|
|
||||||||
The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 84 No. 1 July 2000, pp. 166-183
Copyright ©2000 by the American Physiological Society
Epstein Laboratory, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-0526
Snyder, Russell L.,
Maike Vollmer,
Charlotte M. Moore,
Stephen J. Rebscher,
Patricia A. Leake, and
Ralph E. Beitel.
Responses of Inferior Colliculus Neurons to Amplitude-Modulated
Intracochlear Electrical Pulses in Deaf Cats. J. Neurophysiol. 84: 166-183, 2000. Current cochlear
prostheses use amplitude-modulated pulse trains to encode acoustic
signals. In this study we examined the responses of inferior colliculus
(IC) neurons to sinusoidal amplitude-modulated pulses and compared the
maximum unmodulated pulse rate (Fmax) to which they responded with the
maximum modulation frequency (maxFm) that they followed. Consistent
with previous results, responses to unmodulated pulses were all
low-pass functions of pulse rate. Mean Fmax to unmodulated pulses was
104 pulses per second (pps) and modal Fmax was 60 pps. Above Fmax IC
neurons ceased responding except for an onset burst at the beginning of the stimulus. However, IC neurons responded to much higher pulse rates
when these pulses were amplitude modulated; 74% were relatively insensitive to carrier rate and responded to all modulated carriers including those exceeding 600 pps. In contrast, the responses of these
neurons (70%) were low-pass functions of modulation frequency, and the
remaining (30%) had band-pass functions with a maxFm of 42 and 34 Hz,
respectively. Thus temporal resolution of IC neurons for modulated
frequencies is significantly lower than that for unmodulated pulses.
These two measures of temporal resolution (Fmax and maxFm) were
uncorrelated (r2 = 0.101). Several
parameters influenced the amplitude and temporal structure of
modulation responses including modulation depth, overall intensity and
modulation-to-carrier rate ratio. We observed distortions in unit
responses to amplitude-modulated signals when this ratio was 1/4 to
1/6. Since most current cochlear implant speech processors permit
ratios that are significantly greater than this, severe distortion and
signal degradation may occur frequently in these devices.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. H. Lim, M. Lenarz, and T. Lenarz Auditory Midbrain Implant: A Review Trends in Amplification, September 1, 2009; 13(3): 149 - 180. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Middlebrooks Auditory Cortex Phase Locking to Amplitude-Modulated Cochlear Implant Pulse Trains J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2008; 100(1): 76 - 91. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Middlebrooks Cochlear-Implant High Pulse Rate and Narrow Electrode Configuration Impair Transmission of Temporal Information to the Auditory Cortex J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2008; 100(1): 92 - 107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. M. Smith and B. Delgutte Sensitivity of Inferior Colliculus Neurons to Interaural Time Differences in the Envelope Versus the Fine Structure With Bilateral Cochlear Implants J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2390 - 2407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. H. Lim, T. Lenarz, G. Joseph, R.-D. Battmer, A. Samii, M. Samii, J. F. Patrick, and M. Lenarz Electrical Stimulation of the Midbrain for Hearing Restoration: Insight into the Functional Organization of the Human Central Auditory System J. Neurosci., December 5, 2007; 27(49): 13541 - 13551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kral, J. Tillein, S. Heid, R. Hartmann, and R. Klinke Postnatal Cortical Development in Congenital Auditory Deprivation Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2005; 15(5): 552 - 562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Vollmer, R. E. Beitel, and R. L. Snyder Auditory Detection and Discrimination in Deaf Cats: Psychophysical and Neural Thresholds for Intracochlear Electrical Signals J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2001; 86(5): 2330 - 2343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |