|
|
||||||||
The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 83 No. 2 February 2000, pp. 796-807
Copyright ©2000 by the American Physiological Society
Department of Physiological Sciences, Section for Neuroscience, Lund University, S-223 62 Lund, Sweden
Ivarsson, Magnus and
Pär Svensson.
Conditioned Eyeblink Response Consists of Two Distinct
Components. J. Neurophysiol. 83: 796-807, 2000. The aim of these experiments was to obtain a detailed
knowledge of how the orbicularis oculi muscle is activated during the execution of a conditioned eyeblink response (CR). This is the first
critical step to understand the underlying neural mechanisms involved
in the control of the CR. Decerebrate ferrets were trained in a
classical conditioning paradigm. The conditioned stimulus (CS) was a
train of electrical stimuli (15 pulses, 50 Hz, 1 mA) applied to the
forelimb, and the unconditioned stimulus (US) was a train of electrical
stimuli (3 pulses, 50 Hz, 3-4 mA) to the periorbital region. The CRs
were studied by recording electromyograms (EMGs) from the orbicularis
oculi muscle. The eyeblink CR in all animals showed a similar
topography with at least two different components, CR1 and CR2, which
were expressed at different rates. CR1 appeared first during
acquisition, had a shorter onset latency, and was more phasic and more
resistant to extinction than CR2. A marked pause in the muscle activity
separated the two components. To control that the two-component CR were
not species, paradigm or preparation specific, awake rabbits were
trained with a tone CS (300 ms, 4 kHz, 64 dB) and a train of
periorbital stimuli as US (3 pulses, 50 Hz, 3 mA). CR1 and CR2 were
present in the rabbit eyeblink CR. The cerebellum is implicated in the
control of CRs and to study whether separate neural pathways were
responsible for CR1 and CR2, direct brachium pontis stimulation was
used to replace the forelimb CS. CR1 and CR2 were present in the CR
elicited by the brachium pontis CS. The presence of CR1 and CR2 after a unilateral lesion of the brachium conjunctivum shows that output from
the contralateral cerebellar hemisphere was not the cause for any of
the components. Other mechanisms that might be involved in the
separation of the CR into two components are discussed. The results
show that the eyeblink CR consists of at least two components, CR1 and
CR2, which most likely originate either as a direct central command
from the cerebellum or in the output pathway before the facial nucleus.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |