|
|
||||||||
The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 84 No. 3 September 2000, pp. 1330-1345
Copyright ©2000 by the American Physiological Society
Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas 66160-7401
Samson, Frank K.,
Pascal Barone,
W. Andrew Irons,
Janine C. Clarey,
Pierre Poirier, and
Thomas J. Imig.
Directionality Derived From Differential Sensitivity to Monaural
and Binaural Cues in the Cat's Medial Geniculate Body. J. Neurophysiol. 84: 1330-1345, 2000. Azimuth
tuning of high-frequency neurons in the primary auditory cortex
(AI) is known to depend on binaural disparity
and monaural spectral (pinna) cues present in broadband noise bursts. Single-unit response patterns differ according to binaural
interactions, strength of monaural excitatory input from each ear, and
azimuth sensitivity to monaural stimulation. The latter characteristic has been used as a gauge of neural sensitivity to monaural spectral directional cues. Azimuth sensitivity may depend predominantly on
binaural disparity cues, exclusively on monaural spectral cues, or on
both. The primary goal of this study was to determine whether each
cortical response pattern corresponds to a similar pattern in the
medial geniculate body (MGB) or whether some patterns are unique to the
cortex. Single-unit responses were recorded from the ventral nucleus
(Vn) and lateral part of the posterior group of thalamic nuclei (Po),
tonotopic subdivisions of the MGB. Responses to free-field presentation
of noise bursts that varied in azimuth and sound pressure level were
obtained using methods identical to those used previously in field AI.
Many units were azimuth sensitive, i.e., they responded well at some
azimuths, and poorly, if at all, at others. These were studied further
by obtaining responses to monaural noise stimulation, approximated by
reversible plugging of one ear. Monaural directional (MD) cells were
sensitive to the azimuth of monaural noise stimulation, whereas
binaural directional (BD) cells were either insensitive to its azimuth or monaurally unresponsive. Thus BD and MD cells show differential sensitivity to monaural spectral cues. Monaural azimuth sensitivity could not be used to interpret the spectral sensitivity of
predominantly binaural cells that exhibited strong binaural
facilitation because they were either unresponsive or poorly responsive
to monaural stimulation. The available evidence suggests that some such
cells are sensitive to spectral cues. The results do not indicate the presence of any response types in AI that are not present in the MGB.
Vn and Po contain similar classes of MD and BD cells. Because Po
neurons project to the anterior auditory field, neurons in this
cortical area also are likely to exhibit differential sensitivity to
binaural disparity and monaural spectral cues. Comparison of these MGB
data with a published report of cochlear nucleus (CN) single-unit
azimuth tuning shows that MGB sensitivity to spectral cues is
considerably stronger than CN sensitivity.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. T. Nakamoto, J. Zhang, and L. M. Kitzes Response Patterns Along an Isofrequency Contour in Cat Primary Auditory Cortex (AI) to Stimuli Varying in Average and Interaural Levels J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2004; 91(1): 118 - 135. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. Poirier, F. K. Samson, and T. J. Imig Spectral Shape Sensitivity Contributes to the Azimuth Tuning of Neurons in the Cat's Inferior Colliculus J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2003; 89(5): 2760 - 2777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Miller, M. A. Escabi, H. L. Read, and C. E. Schreiner Spectrotemporal Receptive Fields in the Lemniscal Auditory Thalamus and Cortex J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2002; 87(1): 516 - 527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |