 - 683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. Jenmalm, S. Dahlstedt, and R. S. Johansson
Visual and Tactile Information About Object-Curvature Control Fingertip Forces and Grasp Kinematics in Human Dexterous Manipulation
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2000; 84(6): 2984 - 2997.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
N. S. Bradley and C. Sebelski
Ankle Restraint Modifies Motility at E12 in Chick Embryos
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2000; 83(1): 431 - 440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online