The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 82 No. 5 November 1999, pp. 2765-2775
Copyright ©1999 by the American Physiological Society

Electrophysiological Properties and Synaptic Responses of Cells in the Trigeminal Principal Sensory Nucleus of Postnatal Rats

Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy and Neuroscience Center of Excellence, Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112

Lo, Fu-Sun, William Guido, and Reha S. Erzurumlu. Electrophysiological Properties and Synaptic Responses of Cells in the Trigeminal Principal Sensory Nucleus of Postnatal Rats. J. Neurophysiol. 82: 2765-2775, 1999. In the rodent brain stem trigeminal complex, select sets of neurons form modular arrays or "barrelettes," that replicate the patterned distribution of whiskers and sinus hairs on the ipsilateral snout. These cells detect the patterned input from the trigeminal axons that innervate the whiskers and sinus hairs. Other brain stem trigeminal cells, interbarrelette neurons, do not form patterns and respond to multiple whiskers. We examined the membrane properties and synaptic responses of morphologically identified barrelette and interbarrelette neurons in the principal sensory nucleus (PrV) of the trigeminal nerve in early postnatal rats shortly after whisker-related patterns are established. Barrelette cell dendritic trees are confined to a single barrelette, whereas the dendrites of interbarrelette cells span wider territories. These two cell types are distinct from smaller GABAergic interneurons. Barrelette cells can be distinguished by a prominent transient A-type K⁺ current (I_A) and higher input resistance. On the other hand, interbarrelette cells display a prominent low-threshold T-type Ca²⁺ current (I_T) and lower input resistance. Both classes of neurons respond differently to electrical stimulation of the trigeminal tract. Barrelette cells show either a monosynaptic excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) followed by a large disynaptic inhibitory postsynaptic potential (IPSP) or just simply a disynaptic IPSP. Increasing stimulus intensity produces little change in EPSP amplitude but leads to a stepwise increase in IPSP amplitude, suggesting that barrelette cells receive more inhibitory input than excitatory input. This pattern of excitation and inhibition indicates that barrelette cells receive both feed-forward and lateral inhibition. Interbarrelette cells show a large monosynaptic EPSP followed by a small disynaptic IPSP. Increasing stimulus intensity leads to a stepwise increase in EPSP amplitude and the appearance of polysynaptic EPSPs, suggesting that interbarrelette cells receive excitatory inputs from multiple sources. Taken together, these results indicate that barrelette and interbarrelette neurons can be identified by their morphological and functional attributes soon after whisker-related pattern formation in the PrV.