JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Neurophysiol 84: 2638-2650, 2000;
0022-3077/00 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keller, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, T. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Keller, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, T. T.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 84 No. 5 November 2000, pp. 2638-2650
Copyright ©2000 by the American Physiological Society

Representation of Temporal Features of Complex Sounds by the Discharge Patterns of Neurons in the Owl's Inferior Colliculus

Clifford H. Keller and Terry T. Takahashi

Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403

Keller, Clifford H. and Terry T. Takahashi. Representation of Temporal Features of Complex Sounds by the Discharge Patterns of Neurons in the Owl's Inferior Colliculus. J. Neurophysiol. 84: 2638-2650, 2000. The spiking pattern evoked in cells of the owl's inferior colliculus by repeated presentation of the same broadband noise was found to be highly reproducible and synchronized with the temporal features of the noise stimulus. The pattern remained largely unchanged when the stimulus was presented from spatial loci that evoke similar average firing rates. To better understand this patterning, we computed the pre-event stimulus ensemble (PESE)---the average of the stimuli that preceded each spike. Computing the PESE by averaging the pressure waveforms produced a noisy, featureless trace, suggesting that the patterning was not synchronized to a particular waveform in the fine structure. By contrast, computing the PESE by averaging the stimulus envelope revealed an average envelope waveform, the "PESE envelope," typically having a peak preceded by a trough. Increasing the overall stimulus level produced PESE envelopes with higher amplitudes, suggesting a decrease in the jitter of the cell's response. The effect of carrier frequency on the PESE envelope was investigated by obtaining a cell's response to broadband noise and either estimating the PESE envelope for each spectral band or by computing a spectrogram of the stimulus prior to each spike. Either method yielded the cell's PESE spectrogram, a plot of the average amplitude of each carrier-frequency component at various pre-spike times. PESE spectrograms revealed surfaces with peaks and troughs at certain frequencies and pre-spike times. These features are collectively called the spectrotemporal receptive field (STRF). The shape of the STRF showed that in many cases, the carrier frequency can affect the PESE envelope. The modulation transfer function (MTF), which describes a cell's ability to respond to time-varying amplitudes, was estimated with sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) noises. Comparison of the PESE envelope with the MTF in the time and frequency domains showed that the two were closely matched, suggesting that a cell's response to SAM stimuli is largely predictable from its response to a noise-modulated carrier. The STRF is considered to be a model of the linear component of a system's response to dynamic stimuli. Using the STRF, we estimated the degree to which we could predict a cell's response to an arbitrary broadband noise by comparing the convolution of the STRF and the envelope of the noise with the cell's post-stimulus time histogram to the same noise. The STRF explained 18-46% of the variance of a cell's response to broadband noise.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
B. J. Fischer, G. B. Christianson, and J. L. Pena
Cross-Correlation in the Auditory Coincidence Detectors of Owls
J. Neurosci., August 6, 2008; 28(32): 8107 - 8115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
N. A. Lesica and B. Grothe
Dynamic Spectrotemporal Feature Selectivity in the Auditory Midbrain
J. Neurosci., May 21, 2008; 28(21): 5412 - 5421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. B. Christianson and J. L. Pena
Preservation of Spectrotemporal Tuning Between the Nucleus Laminaris and the Inferior Colliculus of the Barn Owl
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2007; 97(5): 3544 - 3553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
C. H. Keller and T. T. Takahashi
Localization and Identification of Concurrent Sounds in the Owl's Auditory Space Map
J. Neurosci., November 9, 2005; 25(45): 10446 - 10461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
M. A. Escabi, R. Nassiri, L. M. Miller, C. E. Schreiner, and H. L. Read
The Contribution of Spike Threshold to Acoustic Feature Selectivity, Spike Information Content, and Information Throughput
J. Neurosci., October 12, 2005; 25(41): 9524 - 9534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. M. N. Woolley and J. H. Casseday
Processing of Modulated Sounds in the Zebra Finch Auditory Midbrain: Responses to Noise, Frequency Sweeps, and Sinusoidal Amplitude Modulations
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2005; 94(2): 1143 - 1157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Physiol. Rev.Home page
P. X. JORIS, C. E. SCHREINER, and A. REES
Neural Processing of Amplitude-Modulated Sounds
Physiol Rev, April 1, 2004; 84(2): 541 - 577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. M. N. Woolley and J. H. Casseday
Response Properties of Single Neurons in the Zebra Finch Auditory Midbrain: Response Patterns, Frequency Coding, Intensity Coding, and Spike Latencies
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2004; 91(1): 136 - 151.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. F. Linden, R. C. Liu, M. Sahani, C. E. Schreiner, and M. M. Merzenich
Spectrotemporal Structure of Receptive Fields in Areas AI and AAF of Mouse Auditory Cortex
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2003; 90(4): 2660 - 2675.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
M. L. Spezio and T. T. Takahashi
Frequency-Specific Interaural Level Difference Tuning Predicts Spatial Response Patterns of Space-Specific Neurons in the Barn Owl Inferior Colliculus
J. Neurosci., June 1, 2003; 23(11): 4677 - 4688.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
D. J. Tollin and T. C. T. Yin
The Coding of Spatial Location by Single Units in the Lateral Superior Olive of the Cat. I. Spatial Receptive Fields in Azimuth
J. Neurosci., February 15, 2002; 22(4): 1454 - 1467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. Sen, F. E. Theunissen, and A. J. Doupe
Feature Analysis of Natural Sounds in the Songbird Auditory Forebrain
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2001; 86(3): 1445 - 1458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
W. C. Loftus and M. L. Sutter
Spectrotemporal Organization of Excitatory and Inhibitory Receptive Fields of Cat Posterior Auditory Field Neurons
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2001; 86(1): 475 - 491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online