JN AJP: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 84: 863-875, 2000;
0022-3077/00 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, C. E.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 84 No. 2 August 2000, pp. 863-875
Copyright ©2000 by the American Physiological Society

Time Course and Magnitude of Movement-Related Gating of Tactile Detection in Humans. II. Effects of Stimulus Intensity

Stephan R. Williams1,2 and C. Elaine Chapman1,2,3

 1Centre de Recherche en Sciences Neurologiques,  2Département de Physiologie, and  3École de Réadaptation, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3J7, Canada

Williams, Stephan R. and C. Elaine Chapman. Time Course and Magnitude of Movement-Related Gating of Tactile Detection in Humans. II. Effects of Stimulus Intensity. J. Neurophysiol. 84: 863-875, 2000. This study examined the effect of systematically varying stimulus intensity on the time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection and scaling in 17 human subjects trained to perform a rapid abduction of the right index finger (D2) in response to a visual cue. Electrical stimulation was delivered to D2 at five different intensities. At the lowest intensity, approximately 90% of stimuli were detected at rest (1 × P90); four multiples of this intensity were also tested (1.25, 1.5, 1.75, and 2.0 × P90). At all intensities of stimulation, detection of stimuli applied to the moving digit was diminished significantly and in a time-dependent manner, with peak decreases occurring within ±12 ms of the onset of electromyographic activity in the first dorsal interosseous (25-45 ms before movement onset). Reductions in the proportion of stimuli detected were greatest at the lowest stimulus intensity and progressively smaller at higher intensities. No shift in the timing of the decreases in performance was seen with increasing intensity. Once the weakest intensity at which most stimuli were perceived during movement had been established (2 × P90), magnitude estimation experiments were performed using two stimulus intensities, 2 × P90 (5 subjects) and 3 × P90 (3 subjects). Significant movement-related decreases in estimated stimulus magnitude were observed at both intensities, the time course of which was similar to the time course of reductions in detection performance. As stimulus intensity increased, the magnitude of the movement-related decrease in scaling diminished. A model of detection performance that accurately described the effect of stimulus intensity and timing on movement-related reductions in detection was created. This model was then combined with a previous model that described the effects of stimulus localization and timing to predict detection performance at a given stimulation site, intensity, and time during movement. Movement-related gating of tactile perception represents the end result of movement-related effects on the transmission and subsequent processing of the stimulus. The combined model clearly defines many of the requirements that proposed physiological mechanisms of movement-related gating will have to fulfill.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. E. Chapman and E. Beauchamp
Differential Controls Over Tactile Detection in Humans by Motor Commands and Peripheral Reafference
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2006; 96(3): 1664 - 1675.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
H. Tanaka, J. W. Krakauer, and N. Qian
An Optimization Principle for Determining Movement Duration
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2006; 95(6): 3875 - 3886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. R. Williams and C. E. Chapman
Time Course and Magnitude of Movement-Related Gating of Tactile Detection in Humans. III. Effect of Motor Tasks
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2002; 88(4): 1968 - 1979.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online