JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Neurophysiol 81: 2701-2710, 1999;
0022-3077/99 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vega-Bermudez, F.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, K. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vega-Bermudez, F.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, K. O.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 81 No. 6 June 1999, pp. 2701-2710
Copyright ©1999 by the American Physiological Society

SA1 and RA Receptive Fields, Response Variability, and Population Responses Mapped with a Probe Array

F. Vega-Bermudez and K. O. Johnson

Department of Neuroscience and Krieger Mind/Brain Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218

Vega-Bermudez, F. and K. O. Johnson. SA1 and RA Receptive Fields, Response Variability, and Population Responses Mapped with a Probe Array. J. Neurophysiol. 81: 2701-2710, 1999.SA1 and RA receptive fields, response variability, and population responses mapped with a probe array. Twenty-four slowly adapting type 1 (SA1) and 26 rapidly adapting (RA) cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents in the rhesus monkey were studied with an array of independently controlled, punctate probes that covered an entire fingerpad. Each afferent had a receptive field (RF) on a single fingerpad and was studied at 73 skin sites (50 mm2). The entire array was lowered to 1.6 mm below the point of initial skin contact (the background indentation) before delivering single-probe indentations. SA1 and RA responses differed in several ways. 1) SA1 RF boundaries were affected much less by indentation depth than were RA boundaries, and the SA1 RF areas were much more uniform in size. The mean SA1 RF area grew from 5.1 to 8.8 mm2 as the indentation depth increased from 50 to 500 µm; the mean RA RF area grew from 5.5 to 22.4 mm2 over the same intensity range. 2) SA1 RFs were more elongated than RA RFs. Elongated RFs were oriented in all directions relative to the skin ridges and the finger axis. 3) SA1 impulse rates were linear functions of indentation depth at all probe locations in the RF; RA responses tended toward saturation beginning at 100 µm indentation depth when the probe was over the HS. Similarities between SA1 and RA responses were that 1) both were extremely repeatable with SDs < 1 impulse per trial and 2) both had population responses (number of impulses) that were nearly linear functions of indentation depth. However, SA1s represented increasing indentation depth by increasing impulse rates in a small, relatively constant group of afferents, whereas the RAs represented increasing indentation depth predominantly by the recruitment of new afferents at a distance.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
B. Bliem, J. F. M. Muller-Dahlhaus, H. R. Dinse, and U. Ziemann
Homeostatic Metaplasticity in the Human Somatosensory Cortex
J. Cogn. Neurosci., August 1, 2008; 20(8): 1517 - 1528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
P. D. Marasco and K. C. Catania
Response properties of primary afferents supplying Eimer's organ
J. Exp. Biol., March 1, 2007; 210(5): 765 - 780.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. P. Sripati, S. J. Bensmaia, and K. O. Johnson
A Continuum Mechanical Model of Mechanoreceptive Afferent Responses to Indented Spatial Patterns
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2006; 95(6): 3852 - 3864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. J. Bensmaia, J. C. Craig, T. Yoshioka, and K. O. Johnson
SA1 and RA Afferent Responses to Static and Vibrating Gratings
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2006; 95(3): 1771 - 1782.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
A. P. Sripati, T. Yoshioka, P. Denchev, S. S. Hsiao, and K. O. Johnson
Spatiotemporal Receptive Fields of Peripheral Afferents and Cortical Area 3b and 1 Neurons in the Primate Somatosensory System
J. Neurosci., February 15, 2006; 26(7): 2101 - 2114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. M. Baca, E. E. Thomson, and W. B. Kristan Jr.
Location and Intensity Discrimination in the Leech Local Bend Response Quantified Using Optic Flow and Principal Components Analysis
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2005; 93(6): 3560 - 3572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Hodzic, R. Veit, A. A. Karim, M. Erb, and B. Godde
Improvement and Decline in Tactile Discrimination Behavior after Cortical Plasticity Induced by Passive Tactile Coactivation
J. Neurosci., January 14, 2004; 24(2): 442 - 446.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NeurologyHome page
S. Facchini and S. M. Aglioti
Short term light deprivation increases tactile spatial acuity in humans
Neurology, June 24, 2003; 60(12): 1998 - 1999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
D. Goldreich and I. M. Kanics
Tactile Acuity is Enhanced in Blindness
J. Neurosci., April 15, 2003; 23(8): 3439 - 3445.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. N. S. Sachdev and K. C. Catania
Receptive Fields and Response Properties of Neurons in the Star-Nosed Mole's Somatosensory Fovea
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2002; 87(5): 2602 - 2611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
H. E. Wheat and A. W. Goodwin
Tactile Discrimination of Edge Shape: Limits on Spatial Resolution Imposed by Parameters of the Peripheral Neural Population
J. Neurosci., October 1, 2001; 21(19): 7751 - 7763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
B. Pleger, H. R. Dinse, P. Ragert, P. Schwenkreis, J. P. Malin, and M. Tegenthoff
Shifts in cortical representations predict human discrimination improvement
PNAS, September 26, 2001; (2001) 191176298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
H. E. Wheat and A. W. Goodwin
Tactile Discrimination of Gaps by Slowly Adapting Afferents: Effects of Population Parameters and Anisotropy in the Fingerpad
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2000; 84(3): 1430 - 1444.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. W. Bisley, A. W. Goodwin, and H. E. Wheat
Slowly Adapting Type I Afferents From the Sides and End of the Finger Respond to Stimuli on the Center of the Fingerpad
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2000; 84(1): 57 - 64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NeurologyHome page
R. W. V. Boven, R. H. Hamilton, T. Kauffman, J. P. Keenan, and A. Pascual-Leone
Tactile spatial resolution in blind Braille readers
Neurology, June 27, 2000; 54(12): 2230 - 2236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. S. Khalsa, C. Zhang, and Y.-X. Qin
Encoding of Location and Intensity of Noxious Indentation Into Rat Skin by Spatial Populations of Cutaneous Mechano-Nociceptors
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2000; 83(5): 3049 - 3061.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
F. Vega-Bermudez and K. O. Johnson
Surround Suppression in the Responses of Primate SA1 and RA Mechanoreceptive Afferents Mapped with a Probe Array
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 1999; 81(6): 2711 - 2719.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
B. Pleger, H. R. Dinse, P. Ragert, P. Schwenkreis, J. P. Malin, and M. Tegenthoff
Shifts in cortical representations predict human discrimination improvement
PNAS, October 9, 2001; 98(21): 12255 - 12260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online