JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 84: 96-101, 2000;
0022-3077/00 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Somers, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Leigh, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Somers, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Leigh, R. J.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 84 No. 1 July 2000, pp. 96-101
Copyright ©2000 by the American Physiological Society

Saccades to Sounds: Effects of Tracking Illusory Visual Stimuli

Jeffrey T. Somers,1,2 Vallabh E. Das,1,2 Louis F. Dell'Osso,1,2 and R. John Leigh1,2,3

 1Department of Neurology,  2Department of Biomedical Engineering, and  3Department of Neuroscience, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University Hospitals, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106

Somers, Jeffrey T., Vallabh E. Das, Louis F. Dell'Osso, and R. John Leigh. Saccades to Sounds: Effects of Tracking Illusory Visual Stimuli. J. Neurophysiol. 84: 96-101, 2000. In 10 normal human subjects, we studied the accuracy of memory-guided saccades made to the remembered locations of visual targets and sounds. During the time of stimulus presentation, subjects were smoothly tracking a projected laser spot that was moving horizontally across a tangent screen, sinusoidally ±15° at 0.25 Hz. In one set of experiments, the laser spot moved across a 40° × 28° random dot display that moved synchronously in the vertical plane; this induced a strong illusion that the trajectory of the laser spot was diagonal (variant of Duncker illusion). In control experiments, the laser spot moved across the same display, which was stationary. The visual targets and speakers were at six locations (range ±15°) in the horizontal plane. Saccades made to the remembered locations of targets presented during background motion (illusion) were significantly (P < 0.05) more inaccurate than with the background stationary (control) in 9 of 10 subjects for lights and in 6 of 10 subjects for sounds. As a group, the median change in errors due to the Duncker illusion was ~2.5 times greater for visual compared with acoustic targets (P < 0.001). These findings are consistent with electrophysiological studies which have shown that neurons in the primate lateral intraparietal area (LIP) may respond to both visual and auditory targets and these neurons are also influenced by the Duncker illusion during programming of memory-guided saccades.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online