|
|
||||||||
The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 84 No. 2 August 2000, pp. 927-933
Copyright ©2000 by the American Physiological Society
1Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois 60611; and 2Department of Pharmacology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030
Schweitzer, Jeffrey S.,
Haiwei Wang,
Zhi-Qi Xiong, and
Janet L. Stringer.
pH Sensitivity of Non-Synaptic Field Bursts in the Dentate Gyrus. J. Neurophysiol. 84: 927-933, 2000. Under conditions of low [Ca2+]o and
high [K+]o, the rat dentate granule cell
layer in vitro develops recurrent spontaneous prolonged field bursts
that resemble an in vivo phenomenon called maximal dentate activation.
To understand how pH changes in vivo might affect this phenomenon, the
slices were exposed to different extracellular pH environments in
vitro. The field bursts were highly sensitive to extracellular pH over
the range 7.0-7.6 and were suppressed at low pH and enhanced at high
pH. Granule cell resting membrane potential, action potentials, and
postsynaptic potentials were not significantly altered by pH changes
within the range that suppressed the bursts. The pH sensitivity of the
bursts was not altered by pharmacologic blockade of
N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA), non-NMDA, and
GABAA receptors at concentrations of these agents sufficient to eliminate both spontaneous and evoked synaptic
potentials. Gap junction patency is known to be sensitive to pH, and
agents that block gap junctions, including octanol, oleamide, and
carbenoxolone, blocked the prolonged field bursts in a manner similar
to low pH. Perfusion with gap junction blockers or acidic pH suppressed field bursts but did not block spontaneous firing of single and multiple units, including burst firing. These data suggest that the pH
sensitivity of seizures and epileptiform phenomena in vivo may be
mediated in large part through mechanisms other than suppression of
NMDA-mediated or other excitatory synaptic transmission. Alterations in
electrotonic coupling via gap junctions, affecting field
synchronization, may be one such process.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. D. Traub, D. Contreras, M. O. Cunningham, H. Murray, F. E. N. LeBeau, A. Roopun, A. Bibbig, W. B. Wilent, M. J. Higley, and M. A. Whittington Single-Column Thalamocortical Network Model Exhibiting Gamma Oscillations, Sleep Spindles, and Epileptogenic Bursts J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2005; 93(4): 2194 - 2232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. L. Colgin, D. Kubota, F. A. Brucher, Y. Jia, E. Branyan, C. M. Gall, and G. Lynch Spontaneous Waves in the Dentate Gyrus of Slices From the Ventral Hippocampus J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2004; 92(6): 3385 - 3398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Jahromi, K. Wentlandt, S. Piran, and P. L. Carlen Anticonvulsant Actions of Gap Junctional Blockers in an In Vitro Seizure Model J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2002; 88(4): 1893 - 1902. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Schuchmann, H. Meierkord, K. Stenkamp, J. Breustedt, O. Windmuller, U. Heinemann, and K. Buchheim Synaptic and Nonsynaptic Ictogenesis Occurs at Different Temperatures in Submerged and Interface Rat Brain Slices J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2002; 87(6): 2929 - 2935. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |