|
|
||||||||
The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 84 No. 1 July 2000, pp. 184-188
Copyright ©2000 by the American Physiological Society
School of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway, London University, London TW20 0EX, United Kingdom
Corden, D. M.,
O.C.J. Lippold,
Katie Buchanan, and
Caryll Norrington.
Long-Latency Component of the Stretch Reflex in Human Muscle Is
Not Mediated by Intramuscular Stretch Receptors. J. Neurophysiol. 84: 184-188, 2000. Reflex responses
to mechanical stimulation of muscle (brief imposed movement) were
investigated. Reflexes were elicited in the forefinger, recording from
the first dorsal interosseous (FDI), and in the foot, recording from
soleus. These responses typically consisted of a short-latency
component (M1) and a long-latency component (M2) at 33 ms and 53 ms,
respectively, after the stimulus in the case of FDI, and 37 ms and 68 ms, respectively, in soleus upon stimulation of the sole of the foot.
Normally, when a muscle is stretched by a mechanical stimulus (either
naturally or by an experimentally imposed movement), both skin
receptors and muscle stretch receptors are activated. It is possible,
however, to devise stimulation parameters where this is not the case.
Fixating the finger with plasticine enables the effects of skin
stimulation to be studied without stretching the FDI muscle. On the
other hand, tapping a long tendon allows muscle stretch receptors to be
activated without involving skin or subcutaneous structures. Component
M1 was always abolished by finger fixation in 40 trials on 10 subjects,
with M2 being essentially unchanged in latency, duration, or amplitude.
Reflex responses were obtained in soleus muscle in nine experiments by
prodding the sole of the foot (thereby stimulating both skin and muscle
stretch receptors). Alternatively, the tendo achilles was prodded
(which solely activates stretch receptors in the muscle). In the
former, M1 and M2 were generated. In the latter, only M1 was produced.
It is concluded that the long-latency component of the stretch reflex,
M2, originates in skin and/or subcutaneous nerve terminals and that no
part of M2 originates in muscle stretch receptors.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Kourtis, H. F. Kwok, N. Roach, A. M. Wing, and P. Praamstra Maintaining Grip: Anticipatory and Reactive EEG Responses to Load Perturbations J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2008; 99(2): 545 - 553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. G Carson, S Riek, D. C Mackey, D. P Meichenbaum, K Willms, M Forner, and W. D Byblow Excitability changes in human forearm corticospinal projections and spinal reflex pathways during rhythmic voluntary movement of the opposite limb J. Physiol., November 1, 2004; 560(3): 929 - 940. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Li, D. G. Kamper, J. A. Stevens, and W. Z. Rymer The Effect of Motor Imagery on Spinal Segmental Excitability J. Neurosci., October 27, 2004; 24(43): 9674 - 9680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Fang, V. Siemionow, V. Sahgal, F. Xiong, and G. H. Yue Greater Movement-Related Cortical Potential During Human Eccentric Versus Concentric Muscle Contractions J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2001; 86(4): 1764 - 1772. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Gritsenko, V. Mushahwar, and A. Prochazka Adaptive changes in locomotor control after partial denervation of triceps surae muscles in the cat J. Physiol., May 15, 2001; 533(1): 299 - 311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |