JN AJP: Cell Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 84: 166-183, 2000;
0022-3077/00 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Snyder, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Beitel, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Snyder, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Beitel, R. E.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 84 No. 1 July 2000, pp. 166-183
Copyright ©2000 by the American Physiological Society

Responses of Inferior Colliculus Neurons to Amplitude-Modulated Intracochlear Electrical Pulses in Deaf Cats

Russell L. Snyder, Maike Vollmer, Charlotte M. Moore, Stephen J. Rebscher, Patricia A. Leake, and Ralph E. Beitel

Epstein Laboratory, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-0526

Snyder, Russell L., Maike Vollmer, Charlotte M. Moore, Stephen J. Rebscher, Patricia A. Leake, and Ralph E. Beitel. Responses of Inferior Colliculus Neurons to Amplitude-Modulated Intracochlear Electrical Pulses in Deaf Cats. J. Neurophysiol. 84: 166-183, 2000. Current cochlear prostheses use amplitude-modulated pulse trains to encode acoustic signals. In this study we examined the responses of inferior colliculus (IC) neurons to sinusoidal amplitude-modulated pulses and compared the maximum unmodulated pulse rate (Fmax) to which they responded with the maximum modulation frequency (maxFm) that they followed. Consistent with previous results, responses to unmodulated pulses were all low-pass functions of pulse rate. Mean Fmax to unmodulated pulses was 104 pulses per second (pps) and modal Fmax was 60 pps. Above Fmax IC neurons ceased responding except for an onset burst at the beginning of the stimulus. However, IC neurons responded to much higher pulse rates when these pulses were amplitude modulated; 74% were relatively insensitive to carrier rate and responded to all modulated carriers including those exceeding 600 pps. In contrast, the responses of these neurons (70%) were low-pass functions of modulation frequency, and the remaining (30%) had band-pass functions with a maxFm of 42 and 34 Hz, respectively. Thus temporal resolution of IC neurons for modulated frequencies is significantly lower than that for unmodulated pulses. These two measures of temporal resolution (Fmax and maxFm) were uncorrelated (r2 = 0.101). Several parameters influenced the amplitude and temporal structure of modulation responses including modulation depth, overall intensity and modulation-to-carrier rate ratio. We observed distortions in unit responses to amplitude-modulated signals when this ratio was 1/4 to 1/6. Since most current cochlear implant speech processors permit ratios that are significantly greater than this, severe distortion and signal degradation may occur frequently in these devices.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
TRENDS AMPLIFHome page
H. H. Lim, M. Lenarz, and T. Lenarz
Auditory Midbrain Implant: A Review
Trends in Amplification, September 1, 2009; 13(3): 149 - 180.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. C. Middlebrooks
Auditory Cortex Phase Locking to Amplitude-Modulated Cochlear Implant Pulse Trains
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2008; 100(1): 76 - 91.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. C. Middlebrooks
Cochlear-Implant High Pulse Rate and Narrow Electrode Configuration Impair Transmission of Temporal Information to the Auditory Cortex
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2008; 100(1): 92 - 107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
Z. M. Smith and B. Delgutte
Sensitivity of Inferior Colliculus Neurons to Interaural Time Differences in the Envelope Versus the Fine Structure With Bilateral Cochlear Implants
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2390 - 2407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
H. H. Lim, T. Lenarz, G. Joseph, R.-D. Battmer, A. Samii, M. Samii, J. F. Patrick, and M. Lenarz
Electrical Stimulation of the Midbrain for Hearing Restoration: Insight into the Functional Organization of the Human Central Auditory System
J. Neurosci., December 5, 2007; 27(49): 13541 - 13551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
A. Kral, J. Tillein, S. Heid, R. Hartmann, and R. Klinke
Postnatal Cortical Development in Congenital Auditory Deprivation
Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2005; 15(5): 552 - 562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Vollmer, R. E. Beitel, and R. L. Snyder
Auditory Detection and Discrimination in Deaf Cats: Psychophysical and Neural Thresholds for Intracochlear Electrical Signals
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2001; 86(5): 2330 - 2343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online