JN AJP: Endocrinology and Metabolism
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 82: 3236-3253, 1999;
0022-3077/99 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gandhi, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by Keller, E. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gandhi, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by Keller, E. L.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 82 No. 6 December 1999, pp. 3236-3253
Copyright ©1999 by the American Physiological Society

Comparison of Saccades Perturbed by Stimulation of the Rostral Superior Colliculus, the Caudal Superior Colliculus, and the Omnipause Neuron Region

Neeraj J. Gandhi1,2,3 and Edward L. Keller2,3

 1Graduate Group in Bioengineering, University of California, San Francisco 94143;  2Graduate Group in Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley 94720; and  3The Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, California 94115

Gandhi, Neeraj J. and Edward L. Keller. Comparison of Saccades Perturbed by Stimulation of the Rostral Superior Colliculus, the Caudal Superior Colliculus, and the Omnipause Neuron Region. J. Neurophysiol. 82: 3236-3253, 1999. Over the past decade, considerable research efforts have been focused on the role of the rostral superior colliculus (SC) in control of saccades. The most recent theory separates the deeper intermediate layers of the SC into two functional regions: the rostral pole of these layers constitutes a fixation zone and the caudal region comprises the saccade zone. Sustained activity of fixation neurons in the fixation zone is argued to maintain fixation and help prevent saccade generation by exciting the omnipause neurons (OPNs) in the brain stem. This hypothesis is in contrast to the traditional view that the SC contains a topographic representation of the saccade motor map on which the rostral pole of the SC encodes signals for generating small saccades (<2°) instead of preventing them. There is therefore an unresolved controversy about the specific role on the most rostral region of the SC, and we reexamined its functional contribution by quantifying and comparing spatial and temporal trajectories of 30° saccades perturbed by electrical stimulation of the rostral pole and more caudal regions in the SC and of the OPN region. If the rostral pole serves to preserve fixation, then saccades perturbed by stimulation should closely resemble interrupted saccades produced by stimulation of the OPN region. If it also contributes to saccade generation, then the disrupted movements would better compare with redirected saccades observed after stimulation of the caudal SC. Our experiments revealed two significant findings: 1) the locus of stimulation was the primary factor determining the perturbation effect. If the directions of the target-directed saccade and stimulation-evoked saccade were aligned and if the stimulation was delivered within approximately the rostral 2 mm (<10° amplitude) of SC, the ongoing saccade stopped in midflight but then resumed after stimulation end to reach the original visually specified goal with close to normal accuracy. When stimulation was applied at more caudal sites, the ongoing saccade directly reached the target location without stopping at an intermediate position. If the directions differed considerably, both initial and resumed components were typically observed for all stimulation sites. 2) A quantitative analysis of the saccades perturbed from the fixation zone showed significant deviations from their control spatial trajectories. Thus they resembled redirected saccades induced by caudal SC stimulation and differed significantly from interrupted saccades produced by OPN stimulation. The amplitude of the initial saccade, latency of perturbation, and spatial redirection were greatest for the most caudal sites and decreased gradually for rostral sites. For stimulation sites within the rostral pole of SC, the measures formed a smooth continuation of the trends observed in the saccade zone. As these results argue for the saccade zone concept, we offer reinterpretations of the data used to support the fixation zone model. However, we also discuss scenarios that do not allow an outright rejection of the fixation zone hypothesis.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
W. Y. Choi and D. Guitton
Firing Patterns in Superior Colliculus of Head-Unrestrained Monkey during Normal and Perturbed Gaze Saccades Reveal Short-Latency Feedback and a Sluggish Rostral Shift in Activity
J. Neurosci., June 3, 2009; 29(22): 7166 - 7180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
V. Reyes-Puerta, R. Philipp, W. Lindner, L. Lunenburger, and K.-P. Hoffmann
Influence of Task Predictability on the Activity of Neurons in the Rostral Superior Colliculus During Double-Step Saccades
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2009; 101(6): 3199 - 3211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
R. Ptak, A. Schnider, L. Golay, and R. Muri
A non-spatial bias favouring fixated stimuli revealed in patients with spatial neglect
Brain, December 1, 2007; 130(12): 3211 - 3222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. C. Dorris, E. Olivier, and D. P. Munoz
Competitive Integration of Visual and Preparatory Signals in the Superior Colliculus during Saccadic Programming
J. Neurosci., May 9, 2007; 27(19): 5053 - 5062.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. J. H. Ludwig, J. W. Mildinhall, and I. D. Gilchrist
A Population Coding Account for Systematic Variation in Saccadic Dead Time
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 795 - 805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
S. Ramat, R. J. Leigh, D. S. Zee, and L. M. Optican
What clinical disorders tell us about the neural control of saccadic eye movements
Brain, January 1, 2007; 130(1): 10 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Takahashi, Y. Sugiuchi, Y. Izawa, and Y. Shinoda
Commissural Excitation and Inhibition by the Superior Colliculus in Tectoreticular Neurons Projecting to Omnipause Neuron and Inhibitory Burst Neuron Regions
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2005; 94(3): 1707 - 1726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. H. Bell, M. A. Meredith, A. J. Van Opstal, and D. P. Munoz
Crossmodal Integration in the Primate Superior Colliculus Underlying the Preparation and Initiation of Saccadic Eye Movements
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2005; 93(6): 3659 - 3673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
N. J. Gandhi and D. K. Bonadonna
Temporal Interactions of Air-Puff-Evoked Blinks and Saccadic Eye Movements: Insights Into Motor Preparation
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2005; 93(3): 1718 - 1729.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
Y. Sugiuchi, Y. Izawa, M. Takahashi, J. Na, and Y. Shinoda
Physiological Characterization of Synaptic Inputs to Inhibitory Burst Neurons From the Rostral and Caudal Superior Colliculus
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2005; 93(2): 697 - 712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. Goffart, L. L. Chen, and D. L. Sparks
Deficits in Saccades and Fixation During Muscimol Inactivation of the Caudal Fastigial Nucleus in the Rhesus Monkey
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2004; 92(6): 3351 - 3367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
Y. Izawa, H. Suzuki, and Y. Shinoda
Suppression of Visually and Memory-Guided Saccades Induced by Electrical Stimulation of the Monkey Frontal Eye Field. II. Suppression of Bilateral Saccades
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2004; 92(4): 2261 - 2273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
N. Amador, M. Schlag-Rey, and J. Schlag
Primate Antisaccade. II. Supplementary Eye Field Neuronal Activity Predicts Correct Performance
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2004; 91(4): 1672 - 1689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. M. McPeek, J. H. Han, and E. L. Keller
Competition Between Saccade Goals in the Superior Colliculus Produces Saccade Curvature
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2003; 89(5): 2577 - 2590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Bergeron and D. Guitton
In Multiple-Step Gaze Shifts: Omnipause (OPNs) and Collicular Fixation Neurons Encode Gaze Position Error; OPNs Gate Saccades
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2002; 88(4): 1726 - 1742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. D. Van Beuzekom and J.A.M. Van Gisbergen
Collicular Microstimulation During Passive Rotation Does Not Generate Fixed Gaze Shifts
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2002; 87(6): 2946 - 2963.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. J. Krauzlis, M. A. Basso, and R. H. Wurtz
Discharge Properties of Neurons in the Rostral Superior Colliculus of the Monkey During Smooth-Pursuit Eye Movements
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2000; 84(2): 876 - 891.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
N. J. Gandhi and E. L. Keller
Activity of the Brain Stem Omnipause Neurons During Saccades Perturbed by Stimulation of the Primate Superior Colliculus
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 1999; 82(6): 3254 - 3267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online