|
|
||||||||
The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 83 No. 2 February 2000, pp. 828-835
Copyright ©2000 by the American Physiological Society
1Department of Neurobiology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095; 2Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health; and 3Laboratory of Developmental Neurobiology, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
Latham, P. E.,
B. J. Richmond,
S. Nirenberg, and
P. G. Nelson.
Intrinsic Dynamics in Neuronal Networks. II. Experiment. J. Neurophysiol. 83: 828-835, 2000. Neurons in many regions of the mammalian CNS remain active in the
absence of stimuli. This activity falls into two main patterns: steady
firing at low rates and rhythmic bursting. How these firing patterns
are maintained in the presence of powerful recurrent excitation, and
how networks switch between them, is not well understood. In the
previous paper, we addressed these issues theoretically; in this paper
we address them experimentally. We found in both studies that a key
parameter in controlling firing patterns is the fraction of
endogenously active cells. The theoretical analysis indicated that
steady firing rates are possible only when the fraction of endogenously
active cells is above some threshold, that there is a transition to
bursting when it falls below that threshold, and that networks becomes
silent when the fraction drops to zero. Experimentally, we found that
all steadily firing cultures contain endogenously active cells, and
that reducing the fraction of such cells in steadily firing cultures
causes a transition to bursting. The latter finding implies indirectly that the elimination of endogenously active cells would cause a
permanent drop to zero firing rate. The experiments described here thus
corroborate the theoretical analysis.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Cui, C. C. Canavier, and R. J. Butera Functional Phase Response Curves: A Method for Understanding Synchronization of Adapting Neurons J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2009; 102(1): 387 - 398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Wagenaar, R. Madhavan, J. Pine, and S. M. Potter Controlling Bursting in Cortical Cultures with Closed-Loop Multi-Electrode Stimulation J. Neurosci., January 19, 2005; 25(3): 680 - 688. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Izhikevich, J. A. Gally, and G. M. Edelman Spike-timing Dynamics of Neuronal Groups Cereb Cortex, August 1, 2004; 14(8): 933 - 944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Opitz, A. D. De Lima, and T. Voigt Spontaneous Development of Synchronous Oscillatory Activity During Maturation of Cortical Networks In Vitro J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2002; 88(5): 2196 - 2206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. E. Latham, B. J. Richmond, P. G. Nelson, and S. Nirenberg Intrinsic Dynamics in Neuronal Networks. I. Theory J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2000; 83(2): 808 - 827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |