JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 84: 2302-2316, 2000;
0022-3077/00 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Medendorp, W. P.
Right arrow Articles by Gielen, C.C.A.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Medendorp, W. P.
Right arrow Articles by Gielen, C.C.A.M.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 84 No. 5 November 2000, pp. 2302-2316
Copyright ©2000 by the American Physiological Society

Kinematic Strategies for Upper Arm-Forearm Coordination in Three Dimensions

W. P. Medendorp,2 J. D. Crawford,1 D.Y.P. Henriques,1 J.A.M. Van Gisbergen,2 and C.C.A.M. Gielen2

 1Medical Research Council Group for Action and Perception, Centre for Vision Research and Departments of Psychology and Biology, York University, Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada; and  2Department of Medical Physics and Biophysics, University of Nijmegen, NL 6525 EZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Medendorp, W. P., J. D. Crawford, D.Y.P. Henriques, J.A.M. Van Gisbergen, and C.C.A.M. Gielen. Kinematic Strategies for Upper Arm-Forearm Coordination in Three Dimensions. J. Neurophysiol. 84: 2302-2316, 2000. This study addressed the question of how the three-dimensional (3-D) control strategy for the upper arm depends on what the forearm is doing. Subjects were instructed to point a laser---attached in line with the upper arm---toward various visual targets, such that two-dimensional (2-D) pointing directions of the upper arm were held constant across different tasks. For each such task, subjects maintained one of several static upper arm-forearm configurations, i.e., each with a set elbow angle and forearm orientation. Upper arm, forearm, and eye orientations were measured with the use of 3-D search coils. The results confirmed that Donders' law (a behavioral restriction of 3-D orientation vectors to a 2-D "surface") does not hold across all pointing tasks, i.e., for a given pointing target, upper arm torsion varied widely. However, for any one static elbow configuration, torsional variance was considerably reduced and was independent of previous arm position, resulting in a thin, Donders-like surface of orientation vectors. More importantly, the shape of this surface (which describes upper arm torsion as a function of its 2-D pointing direction) depended on both elbow angle and forearm orientation. For pointing with the arm fully extended or with the elbow flexed in the horizontal plane, a Listing's-law-like strategy was observed, minimizing shoulder rotations to and from center at the cost of position-dependent tilts in the forearm. In contrast, when the arm was bent in the vertical plane, the surface of best fit showed a Fick-like twist that increased continuously as a function of static elbow flexion, thereby reducing position-dependent tilts of the forearm with respect to gravity. In each case, the torsional variance from these surfaces remained constant, suggesting that Donders' law was obeyed equally well for each task condition. Further experiments established that these kinematic rules were independent of gaze direction and eye orientation, suggesting that Donders' law of the arm does not coordinate with Listing's law for the eye. These results revive the idea that Donders' law is an important governing principle for the control of arm movements but also suggest that its various forms may only be limited manifestations of a more general set of context-dependent kinematic rules. We propose that these rules are implemented by neural velocity commands arising as a function of initial arm orientation and desired pointing direction, calculated such that the torsional orientation of the upper arm is implicitly coordinated with desired forearm posture.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. Guigon, P. Baraduc, and M. Desmurget
Computational Motor Control: Redundancy and Invariance
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 331 - 347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. D. Crawford, W. P. Medendorp, and J. J. Marotta
Spatial Transformations for Eye-Hand Coordination
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2004; 92(1): 10 - 19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. Y. P. Henriques, M. Flanders, and J. F. Soechting
Haptic Synthesis of Shapes and Sequences
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2004; 91(4): 1808 - 1821.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. J. Marotta, W. P. Medendorp, and J. D. Crawford
Kinematic Rules for Upper and Lower Arm Contributions to Grasp Orientation
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2003; 90(6): 3816 - 3827.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
T. EGGERT, T. TIHANYI, and A. STRAUBE
Solving the Redundancy Problem for Unrestricted Reaching Movements: A Comparison of Patients with Cerebral Infarcts and Healthy Controls
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., October 1, 2003; 1004(1): 511 - 515.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online