JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 83: 659-670, 2000;
0022-3077/00 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robert, A.
Right arrow Articles by Waxman, S. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Robert, A.
Right arrow Articles by Waxman, S. G.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 83 No. 2 February 2000, pp. 659-670
Copyright ©2000 by the American Physiological Society

Development of Glutamatergic Synaptic Activity in Cultured Spinal Neurons

Antoine Robert,1 James R. Howe,2 and Stephen G. Waxman1

 1Department of Neurology and Paralyzed Veterans of America-Eastern Paralyzed Veterans Association Neuroscience Research Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven 06510; Rehabilitation Research Center, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, West Haven 06516; and  2Department of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510

Robert, Antoine, James R. Howe, and Stephen G. Waxman. Development of Glutamatergic Synaptic Activity in Cultured Spinal Neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 83: 659-670, 2000. The development of glutamatergic synapses involves a sequence of events that are still not well understood. We have studied the time course of the development of glutamatergic synapses in cultured spinal neurons by characterizing spontaneous synaptic currents recorded from cells maintained in vitro for different times. At short times in culture (2 days in vitro; DIV2), spontaneous synaptic activity consisted almost solely of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor (NMDAR) openings. In contrast, older neurons (DIV5 to DIV8) displayed clear alpha -amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptor (AMPAR)-mediated synaptic currents, while the NMDAR-mediated activity remained small. Between 8 and 14 days in vitro there was a large increase in the density of synaptically activated NMDARs, although there was no significant increase in the density of the NMDAR-mediated current activated by exogenous glutamate. The results indicate that there is a switch in NMDAR targeting from somatic to synaptic regions during the course of the second in vitro week. Finally, our results support the conclusion that the spontaneous synaptic activity displayed in culture depends on ongoing NMDAR-mediated activity, even when the expression of synaptic NMDARs is low.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online