JN Miami Valley Hospital
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 82: 874-890, 1999;
0022-3077/99 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anzai, A.
Right arrow Articles by Freeman, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anzai, A.
Right arrow Articles by Freeman, R. D.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 82 No. 2 August 1999, pp. 874-890
Copyright ©1999 by the American Physiological Society

Neural Mechanisms for Encoding Binocular Disparity: Receptive Field Position Versus Phase

Akiyuki Anzai, Izumi Ohzawa, and Ralph D. Freeman

Group in Vision Science, School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-2020

Anzai, Akiyuki, Izumi Ohzawa, and Ralph D. Freeman. Neural Mechanisms for Encoding Binocular Disparity: Receptive Field Position Versus Phase. J. Neurophysiol. 82: 874-890, 1999. The visual system uses binocular disparity to discriminate the relative depth of objects in space. Because the striate cortex is the first site along the central visual pathways at which signals from the left and right eyes converge onto a single neuron, encoding of binocular disparity is thought to begin in this region. There are two possible mechanisms for encoding binocular disparity through simple cells in the striate cortex: a difference in receptive field (RF) position between the two eyes (RF position disparity) and a difference in RF profiles between the two eyes (RF phase disparity). Although there is evidence that supports each of these schemes, both mechanisms have not been examined in a single study to determine their relative roles. In this study, we have measured RF position and phase disparities of individual simple cells in the cat's striate cortex to address this issue. Using a sophisticated RF mapping technique that employs binary m-sequences, we have obtained left and right eye RF profiles of two or more cells recorded simultaneously. A version of the reference-cell method was used to estimate RF position disparity. We find that RF position disparities generally are limited to values that are not sufficient to encode large binocular disparities. In contrast, RF phase disparities cover a wide range of binocular disparities and exhibit dependencies on RF orientation and spatial frequency in a manner expected for a mechanism that encodes binocular disparity. These results suggest that binocular disparity is encoded mainly through RF phase disparity. However, RF position disparity may play a significant role for cells with high spatial frequency selectivity that are constrained to have only small RF phase disparities.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. Tanabe and B. G. Cumming
Mechanisms Underlying the Transformation of Disparity Signals from V1 to V2 in the Macaque
J. Neurosci., October 29, 2008; 28(44): 11304 - 11314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
E. K. C. Tsang and B. E. Shi
Normalization Enables Robust Validation of Disparity Estimates from Neural Populations
Neural Comput., October 1, 2008; 20(10): 2464 - 2490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
E. A. Allen and R. D. Freeman
Dynamic spatial processing originates in early visual pathways.
J. Neurosci., November 8, 2006; 26(45): 11763 - 11774.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
H. Tanaka and I. Ohzawa
Neural basis for stereopsis from second-order contrast cues.
J. Neurosci., April 19, 2006; 26(16): 4370 - 4382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
R. Perez, A. F. Castro, M. S. Justo, M. A. Bermudez, and F. Gonzalez
Retinal Correspondence of Monocular Receptive Fields in Disparity-Sensitive Complex Cells from Area V1 in the Awake Monkey
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2005; 46(4): 1533 - 1539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
J. C.A. Read and B. G. Cumming
Understanding the Cortical Specialization for Horizontal Disparity
Neural Comput., October 1, 2004; 16(10): 1983 - 2020.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
Y. Chen and N. Qian
A Coarse-to-Fine Disparity Energy Model with Both Phase-Shift and Position-Shift Receptive Field Mechanisms
Neural Comput., August 1, 2004; 16(8): 1545 - 1577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
E. K. C. Tsang and B. E. Shi
A Preference for Phase-Based Disparity in a Neuromorphic Implementation of the Binocular Energy Model
Neural Comput., August 1, 2004; 16(8): 1579 - 1600.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. D. Menz and R. D. Freeman
Temporal Dynamics of Binocular Disparity Processing in the Central Visual Pathway
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2004; 91(4): 1782 - 1793.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. D. Menz and R. D. Freeman
Functional Connectivity of Disparity-Tuned Neurons in the Visual Cortex
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2004; 91(4): 1794 - 1807.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Qiu, C. E. Schreiner, and M. A. Escabi
Gabor Analysis of Auditory Midbrain Receptive Fields: Spectro-Temporal and Binaural Composition
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2003; 90(1): 456 - 476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. C. DeAngelis and T. Uka
Coding of Horizontal Disparity and Velocity by MT Neurons in the Alert Macaque
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2003; 89(2): 1094 - 1111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S.J.D. Prince, A. D. Pointon, B. G. Cumming, and A. J. Parker
Quantitative Analysis of the Responses of V1 Neurons to Horizontal Disparity in Dynamic Random-Dot Stereograms
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2002; 87(1): 191 - 208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S.J.D. Prince, B. G. Cumming, and A. J. Parker
Range and Mechanism of Encoding of Horizontal Disparity in Macaque V1
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2002; 87(1): 209 - 221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Anzai, I. Ohzawa, and R. D. Freeman
Neural Mechanisms for Processing Binocular Information I. Simple Cells
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 891 - 908.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Anzai, I. Ohzawa, and R. D. Freeman
Neural Mechanisms for Processing Binocular Information II. Complex Cells
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 909 - 924.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online