JN Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 83: 1900-1911, 2000;
0022-3077/00 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brincat, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Westheimer, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brincat, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Westheimer, G.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 83 No. 4 April 2000, pp. 1900-1911
Copyright ©2000 by the American Physiological Society

Integration of Foveal Orientation Signals: Distinct Local and Long-Range Spatial Domains

Scott L. Brincat and Gerald Westheimer

Division of Neurobiology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720

Brincat, Scott L. and Gerald Westheimer. Integration of Foveal Orientation Signals: Distinct Local and Long-Range Spatial Domains. J. Neurophysiol. 83: 1900-1911, 2000. Human observers can discriminate the orientation of a stimulus configuration composed of a pair of collinear visual patterns much better than that of a single component pattern alone. Previous investigations of this type of orientation signal integration and of other similar visual integrative functions have shown that, for closely spaced elements, there is integration only for stimuli with the same contrast polarity (i.e., both lighter or both darker than the background) but, at greater separations, integration is independent of contrast polarity. Is this effect specific to differences in contrast polarity, which is known to be an important parameter in the organization of the visual system, or might there be a cluster of other stimulus dimensions that show similar effects, indicating a more widespread distinction between the processes limiting integration at local and long-range spatial scales? Here, we report a similar distance dependence for orientation signal integration across stimulus differences in binocular disparity, direction of motion, and direction of figure-ground assignment. We also demonstrate that the selectivity found at short separations cannot be explained only by "end-cuts," the small borders created at the junction of abutting contrasting patterns. These findings imply the existence of two distinct spatial domains for the integration of foveal orientation information: a local zone in which integration is highly selective for a number of salient stimulus parameters and a long-range domain in which integration is relatively unselective and only requires that patterns be roughly collinear.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online