JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 84: 1404-1413, 2000;
0022-3077/00 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koga, T.
Right arrow Articles by Bradley, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koga, T.
Right arrow Articles by Bradley, R. M.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 84 No. 3 September 2000, pp. 1404-1413
Copyright ©2000 by the American Physiological Society

Biophysical Properties and Responses to Neurotransmitters of Petrosal and Geniculate Ganglion Neurons Innervating the Tongue

Tomoshige Koga1 and Robert M. Bradley1,2

 1Department of Biologic and Materials Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-1078; and  2Department of Physiology, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0622

Koga, Tomoshige and Robert M. Bradley. Biophysical Properties and Responses to Neurotransmitters of Petrosal and Geniculate Ganglion Neurons Innervating the Tongue. J. Neurophysiol. 84: 1404-1413, 2000. The properties of afferent sensory neurons supplying taste receptors on the tongue were examined in vitro. Neurons in the geniculate (GG) and petrosal ganglia (PG) supplying the tongue were fluorescently labeled, acutely dissociated, and then analyzed using patch-clamp recording. Measurement of the dissociated neurons revealed that PG neurons were significantly larger than GG neurons. The active and passive membrane properties of these ganglion neurons were examined and compared with each other. There were significant differences between the properties of neurons in the PG and GG ganglia. The mean membrane time constant, spike threshold, action potential half-width, and action potential decay time of GG neurons was significantly less than those of PG neurons. Neurons in the PG had action potentials that had a fast rise and fall time (sharp action potentials) as well as action potentials with a deflection or hump on the falling phase (humped action potentials), whereas action potentials of GG neurons were all sharp. There were also significant differences in the response of PG and GG neurons to the application of acetylcholine (ACh), serotonin (5HT), substance P (SP), and GABA. Whereas PG neurons responded to ACh, 5HT, SP, and GABA, GG neurons only responded to SP and GABA. In addition, the properties of GG neurons were more homogeneous than those of the PG because all the GG neurons had sharp spikes and when responses to neurotransmitters occurred, either all or most of the neurons responded. These differences between neurons of the GG and PG may relate to the type of receptor innervated. PG ganglion neurons innervate a number of receptor types on the posterior tongue and have more heterogeneous properties, while GG neurons predominantly innervate taste buds and have more homogeneous properties.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Grigaliunas, R. M. Bradley, D. K. MacCallum, and C. M. Mistretta
Distinctive Neurophysiological Properties of Embryonic Trigeminal and Geniculate Neurons in Culture
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2002; 88(4): 2058 - 2074.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online