JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 84: 1330-1345, 2000;
0022-3077/00 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Samson, F. K.
Right arrow Articles by Imig, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Samson, F. K.
Right arrow Articles by Imig, T. J.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 84 No. 3 September 2000, pp. 1330-1345
Copyright ©2000 by the American Physiological Society

Directionality Derived From Differential Sensitivity to Monaural and Binaural Cues in the Cat's Medial Geniculate Body

Frank K. Samson, Pascal Barone, W. Andrew Irons, Janine C. Clarey, Pierre Poirier, and Thomas J. Imig

Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas 66160-7401

Samson, Frank K., Pascal Barone, W. Andrew Irons, Janine C. Clarey, Pierre Poirier, and Thomas J. Imig. Directionality Derived From Differential Sensitivity to Monaural and Binaural Cues in the Cat's Medial Geniculate Body. J. Neurophysiol. 84: 1330-1345, 2000. Azimuth tuning of high-frequency neurons in the primary auditory cortex (AI) is known to depend on binaural disparity and monaural spectral (pinna) cues present in broadband noise bursts. Single-unit response patterns differ according to binaural interactions, strength of monaural excitatory input from each ear, and azimuth sensitivity to monaural stimulation. The latter characteristic has been used as a gauge of neural sensitivity to monaural spectral directional cues. Azimuth sensitivity may depend predominantly on binaural disparity cues, exclusively on monaural spectral cues, or on both. The primary goal of this study was to determine whether each cortical response pattern corresponds to a similar pattern in the medial geniculate body (MGB) or whether some patterns are unique to the cortex. Single-unit responses were recorded from the ventral nucleus (Vn) and lateral part of the posterior group of thalamic nuclei (Po), tonotopic subdivisions of the MGB. Responses to free-field presentation of noise bursts that varied in azimuth and sound pressure level were obtained using methods identical to those used previously in field AI. Many units were azimuth sensitive, i.e., they responded well at some azimuths, and poorly, if at all, at others. These were studied further by obtaining responses to monaural noise stimulation, approximated by reversible plugging of one ear. Monaural directional (MD) cells were sensitive to the azimuth of monaural noise stimulation, whereas binaural directional (BD) cells were either insensitive to its azimuth or monaurally unresponsive. Thus BD and MD cells show differential sensitivity to monaural spectral cues. Monaural azimuth sensitivity could not be used to interpret the spectral sensitivity of predominantly binaural cells that exhibited strong binaural facilitation because they were either unresponsive or poorly responsive to monaural stimulation. The available evidence suggests that some such cells are sensitive to spectral cues. The results do not indicate the presence of any response types in AI that are not present in the MGB. Vn and Po contain similar classes of MD and BD cells. Because Po neurons project to the anterior auditory field, neurons in this cortical area also are likely to exhibit differential sensitivity to binaural disparity and monaural spectral cues. Comparison of these MGB data with a published report of cochlear nucleus (CN) single-unit azimuth tuning shows that MGB sensitivity to spectral cues is considerably stronger than CN sensitivity.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. T. Nakamoto, J. Zhang, and L. M. Kitzes
Response Patterns Along an Isofrequency Contour in Cat Primary Auditory Cortex (AI) to Stimuli Varying in Average and Interaural Levels
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2004; 91(1): 118 - 135.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. Poirier, F. K. Samson, and T. J. Imig
Spectral Shape Sensitivity Contributes to the Azimuth Tuning of Neurons in the Cat's Inferior Colliculus
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2003; 89(5): 2760 - 2777.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. M. Miller, M. A. Escabi, H. L. Read, and C. E. Schreiner
Spectrotemporal Receptive Fields in the Lemniscal Auditory Thalamus and Cortex
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2002; 87(1): 516 - 527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online