JN Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 83: 3230-3240, 2000;
0022-3077/00 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cohn, J. V.
Right arrow Articles by Lackner, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cohn, J. V.
Right arrow Articles by Lackner, J. R.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 83 No. 6 June 2000, pp. 3230-3240
Copyright ©2000 by the American Physiological Society

Reaching During Virtual Rotation: Context Specific Compensations for Expected Coriolis Forces

Joseph V. Cohn, Paul DiZio, and James R. Lackner

Ashton Graybiel Spatial Orientation Laboratory and Volen Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454-9110

Cohn, Joseph V., Paul DiZio, and James R. Lackner. Reaching During Virtual Rotation: Context Specific Compensations for Expected Coriolis Forces. J. Neurophysiol. 83: 3230-3240, 2000. Subjects who are in an enclosed chamber rotating at constant velocity feel physically stationary but make errors when pointing to targets. Reaching paths and endpoints are deviated in the direction of the transient inertial Coriolis forces generated by their arm movements. By contrast, reaching movements made during natural, voluntary torso rotation seem to be accurate, and subjects are unaware of the Coriolis forces generated by their movements. This pattern suggests that the motor plan for reaching movements uses a representation of body motion to prepare compensations for impending self-generated accelerative loads on the arm. If so, stationary subjects who are experiencing illusory self-rotation should make reaching errors when pointing to a target. These errors should be in the direction opposite the Coriolis accelerations their arm movements would generate if they were actually rotating. To determine whether such compensations exist, we had subjects in four experiments make visually open-loop reaches to targets while they were experiencing compelling illusory self-rotation and displacement induced by rotation of a complex, natural visual scene. The paths and endpoints of their initial reaching movements were significantly displaced leftward during counterclockwise illusory rotary displacement and rightward during clockwise illusory self-displacement. Subjects reached in a curvilinear path to the wrong place. These reaching errors were opposite in direction to the Coriolis forces that would have been generated by their arm movements during actual torso rotation. The magnitude of path curvature and endpoint errors increased as the speed of illusory self-rotation increased. In successive reaches, movement paths became straighter and endpoints more accurate despite the absence of visual error feedback or tactile feedback about target location. When subjects were again presented a stationary scene, their initial reaches were indistinguishable from pre-exposure baseline, indicating a total absence of aftereffects. These experiments demonstrate that the nervous system automatically compensates in a context-specific fashion for the Coriolis forces associated with reaching movements.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
W. G. WRIGHT and S. GLASAUER
Haptic Subjective Vertical Shows Context Dependence: Task and Vision Play a Role during Dynamic Tilt Stimulation
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., October 1, 2003; 1004(1): 531 - 535.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Hirashima, K. Kudo, and T. Ohtsuki
Utilization and Compensation of Interaction Torques During Ball-Throwing Movements
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2003; 89(4): 1784 - 1796.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
N. I. Krouchev and J. F. Kalaska
Context-Dependent Anticipation of Different Task Dynamics: Rapid Recall of Appropriate Motor Skills Using Visual Cues
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2003; 89(2): 1165 - 1175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Flanders, J. M. Hondzinski, J. F. Soechting, and J. C. Jackson
Using Arm Configuration to Learn the Effects of Gyroscopes and Other Devices
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2003; 89(1): 450 - 459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. B. Dingwell, C. D. Mah, and F. A. Mussa-Ivaldi
Manipulating Objects With Internal Degrees of Freedom: Evidence for Model-Based Control
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2002; 88(1): 222 - 235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. DiZio and J. R. Lackner
Coriolis-Force-Induced Trajectory and Endpoint Deviations in the Reaching Movements of Labyrinthine-Defective Subjects
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2001; 85(2): 784 - 789.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. DiZio and J. R. Lackner
Congenitally Blind Individuals Rapidly Adapt to Coriolis Force Perturbations of Their Reaching Movements
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2000; 84(4): 2175 - 2180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online