JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 81: 2662-2674, 1999;
0022-3077/99 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (21)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shofner, W. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shofner, W. P.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 81 No. 6 June 1999, pp. 2662-2674
Copyright ©1999 by the American Physiological Society

Responses of Cochlear Nucleus Units in the Chinchilla to Iterated Rippled Noises: Analysis of Neural Autocorrelograms

William P. Shofner

Parmly Hearing Institute, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60626

Shofner, William P. Responses of Cochlear Nucleus Units in the Chinchilla to Iterated Rippled Noises: Analysis of Neural Autocorrelograms. J. Neurophysiol. 81: 2662-2674, 1999.Responses of cochlear nucleus units in the chinchilla to iterated rippled noises: analysis of neural autocorrelograms. Temporal encoding of stimulus features related to the pitch of iterated rippled noises was studied for single units in the chinchilla cochlear nucleus. Unlike other periodic complex sounds that produce pitch, iterated rippled noises have neither periodic waveforms nor highly modulated envelopes. Infinitely iterated rippled noise (IIRN) is generated when wideband noise (WBN) is delayed (tau ), attenuated, and then added to (+) or subtracted from (-) the undelayed WBN through positive feedback. The pitch of IIRN[+, tau , -1 dB] is at 1/tau , whereas the pitch of IIRN[-, tau , -1 dB] is at 1/2tau . Temporal responses of cochlear nucleus units were measured using neural autocorrelograms. Synchronous responses as shown by peaks in neural autocorrelograms that occur at time lags corresponding to the IIRN tau  can be observed for both primarylike and chopper unit types. Comparison of the neural autocorrelograms in response to IIRN[+, tau , -1 dB] and IIRN[-, tau , -1 dB] indicates that the temporal discharge of primarylike units reflects the stimulus waveform fine structure, whereas the temporal discharge patterns of chopper units reflect the stimulus envelope. The pitch of IIRN[±, tau , -1 dB] can be accounted for by the temporal discharge patterns of primarylike units but not by the temporal discharge of chopper units. To quantify the temporal responses, the height of the peak in the neural autocorrelogram at a given time lag was measured as normalized rate. Although it is well documented that chopper units give larger synchronous responses than primarylike units to the fundamental frequency of periodic complex stimuli, the largest normalized rates in response to IIRN[+, tau , -1 dB] were obtained for primarylike units, not chopper units. The results suggest that if temporal encoding is important in pitch processing, then primarylike units are likely to be an important cochlear nucleus subsystem that carries the pitch-related information to higher auditory centers.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Atten Percept PsychophysHome page
W. A. Yost
Pitch perception
Atten Percept Psychophys, November 1, 2009; 71(8): 1701 - 1715.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. W. Lewis, W. J. Talkington, N. A. Walker, G. A. Spirou, A. Jajosky, C. Frum, and J. A. Brefczynski-Lewis
Human Cortical Organization for Processing Vocalizations Indicates Representation of Harmonic Structure as a Signal Attribute
J. Neurosci., February 18, 2009; 29(7): 2283 - 2296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. Sayles and I. M. Winter
Ambiguous Pitch and the Temporal Representation of Inharmonic Iterated Rippled Noise in the Ventral Cochlear Nucleus
J. Neurosci., November 12, 2008; 28(46): 11925 - 11938.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. S. Rothman and P. B. Manis
Differential Expression of Three Distinct Potassium Currents in the Ventral Cochlear Nucleus
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2003; 89(6): 3070 - 3082.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
I. M Winter, L. Wiegrebe, and R. D Patterson
The temporal representation of the delay of iterated rippled noise in the ventral cochlear nucleus of the guinea-pig
J. Physiol., December 1, 2001; 537(2): 553 - 566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. Wiegrebe and I. M. Winter
Temporal Representation of Iterated Rippled Noise as a Function of Delay and Sound Level in the Ventral Cochlear Nucleus
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2001; 85(3): 1206 - 1219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online