|
|
||||||||
The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 83 No. 4 April 2000, pp. 1932-1940
Copyright ©2000 by the American Physiological Society
Department of Neurobiology, Life Science Institute and Center for Neural Computation, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91904, Israel
Cohen, Dana and
Yosef Yarom.
Cerebellar On-Beam and Lateral Inhibition: Two Functionally
Distinct Circuits. J. Neurophysiol. 83: 1932-1940, 2000. Optical imaging of voltage-sensitive dyes in an
isolated cerebellum preparation was used to study the spatiotemporal
functional organization of the inhibitory systems in the cerebellar
cortex. Responses to surface stimulation of the cortex reveal two
physiologically distinct inhibitory systems, which we refer to as
lateral and on-beam inhibition following classical terminology. Lateral
inhibition occurs throughout the area responding to a stimulus, whereas
on-beam inhibition is confined to the area directly excited by parallel fibers. The time course of the lateral inhibition is twice as long as
that of the on-beam inhibition. Both inhibitory responses increase with
stimulus intensity, but the lateral inhibition has a lower threshold,
and it saturates at lower stimulus intensity. The amplitude of the
on-beam inhibition is linearly related to the excitation at the same
location, whereas that of the lateral inhibition is linearly related to
the excitation at the center of the beam. Repetitive stimulation is
required to activate on-beam inhibition, whereas the same stimulus
paradigm reveals prolonged depression of the lateral inhibition. We
conclude that lateral inhibition reflects the activation of molecular
layer interneurons, and its major role is to increase the excitability
of the activated area by disinhibition. The on-beam inhibition most
likely reflects Golgi cell inhibition of granule cells. However,
Purkinje cell collateral inhibition of Golgi cells cannot be excluded.
Both possibilities suggest that the role of the on-beam inhibition is
to efficiently modulate, in time and space, the mossy fiber input to
the cerebellar cortex.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S.-L. Shin and E. De Schutter Dynamic Synchronization of Purkinje Cell Simple Spikes J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 3485 - 3491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Gao, G. Chen, K. C. Reinert, and T. J. Ebner Cerebellar cortical molecular layer inhibition is organized in parasagittal zones. J. Neurosci., August 9, 2006; 26(32): 8377 - 8387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Sullivan, A. Nimmerjahn, D. V. Sarkisov, F. Helmchen, and S. S.-H. Wang In Vivo Calcium Imaging of Circuit Activity in Cerebellar Cortex J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2005; 94(2): 1636 - 1644. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Mann-Metzer and Y. Yarom Pre- and Postsynaptic Inhibition Mediated by GABAB Receptors in Cerebellar Inhibitory Interneurons J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2002; 87(1): 183 - 190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Contreras and R. Llinas Voltage-Sensitive Dye Imaging of Neocortical Spatiotemporal Dynamics to Afferent Activation Frequency J. Neurosci., December 1, 2001; 21(23): 9403 - 9413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |