JN Watch the video to see how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 82: 237-247, 1999;
0022-3077/99 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barry, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barry, M. A.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 82 No. 1 July 1999, pp. 237-247
Copyright ©1999 by the American Physiological Society

Recovery of Functional Response in the Nucleus of the Solitary Tract After Peripheral Gustatory Nerve Crush and Regeneration

Michael A. Barry

Department of BioStructure and Function and Neuroscience Program, School of Dental Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut 06030-3705

Barry, Michael A. Recovery of Functional Response in the Nucleus of the Solitary Tract After Peripheral Gustatory Nerve Crush and Regeneration. J. Neurophysiol. 82: 237-247, 1999.Single-unit recording and transganglionic tracing techniques were used to assess the properties of, and inputs to, neurons within the rostral nucleus of the solitary tract (NST) after peripheral gustatory nerve injury and regeneration in adult hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus). Tastant-evoked responses were recorded from 43 neurons in animals in which the ipsilateral chorda tympani (CT) nerve was crushed 8 wk earlier (experimental animals) and from 46 neurons in unlesioned control animals. The 89 neurons were separated into three functional clusters named according to the best stimulus for neurons in the cluster: S, sucrose; N, sodium acetate; and H, HCl or KCl. Stimulus-evoked spike rates across all stimuli were 35.4 ± 4.4% lower in the experimental hamsters. The largest difference in evoked spike rates occurred for neurons in the H cluster, in which the response to KCl also was delayed relative to normal responses. The response of S-cluster units to sucrose and saccharin was also lower in the experimental animals. The mean response rate and the time course of response of neurons in the N cluster did not differ between the two groups. For each cluster, the spontaneous rates and mean response profiles across eight stimuli were very similar in the experimental and control animals, and the breadth of tuning hardly differed. In both groups, Na+ responses in the N cluster were amiloride sensitive, and responses to the water rinse after stimulation with HCl were common in the S cluster. At 8-20 wk after nerve crush, biotinylated dextran tracing of the CT nerve revealed that the regenerated CT fibers did not sprout outside the normal terminal zone in the NST, but the density of the central terminal fibers was 36.9 ± 6.35% lower than normal. After CT nerve crush and regeneration, the overall reduction in taste-evoked spike rates in NST neurons is likely a consequence of this change in terminal fibers; this in turn likely results from the known reduction in CT fibers regenerating past the crush site. In the face of this reduction, the normal taste-evoked spike rate in N-cluster neurons requires explanation. The observed recovery of normal specificity could be mediated by a restoration of specific connections by primary afferent fibers peripherally and centrally or by central compensatory mechanisms.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
C.-S. Li, L. Mao, and Y. K. Cho
Taste-responsive neurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract receive gustatory information from both sides of the tongue in the hamster
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2008; 294(2): R372 - R381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
D. L. Hill
Nerve-Target Interactions in the Gustatory System Following Unilateral Chorda Tympani Nerve Section
Chem Senses, January 1, 2005; 30(suppl_1): i64 - i65.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
L. C. Geran, M. Garcea, and A. C. Spector
Nerve regeneration-induced recovery of quinine avoidance after complete gustatory deafferentation of the tongue
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2004; 287(5): R1235 - R1243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
K. Yasumatsu, H. Katsukawa, K. Sasamoto, and Y. Ninomiya
Recovery of Amiloride-Sensitive Neural Coding during Regeneration of the Gustatory Nerve: Behavioral-Neural Correlation of Salt Taste Discrimination
J. Neurosci., May 15, 2003; 23(10): 4362 - 4368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
S. J. St. John, M. Garcea, and A. C. Spector
The Time Course of Taste Bud Regeneration after Glossopharyngeal or Greater Superficial Petrosal Nerve Transection in Rats
Chem Senses, January 1, 2003; 28(1): 33 - 43.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. M. Rogers and P. L. Newland
Gustatory Processing in Thoracic Local Circuits of Locusts
J. Neurosci., September 15, 2002; 22(18): 8324 - 8333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. T. King, M. Garcea, and A. C. Spector
Glossopharyngeal Nerve Regeneration Is Essential for the Complete Recovery of Quinine-Stimulated Oromotor Rejection Behaviors and Central Patterns of Neuronal Activity in the Nucleus of the Solitary Tract in the Rat
J. Neurosci., November 15, 2000; 20(22): 8426 - 8434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online