JN  AJP: Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 82: 3254-3267, 1999;
0022-3077/99 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gandhi, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by Keller, E. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gandhi, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by Keller, E. L.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 82 No. 6 December 1999, pp. 3254-3267
Copyright ©1999 by the American Physiological Society

Activity of the Brain Stem Omnipause Neurons During Saccades Perturbed by Stimulation of the Primate Superior Colliculus

Neeraj J. Gandhi1,2,3 and Edward L. Keller2,3

 1Graduate Group in Bioengineering, University of California, San Francisco 94143;  2Graduate Group in Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley 94720; and  3The Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, California 94115

Gandhi, Neeraj J. and Edward L. Keller. Activity of the Brain Stem Omnipause Neurons During Saccades Perturbed by Stimulation of the Primate Superior Colliculus. J. Neurophysiol. 82: 3254-3267, 1999. Stimulation of the rostral ~2 mm of the superior colliculus (SC) during a large, visual target-initiated saccade produces a spatial deviation of the ongoing saccade and then stops it in midflight. After the termination of the stimulation, the saccade resumes and ends near the location of the flashed target. The density of collicular projections to the omnipause neuron (OPN) region is greatest from the rostral SC and decreases gradually for the more caudal regions. It has been hypothesized that the microstimulation excites the OPNs through these direct connections, and the reactivation of OPNs, which are normally silent during saccades, stops the initial component in midflight by gating off the saccadic burst generator. Two predictions emerge from this hypothesis: 1) for microstimulation triggered on the onset of large saccades, the time from stimulation onset to resumption of OPN discharge should decrease as the stimulation site is moved rostral and 2) the lead time from reactivation of OPNs to the end of the initial saccade on stimulation trials should be equal to the lead time of pause end with respect to the end of control saccades. We tested this hypothesis by recording OPN activity during saccades perturbed by stimulation of the rostral ~2 mm of the SC. The distance of the stimulation site from the most rostral extent of the SC and the time of reactivation with respect to stimulation onset were not significantly correlated. The mean lead of reactivation of OPNs relative to the end of the initial component of perturbed saccades (6.5 ms) was significantly less than the mean lead with respect to the end of control (9.6 ms) and resumed saccades (10.4 ms). These results do not support the notion that the excitatory input from SC neurons---in particular, the fixation neurons in the rostral SC---provide the major signal to reactivate OPNs and end saccades. An alternative, conceptual model to explain the temporal sequence of events induced by stimulation of the SC during large saccades is presented. Other OPN activity parameters also were measured and compared for control and stimulation conditions. The onset of pause with respect to resumed saccade onset was larger and more variable than the onset of pause with respect to control saccades, whereas pause end with respect to the end of resumed and control saccades was similar. The reactivated discharge of OPNs during the period between the end of the initial and the onset of the resumed saccades was at least as strong as that following control movements. This latter observation is interpreted in terms of the resettable neural integrator hypothesis.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
N. J. Gandhi and D. L. Sparks
Dissociation of Eye and Head Components of Gaze Shifts by Stimulation of the Omnipause Neuron Region
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2007; 98(1): 360 - 373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. G. Constantin, H. Wang, and J. D. Crawford
Role of Superior Colliculus in Adaptive Eye-Head Coordination During Gaze Shifts
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2004; 92(4): 2168 - 2184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. Arai, R. M. McPeek, and E. L. Keller
Properties of Saccadic Responses in Monkey When Multiple Competing Visual Stimuli Are Present
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2004; 91(2): 890 - 900.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Bergeron and D. Guitton
In Multiple-Step Gaze Shifts: Omnipause (OPNs) and Collicular Fixation Neurons Encode Gaze Position Error; OPNs Gate Saccades
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2002; 88(4): 1726 - 1742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
N. J. Gandhi and E. L. Keller
Comparison of Saccades Perturbed by Stimulation of the Rostral Superior Colliculus, the Caudal Superior Colliculus, and the Omnipause Neuron Region
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 1999; 82(6): 3236 - 3253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online